Traditional versus cooled-radiofrequency neurotomy for the treatment of chronic lumbar facet (zygapophyseal) joint pain

被引:0
|
作者
Candan, Burcu [1 ]
Gungor, Semih [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Anesthesiol Crit Care & Pain Management, Div Musculoskeletal & Intervent Pain Management, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Chronic low back pain; chronic lumbar facet joint pain; conventional radiofrequency ablation; cooled-radiofrequency ablation; facet related back pain; LOW-BACK-PAIN; AMERICAN SOCIETY; DOUBLE-BLIND; DENERVATION; MANAGEMENT; ABLATION; GUIDELINES; INJECTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1080/17581869.2024.2377061
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: Traditional radiofrequency ablation (TRFA) effectively treats facet joint-related pain, while water-cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) may offer benefits like larger lesions and easier nerve access. Our goal is to assess the effectiveness of TRFA and CRFA for facet joint-related pain. Materials & methods: This retrospective study included an evaluation of 346 RFA interventions performed on 190 patients suffering from long-term low-back pain. The primary outcome was defined as a decrease of >= 50% of the mean numeric rating scale. Results: The primary outcome was achieved at the first follow-up (FU) for both TRFA and CRFA, with pain relief of 55.2 and 60.5%, respectively. At the second FU, the primary outcome was achieved only in the CRFA group (54.1%), although the TRFA group also showed a good improvement (48.6%). In both groups, pain relief was under 50% during the third FU. Conclusion: Our study indicates that both CRFA and TRFA modalities are effective and safe treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 314
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cooled-radiofrequency neurotomy for the treatment of chronic lumbar facet (zygapophyseal) joint pain A retrospective study
    Candan, Burcu
    Gungor, Semih
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (52)
  • [2] The efficacy and safety of cooled-radiofrequency neurotomy in the treatment of chronic thoracic facet (zygapophyseal) joint pain A retrospective study
    Gungor, Semih
    Candan, Burcu
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (14)
  • [3] Cooled Versus Conventional Thermal Radiofrequency Neurotomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Facet-Mediated Pain Response
    Wang, Wenbao
    Cheng, Jianguo
    PM&R, 2015, 7 (10) : 1097 - 1099
  • [4] Randomized prospective trial of cooled versus traditional radiofrequency ablation of the medial branch nerves for the treatment of lumbar facet joint pain
    McCormick, Zachary L.
    Choi, Heejung
    Reddy, Rajiv
    Syed, Raafay H.
    Bhave, Meghan
    Kendall, Mark C.
    Khan, Dost
    Nagpal, Geeta
    Teramoto, Masaru
    Walega, David R.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2019, 44 (03) : 389 - 397
  • [5] Radiofrequency Neurotomy of Medial Branches for Chronic Zygapophyseal Joint Pain in Radiological Settings
    Maizlin, Z., V
    Clement, J.
    Harrison, P. B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (05)
  • [6] Radiofrequency Facet Joint Neurotomy in Treatment of Facet Syndrome
    Yilmaz, Cem
    Kabatas, Serdar
    Cansever, Tufan
    Gulsen, Salih
    Coven, Ilker
    Caner, Hakan
    Altinors, Nur
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2010, 23 (07): : 480 - 485
  • [7] Effectiveness of repeated radiofrequency neurotomy for lumbar facet pain
    Schofferman, J
    Kine, G
    SPINE, 2004, 29 (21) : 2471 - 2473
  • [8] IN RESPONSE TO: RADIOFREQUENCY NEUROTOMY FOR CHRONIC LUMBAR FACET PAIN-INTERPRETING THE EVIDENCE
    Leclaire, Richard
    Fortin, Luc
    Bergeron, Yves
    Lambert, Richard
    Rossignol, Michel
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2010, 10 (03) : 261 - 262
  • [9] Efficacy and validity of radiofrequency neurotomy for chronic lumbar zygapophysial joint pain
    Dreyfuss, P
    Halbrook, B
    Pauza, K
    Joshi, A
    SPINE, 2000, 25 (10) : 1270 - 1277
  • [10] Pulsed radiofrequency therapy might be not inferior to thermal neurotomy in lumbar facet joint pain: a commentary
    Sprott, Haiko
    Bergamin, Norina
    Aeschbach, Armin
    RHEUMATOLOGY REPORTS, 2016, 8 (01) : 1 - 4