A figurational analysis of Health and/or Physical Education teacher educators' conceptualisations of policy, and their sociogenesis

被引:0
|
作者
Alfrey, Laura [1 ]
Scanlon, Dylan [2 ]
Aldous, David [3 ]
Lorusso, Jenna [4 ]
Baker, Kellie [5 ]
Clark, Christopher [6 ]
Jafar, Mo [7 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Fac Educ, Peninsula Campus, Frankston 3199, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Sch Educ, Geelong Waurn Ponds Campus, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[3] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Educ, Joondalup, Australia
[4] Univ Limerick, Dept Phys Educ & Sport Sci, Limerick, Ireland
[5] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Educ, St John, NF, Canada
[6] Victorian Curriculum & Assessment Author, Hlth & Phys Educ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ East London, Dept Sport, London, England
关键词
Policy; curriculum; figurational sociology; teacher education; GROUNDED THEORY;
D O I
10.1080/13573322.2024.2408561
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Policy engagement is key to promoting quality physical education yet it has been identified as a 'grand challenge' for Health and/or Physical Education (H/PE) internationally. All H/PE professionals, including teacher educators, have a collective responsibility to engage with policy but existing research tells us little about how H/PE teacher educators (H/PETEs) understand and engage with policy. It is important to examine H/PETEs conceptualisations of policy for a few reasons, not least because teacher educators play a crucial role in supporting future generations of teachers who themselves will need to engage with policy as a core feature of their professional lives. Drawing on figurational sociology, and the concept of assemblage, this paper offers insights into the nature and development - or sociogenesis - of teacher educators' conceptualisations of policy. The data shared in this paper was generated through semi-structured interviews with 12 H/PETE from 7 countries. Inductive-deductive analysis - drawing largely on figurational concepts such as interdependence, power, habitus and sociogenesis - revealed that H/PETEs conceptualised policy as: (i) informing intended action and change; (ii) a way to govern practice; (iii) imposition and possibility. In terms of how these conceptualisations came to be, key features of the H/PETE figuration that were identified as influential include: (i) interdependence with human and non-human elements; (ii) balances of power and (iii) social and individual habitus. It is concluded that capitalising on these elements through professional learning, for example, could support H/PETEs in engaging with policy in productive and meaningful ways. Given that engaging with policy is viewed as a collective responsibility of H/PETEs, and many - if not all - of the H/PETEs felt they needed support in this regard, this should be a key focus for the field.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条