Uncertainty quantification of structural blade parameters for the aeroelastic damping of wind turbines: a code-to-code comparison

被引:0
|
作者
Verdonck, Hendrik [1 ]
Hach, Oliver [1 ]
Polman, Jelmer D. [2 ]
Schramm, Otto [2 ]
Balzani, Claudio [2 ]
Mueller, Sarah [3 ]
Rieke, Johannes [3 ]
机构
[1] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Aeroelast, Gottingen, Germany
[2] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Wind Energy Syst, Hannover, Germany
[3] Nordex Energy SE & Co KG, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
GLOBAL SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; STABILITY; FIDELITY;
D O I
10.5194/wes-9-1747-2024
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a well-established category of methods to estimate the effect of parameter variations on a quantity of interest based on a solid mathematical foundation. In the wind energy field most UQ studies focus on the sensitivity of turbine loads. This article presents a framework, wrapped around a modern Python UQ library, to analyze the impact of uncertain turbine properties on aeroelastic stability. The UQ methodology applies a polynomial chaos expansion surrogate model. A comparison is made between different wind turbine simulation tools on the engineering model level (alaska/Wind, Bladed, HAWC2/HAWCStab2, and Simpack). Two case studies are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the method to analyze the sensitivity of the aeroelastic damping of an unstable turbine mode to variations of structural blade cross-section parameters. The code-to-code comparison shows good agreement between the simulation tools for the reference model, but also significant differences in the sensitivities.
引用
收藏
页码:1747 / 1763
页数:17
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] A Code-to-Code Comparison for Dynamic Modeling and Response Analysis of Offshore Wind Turbine Blade Mating Process
    Bhaskaran, Saravanan
    Verma, Amrit Shankar
    Yuan, Shuai
    Jiang, Zhiyu
    Halse, Karl Henning
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2023, 145 (06):
  • [2] Hydroelastic code-to-code comparison for a tension leg spar-type floating wind turbine
    Karimirad, Madjid
    Meissonnier, Quentin
    Gao, Zhen
    Moan, Torgeir
    [J]. MARINE STRUCTURES, 2011, 24 (04) : 412 - 435
  • [3] DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF BLADE MATING PROCESS USING JACK-UP CRANE VESSEL: A CODE-TO-CODE COMPARISON
    Bhaskaran, Saravanan
    Yuan, Shuai
    Halse, Karl Henning
    Verma, Amrit Shankar
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 41ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE & ARCTIC ENGINEERING, OMAE2022, VOL 8, 2022,
  • [4] Sensitivity Study of the Influence of Blade Sectional Stiffness Parameters on the Aeroelastic Response of Wind Turbines
    Chen, Cheng
    Wang, Tongguang
    Wang, Long
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 9
  • [5] Uncertainty Quantification of the Effects of Blade Damage on the Actual Energy Production of Modern Wind Turbines
    Papi, Francesco
    Cappugi, Lorenzo
    Salvadori, Simone
    Carnevale, Mauro
    Bianchini, Alessandro
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (15)
  • [6] Implicit Floquet analysis of wind turbines using tangent matrices of a non-linear aeroelastic code
    Skjoldan, P. F.
    Hansen, M. H.
    [J]. WIND ENERGY, 2012, 15 (02) : 275 - 287
  • [7] Comparison of Blade Aeroelastic Responses between Upwind and Downwind of 10 MW Wind Turbines under the Shear Wind Condition
    Kang, Haojie
    Xu, Bofeng
    Shen, Xiang
    Li, Zhen
    Cai, Xin
    Hu, Zhiqiang
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (06)
  • [8] Verification of interface between an aeroelastic code and a time domain Rankine solver for completing structural analysis of floating wind turbine foundation design
    Bakhshandehrostami, Ali
    Han, Kai-Jia
    Parkinson, Steven
    Alblas, Laurens
    Collier, William
    Sun, Flora C. W.
    [J]. EERA DEEPWIND'2021, 2021, 2018
  • [9] Wind Parameters Measurement Method for Design of Bridges in Mountainous Area and Comparison with Code-Recommended Values
    Bai H.-T.
    Zhang Z.-T.
    [J]. Bridge Construction, 2023, 53 (03) : 56 - 63