Perceptions and outcomes of a nationwide remote pharmacy mentorship program

IntroductionMentorship is crucial for professional development in health care. However, the outcomes of national remote mentorship programs in pharmacy remain largely unexplored. This study evaluates the perceptions and experiences of student pharmacists, residents, fellows, and nontrainee pharmacists in such a program.ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the perceptions and outcomes of a nationwide remote pharmacy mentorship program designed for student pharmacists, residents, and fellows. It explores the efficacy, benefits, and barriers within a national pharmacy professional organization mentorship program.MethodsThe mentor and mentee experiences in the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) Ambulatory Care Practice and Research Network (PRN) from program years 2019-2022 were assessed using an anonymous online survey, employing a mixed-methods approach. The survey featured quantitative Likert scale and qualitative free-response questions. In addition, publicly available online sources provided data for postprogram placement outcomes of learner participants in the program. Summary statistics were computed from the quantitative data, and content analysis was applied to the qualitative data.ResultsOf the 356 invited program participants, 48 mentors (32.7%) and 18 mentees (8.6%) responded to the survey. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed on the program's effectiveness, contributing to a high postprogram placement rate in residencies and ambulatory care positions, emphasizing the program's success in supporting career progression. Respondents recognized significant benefits like career development and professional satisfaction. Notable demographic disparities, especially in age, gender, and race, were observed among participants. The study also identified logistical challenges that impeded the program's full potential.ConclusionDespite limitations, including a low number of responses, the study revealed that remote mentorship may positively affect professional development and well-being. The data supports the program-impacted respondent involvement and professional growth. Moreover, these findings suggest the need for further research to address the program barriers and disparities in participation.