EU Cross-Border Gathering and Admissibility of Electronic Content Data

被引:0
|
作者
Kusak, Martyna [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Adam Mickiewicz Univ, Fac Law & Adm, Poznan, Poland
[2] Univ Ghent, Inst Int Res Criminal Policy IRCP, Dept Criminol Criminal Law & Social Law, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
electronic content data; mutual admissibility of evidence; Regulation (EU) 2023/1543; European Investigation Order; common EU minimum standards; electronic evidence;
D O I
10.1163/15718174-BJA10054
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Electronic content data is a goldmine of data and information that may be relevant for a criminal investigation. Yet, these data are difficult to fit into the traditional set of evidence, and Member States use various approaches to its gathering and use. This makes the EU cross-border exchange of electronic content data context-sensitive, multilayered, ambiguous; as well as it involves the risks of privacy violations and inadmissibility concerns. Therefore, in order to achieve smooth collection and use of electronic content data, the EU needs to underpin the trust basis required for mutual recognition in this area. This study builds upon the line of research on art. 82.2 TFEU and its potential for implementing a real and multi-directional free movement of evidence regime. In this respect, it is aimed to identify common EU minimum standards for electronic content data, complemented with per se admissibility of evidence gathered accordingly. The study also advocates that with regard to electronic content data, the focus should switch from the specific measure to an overall data category. Such an approach does not intend to harmonise the methods of collecting electronic content data. Instead, any measure targeted at any electronic content data would have to meet an EU common minimum standard.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 155
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-border transports and cross-border mobility in EU border regions
    Medeiros, Eduardo
    [J]. CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2019, 7 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [2] EU Cross-Border Succession Law
    Pintens, Walter
    [J]. COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 2024, 61 (01):
  • [3] Cross-border Hot Pursuit in the EU
    Daman, Maarten
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CRIME CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2008, 16 (02) : 171 - 207
  • [4] EU Cross-Border Succession Law
    Christandl, Gregor
    Bariatti, Stefania
    Viarengo, Ilaria
    Villata, Francesca C.
    [J]. RABELS ZEITSCHRIFT FUR AUSLANDISCHES UND INTERNATIONALES PRIVATRECHT, 2023, 87 (04):
  • [5] Cross-Border Conversions in the EU: The EU Commission Proposal
    Garcimartin, Francisco
    Gandia, Enrique
    [J]. EUROPEAN COMPANY AND FINANCIAL LAW REVIEW, 2019, 16 (1-2): : 15 - 43
  • [6] CROSS-BORDER DATA COMPARISONS
    OJALA, M
    [J]. ONLINE, 1994, 18 (03): : 105 - 107
  • [7] Cross-border banking and financial stability in the EU
    Eisenbeis, Robert A.
    Kaufman, George G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2008, 4 (03) : 168 - 204
  • [8] EU health policy: cross-border controversies
    Riemer-Hommel, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2010, 14 : S1 - S1
  • [9] Cross-Border EU Competition Law Actions
    Lianos, Ioannis
    [J]. WORLD COMPETITION, 2014, 37 (02): : 265 - +
  • [10] Design Principles for EU Cross-Border Services
    Maierhofer, Sophie
    Schimpe, Simon
    [J]. ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT, EGOV 2022, 2022, 13391 : 93 - 105