Researcher, research thyself? Mapping the landscape of canine health and welfare research funding provided by UK not-for-profit organisations from 2012-2022

被引:2
|
作者
Skipper, Alison M. [1 ]
Packer, Rowena M. A. [2 ]
O'Neill, Dan G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Vet Coll, Dept Pathobiol & Populat Sci, Hawkshead Lane,North Mymms, Hatfield, England
[2] Royal Vet Coll, Dept Clin Sci & Serv, Hawkshead Lane,North Mymms, Hatfield, Herts, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0303498
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Research into canine health and welfare is supported by Government, charitable and private UK funding organisations. However, there is no current overall visibility or coordination of these funding activities, potentially compromising optimal distribution of limited resources. This study aimed to survey UK canine health and welfare funding by not-for-profit funders between 2012 and 2022, providing a novel baseline analysis to inform future sector stakeholder priorities. Results Funding data were collected from 10 wide-scope funders (UK Government funding councils and medical charities), 18 animal-directed funders (organisations specifically concerned with animal health and welfare) and 81 breed community groups. These 109 UK funders together provided traceable canine-relevant funding of 57.8 pound million during the surveyed period, comprising 684 individual grant awards supporting over 500 separate research projects. Wide-scope funders contributed 41.2 pound million (71.2% of total funding); animal-directed organisations, 16.3 pound million (28.1% of total funding); and breed-specific groups, 370K pound (0.6% of total funding). Individual grants ranged from 2.3 pound million to 300 pound. Funding patterns varied between sectors. Animal-directed funders provided 14.7 pound million of canine-relevant research funding that foregrounded the dog, 73% of all such funding; wide-scope funders provided 17.5 pound million of canine-relevant One Health research funding, 97% of all such funding. Customised metrics developed for this study assessed the 'benefit to the dog' and 'pathway to impact' of individual research projects. Overall, studies supported by animal-directed funders achieved significantly higher 'benefit to the dog' scores (Mann-Whitney U = 45235, p<0.001) and 'pathway to impact' scores (Mann-Whitney U = 43506.5, p<0.001) than those supported by wide-scope funders. Conclusion The landscape of UK not-for-profit funding of canine health and welfare research is complex, with considerable variation between providers. Although wide-scope funders provide the majority of overall canine-relevant research funding, animal-directed funders provide the majority of canine-focused funding and support research with greater direct impact on canine welfare. Visibility of past funding patterns will enable stakeholders in this sector to make more informed decisions about future research.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Mapping the health science librarianship research field in 2012-2022
    Li, Vinson
    JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN HEALTH LIBRARIES ASSOCIATION, 2022, 43 (03): : 93 - 103
  • [2] "Maybe we should think outside the box?" prioritisation of issues with UK not-for-profit canine health and welfare research funding using Delphi expert consensus and gap analysis
    Skipper, Alison M.
    Packer, Rowena M. A.
    O'Neill, Dan G.
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (12):