Deliberative process of health technology reassessment by health technology assessment agency in Korea

被引:0
|
作者
Shin, Sangjin [1 ]
Kim, Yunjung [1 ]
Choi, Jieun [1 ]
Park, Jung Yul [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Evidence Based Healthcare Collaborating Agcy, Div Healthcare Technol Assessment Res, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Anam Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
health technology reassessment; technology management; health insurance; clinical safety; in-use technology; recommendation;
D O I
10.1017/S026646232400014X
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In 2019, the National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA) in Korea established a health technology reassessment (HTR) system to manage the life cycle of health technologies and develop operational measures promoting the efficient use of healthcare resources. The purpose of this study is to introduce the detailed implementation process and practical functional methods of the HTR implemented by NECA.The HTR is a structured multidisciplinary method for analyzing health technologies currently used in the healthcare system based on the latest information on parameters, such as clinical safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of optimizing the use of healthcare resources as well as social and ethical issues. All decision-making stages of the HTR are carefully reviewed and transparently managed. The HTR committee makes significant decisions, and the subcommittee decides the details related to the assessment process.Since the pilot began in 2018, 262 cases have been reassessed, of which, 126 cases (48.1 percent) were health services not covered by the National Health Insurance (NHI). Over the past 5 years, approximately 130 recommendations for the in-use technologies were determined by the HTR committee. In the near future, it will be necessary to officially develop and establish a Korean HTR system and a legal foundation to optimize the NHI system.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, DELIBERATIVE PROCESS, AND ETHICALLY CONTESTED ISSUES
    Daniels, Norman
    van der Wilt, Gert Jan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2016, 32 (1-2) : 10 - 15
  • [2] EVIDENCE-INFORMED DELIBERATIVE PROCESS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN SPAIN
    Pinilla, P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S7 - S7
  • [3] Principles for deliberative processes in health technology assessment
    Bond, Kenneth
    Stiffell, Rebecca
    Ollendorf, Daniel A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 36 (04) : 445 - 452
  • [4] Health technology assessment in South Korea
    Kim, Chang-yup
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 25 : 219 - 223
  • [5] Health Technology Agency insights: informing modification of a qualitative benefit risk framework for Health Technology Reassessment of prescription medications
    Maloney, Mary Alison
    Schwartz, Lisa
    O'Reilly, Daria
    Levine, Mitchel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2019, 35 (05) : 384 - 392
  • [6] Deliberative processes in health technology assessment of medicines: the case of Spain
    Pinilla-Dominguez, Pilar
    Pinilla-Dominguez, Jaime
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [7] Health technology assessment: the process in Brazil
    Lessa, Fernanda
    Ferraz, Marcos Bosi
    [J]. REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 41
  • [8] AGENCY AGREEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REIMBURSEMENT DECISIONS
    Jaksa, A.
    Demb, J.
    Ho, Y. S.
    Daniel, K.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A3 - A3
  • [9] A systematic review on current status of health technology reassessment: insights for South Korea
    Seo, Hyun-Ju
    Park, Ji Jeong
    Lee, Seon Heui
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2016, 14
  • [10] Role of Health Technology Assessment in Drug Policies: Korea
    Bae, Eun-Young
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2019, 18 : 24 - 29