Modeling Deep Disagreement in Default Logic

Default logic has been a very active research topic in artificial intelligence since the early 1980s, but has not received as much attention in the philosophical literature thus far. This paper shows one way in which the technical tools of artificial intelligence can be applied in contemporary epistemology by modeling a paradigmatic case of deep disagreement using default logic. In 1 model-building viewed as a kind of philosophical progress is briefly motivated, while C2 introduces the case of deep disagreement we aim to model. On the heels of this, 3 defines our formal framework, viz., a refined Horty-style default logic. 4 then uses the framework to model deep disagreement, and finally 5 provides a critical discussion of the result.