Impact of Climate Change on Electric Energy Production from Medium-Size Photovoltaic Module Systems Based on RCP Climate Scenarios

被引:2
|
作者
Bozsik, Nandor [1 ]
Szeberenyi, Andras [2 ,3 ]
Bozsik, Norbert [4 ]
机构
[1] Obuda Univ, Donat Bank Fac Mech & Safety Engn, H-1081 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Budapest Metropolitan Univ, Inst Commun & Mkt, H-1148 Budapest, Hungary
[3] Szechenyi Istvan Univ, Dept Int & Appl Econ, H-9026 Gyor, Hungary
[4] Hungarian Univ Agr & Life Sci, Inst Agr & Food Econ, H-2100 Godollo, Hungary
关键词
climate change; photovoltaic module system; electric energy production; efficiency; region; GREENHOUSE-GAS CONCENTRATIONS; SOLAR-ENERGY; FUTURE; STABILIZATION; TEMPERATURE; AREAS; WORLD; POWER;
D O I
10.3390/en17164009
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The impact of climate change is increasingly evident in various domains today and is gaining prominence in scientific inquiries. Climate change also affects the utilisation of renewable energies. The article examines the effects of 21st-century climate change on the annual electric energy production of medium-sized photovoltaic module systems. The study bases its analysis on three possible scenarios: a pessimistic (RCP 8.5), a less pessimistic (RCP 4.5), and an optimistic (RCP 2.6) scenario. The applied Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) scenarios were developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to enhance comparability in analyses related to climate change. Compared to older linear models, an innovation utilises a more flexible and multidirectional model. One of the article's key findings is that, for all three examined settlements, the annual yield of the studied photovoltaic systems will surpass the levels of the base year 2010 by the middle and end of the century. Another significant outcome is that, under the three scenarios analysed, the ratio of annual performance variation to annual global radiation variation shows substantial differences by the middle and end of the century compared to the 2010 baseline. In the optimistic scenario, this ratio exceeds 1, whereas in the pessimistic and less pessimistic scenarios, it falls below 1. This ratio does not directly inform about the annual production-which increases in all cases-but rather about the changes in efficiency. These efficiency changes are influenced by the rise in annual average temperatures and the fluctuation in sunny hours yearly. The third finding reveals that under the climate change pessimistic scenario (RCP 8.5), the efficiency decrease is less adverse than in the less pessimistic scenario (RCP 4.5).
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of the impacts of climate change on energy consumption for a medium-size office building with two climate models
    Wang, Liping
    Liu, Xiaohong
    Brown, Hunter
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 157 : 218 - 226
  • [2] Climate change impact assessment in residential buildings utilizing RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios
    Akgul, Cagla Meral
    Dino, Ipek Gursel
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2020, 35 (03): : 1665 - 1683
  • [3] Near-, medium- and long-term impacts of climate change on the thermal energy consumption of buildings in Finland under RCP climate scenarios
    Pulkkinen, Jari
    Louis, Jean-Nicolas
    Debusschere, Vincent
    Pongracz, Eva
    ENERGY, 2024, 302
  • [4] Impact of climate change on wind energy across North America under climate change scenario RCP8.5
    Li, Si Han
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2023, 288
  • [5] Assessment of climate change impact on the Gomti River basin in India under different RCP scenarios
    Das B.
    Jain S.K.
    Thakur P.K.
    Singh S.
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (2)
  • [6] Impact of climate change on the stream flow of the Arjo-Didessa catchment under RCP scenarios
    Bekele, Wudeneh Temesgen
    Haile, Alemseged Tamiru
    Rientjes, Tom
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2021, 12 (06) : 2325 - 2337
  • [7] Impacts of climate change on energy systems in global and regional scenarios
    Seleshi G. Yalew
    Michelle T. H. van Vliet
    David E. H. J. Gernaat
    Fulco Ludwig
    Ariel Miara
    Chan Park
    Edward Byers
    Enrica De Cian
    Franziska Piontek
    Gokul Iyer
    Ioanna Mouratiadou
    James Glynn
    Mohamad Hejazi
    Olivier Dessens
    Pedro Rochedo
    Robert Pietzcker
    Roberto Schaeffer
    Shinichiro Fujimori
    Shouro Dasgupta
    Silvana Mima
    Silvia R. Santos da Silva
    Vaibhav Chaturvedi
    Robert Vautard
    Detlef P. van Vuuren
    Nature Energy, 2020, 5 : 794 - 802
  • [8] Climate Change in Bosnia and Herzegovina According to Climate Scenario RCP8.5 and Possible Impact on Fruit Production
    Trbic, Goran
    Popov, Tatjana
    Djurdjevic, Vladimir
    Milunovic, Igor
    Dejanovic, Tihomir
    Gnjato, Slobodan
    Ivanisevic, Marko
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [9] Impacts of climate change on energy systems in global and regional scenarios
    Yalew, Seleshi G.
    van Vliet, Michelle T. H.
    Gernaat, David E. H. J.
    Ludwig, Fulco
    Miara, Ariel
    Park, Chan
    Byers, Edward
    De Cian, Enrica
    Piontek, Franziska
    Iyer, Gokul
    Mouratiadou, Ioanna
    Glynn, James
    Hejazi, Mohamad
    Dessens, Olivier
    Rochedo, Pedro
    Pietzcker, Robert
    Schaeffer, Roberto
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    Dasgupta, Shouro
    Mima, Silvana
    da Silva, Silvia R. Santos
    Chaturvedi, Vaibhav
    Vautard, Robert
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    NATURE ENERGY, 2020, 5 (10) : 794 - 802
  • [10] Assessment of the impact of climate change on future hydropower production from Koka Reservoir under two representative concentration pathways (RCP) emission scenarios
    Elias K.
    Miegel K.
    International Journal of Energy and Water Resources, 2018, 2 (1-4) : 49 - 62