Synergies Between Case-Based Reasoning and Deep Learning for Survival Analysis in Oncology

被引:1
|
作者
Bichindaritz, Isabelle [1 ]
Liu, Guanghui [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Oswego, Dept Comp Sci, Oswego, NY 13126 USA
关键词
Survival Analysis; Deep Network; Case-based Reasoning; Objective Loss; Explainable Model; COX; PATHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-40177-0_2
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Survival analysis is a field of statistics specialized in making predictions about the survival length of patients, even though it can be applied to the prediction of any future event. It is routinely used in medical research to stratify patients in groups based on risk, such as high-risk groups and low-risk groups, and has paramount important in patient stratification and treatment. Recently, deep neural networks (DNNs) have raised considerable attention for survival analysis because of their non-linear nature and their excellent ability to predict survival, in comparison to statistical methods. In this domain, case-based survival methods have started to by applied as well, with some success. It is therefore interesting to study how to synergistically combine the two for improved performance for several reasons. From the case-based reasoning standpoint, the deep neural network can detect deep similarity between cases with a time-to-event structure and from the DNN standpoint, case-based reasoning can provide the glass-box approach that remedies the "black box" label attached to them. In this study, we propose a synergy between case-based reasoning and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model for survival prediction in oncology. In this deep survival model network, the total loss function combines four different factors and uses an adaptive weights approach to combine the four loss terms. The network learns a prototype layer during training which naturally comes with an explanation for each prediction. This study employs cross-validation and the concordance index for assessing the survival prediction performance and demonstrate on two cancer methylation data sets that the developed approach is effective.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 33
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On Bringing Case-Based Reasoning Methodology to Deep Learning
    Leake, David
    Crandall, David
    [J]. CASE-BASED REASONING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, ICCBR 2020, 2020, 12311 : 343 - 348
  • [2] Qualitative case-based reasoning and learning
    Donadon Homem, Thiago Pedro
    Santos, Paulo Eduardo
    Reali Costa, Anna Helena
    da Costa Bianchi, Reinaldo Augusto
    de Mantaras, Ramon Lopez
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 283 (283)
  • [3] Case-Based Reasoning in Transfer Learning
    Aha, David W.
    Molineaux, Matthew
    Sukthankar, Gita
    [J]. CASE-BASED REASONING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5650 : 29 - +
  • [4] A Case-Based Reasoning Model Powered by Deep Learning for Radiology Report Recommendation
    Amador-Dominguez, Elvira
    Serrano, Emilio
    Manrique, Daniel
    Bajo, Javier
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 7 (02): : 15 - 26
  • [5] Deep learning and case-based reasoning for predictive and adaptive traffic emergency management
    Ali Louati
    Hassen Louati
    Zhaojian Li
    [J]. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2021, 77 : 4389 - 4418
  • [6] Deep learning and case-based reasoning for predictive and adaptive traffic emergency management
    Louati, Ali
    Louati, Hassen
    Li, Zhaojian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2021, 77 (05): : 4389 - 4418
  • [7] On Application of Case-Based Reasoning to Personalise Learning
    Mamcenko, Jelena
    Kurilovas, Eugenijus
    Krikun, Irina
    [J]. INFORMATICS IN EDUCATION, 2019, 18 (02): : 345 - 358
  • [8] Learning taxonomic relation by case-based reasoning
    Satoh, K
    [J]. THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2005, 348 (01) : 58 - 69
  • [9] Learning taxonomic relation by case-based reasoning
    Satoh, K
    [J]. ALGORITHMIC LEARNING THEORY, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 1968 : 179 - 193
  • [10] Adaptation rule learning for case-based reasoning
    Li, Huan
    Li, Xin
    Hu, Dawei
    Ha, Tianyong
    Wenyin, Liu
    Chen, Xiaoping
    [J]. CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2009, 21 (05): : 673 - 689