Surveillance and source tracking of foodborne pathogens in the vegetable production systems of India

被引:4
|
作者
Mohanapriya, Rangasamy [1 ]
Paranidharan, Vaikuntavasan [2 ]
Karthikeyan, Subburamu [1 ]
Balachandar, Dananjeyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Dept Agr Microbiol, Coimbatore 641003, India
[2] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Dept Plant Pathol, Coimbatore 641003, India
关键词
Fresh vegetables; Foodborne pathogens; Microbial risk assessment; Pre-harvest contamination; Source-tracking; LEAFY GREEN VEGETABLES; ESCHERICHIA-COLI STEC; FRESH PRODUCE; IRRIGATION WATER; INDICATOR MICROORGANISMS; MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY; PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA; UNITED-STATES; RISK-FACTORS; FOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110427
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Fresh vegetables are prone to foodborne pathogen infection due to improper cultivation methods and poor postharvest handling practices. This paper describes the prevalence of foodborne pathogens in three vegetables (tomato, brinjal, and lablab) cultivated by small-scale producers (SSP) of India. We assessed the possible entry of pathogens into the vegetable production chain. Samples from soil, manure, irrigation water, harvesting bins, and workers ' hands were assessed as sources of possible pathogen entry. In addition, further sampling was done to determine prevalence of these pathogens in the produce from the agricultural fields and markets. Total plate counts, yeast and mold count, total coliforms like general microbial indices, and possible foodborne pathogens like Salmonella , Escherichia coli O157, Staphylococcus aureus , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and norovirus were assessed in all the samples by standard microbiological, biochemical, and molecular methods. The results revealed that among the three vegetables we studied, brinjal had the highest load of general microbial indicators. Moreover, the total coliforms count of market vegetables was higher than that of on -farm vegetables, indicating poor hygiene in post -harvest operations. The pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa was found in the market tomatoes (0.35 log 10 cfu/g), and E. coli was detected in the market samples of brinjal (2.98 -3.89 log 10 cfu/g) and lablab (0.59 -2.21 log 10 cfu/g), thereby revealing fecal cross -contamination during pre or post -harvest operations. None of the vegetable samples were contaminated with E. coli O157:H7, Staphylococcus aureus , Salmonella sp., and norovirus. However, the microbiological source tracking of primary production farms showed that E. coli O157: H7 was present in manure (9/27), soil (6/27), harvest bins (6/27), and irrigation water samples (3/27) of SSP farms. In addition, soil (33%), manure (11%), and harvest bins (11%) had Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In conclusion, our study suggests that adequate knowledge of good agricultural practices for small-scale producers to cultivate microbiologically safe vegetable production and proper handling strategies for vegetable vendors is crucial to mitigate foodborne pathogen outbreaks through fresh vegetables.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Injured Foodborne Pathogens in the Vegetable Production Process
    Kijima, Nobuyuki
    Minato, Keiko
    Honjoh, Ken-ichi
    Maeda, Masayuki
    JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE SOCIETY FOR FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-NIPPON SHOKUHIN KAGAKU KOGAKU KAISHI, 2018, 65 (04): : 205 - 211
  • [2] Monitoring Foodborne Pathogens in Agricultural Water for Vegetable Production
    Chevez, Zoila R.
    Dunn, Laurel L.
    da Silva, Andre
    Rodigues, Camila
    HORTSCIENCE, 2023, 58 (09) : SR14 - SR14
  • [3] Foodborne pathogens in horticultural production systems: Ecology and mitigation
    Hoagland, Lori
    Ximenes, Eduardo
    Ku, Seockmo
    Ladisch, Michael
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2018, 236 : 192 - 206
  • [4] Genomic Surveillance of Foodborne Pathogens: Advances and Obstacles
    Gensheimer, Kathleen
    Allard, Marc W.
    Timme, Ruth E.
    Brown, Eric
    Hintz, Leslie
    Pettengill, Jamie
    Strain, Errol
    Tallent, Sandra M.
    Velez, Lili F.
    King, Ewa
    Shea, Sharon L.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2025, 31 (03): : 351 - 359
  • [5] Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Foodborne Pathogens in Organic or Natural Production Systems: An Overview
    Jacob, Megan E.
    Fox, James Trent
    Reinstein, Shelby L.
    Nagaraja, T. G.
    FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE, 2008, 5 (06) : 721 - 730
  • [6] Significance of whole genome sequencing for surveillance, source attribution and microbial risk assessment of foodborne pathogens
    Franz, Eelco
    Gras, Lapo Mughini
    Dallman, Tim
    CURRENT OPINION IN FOOD SCIENCE, 2016, 8 : 74 - 79
  • [7] Rabbit meat as a source of bacterial foodborne pathogens
    Rodríguez-Calleja, JM
    García-López, I
    García-López, ML
    Santos, JA
    Otero, A
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2006, 69 (05) : 1106 - 1112
  • [8] Surveillance of Foodborne Pathogens: Towards Diagnostic Metagenomics of Fecal Samples
    Andersen, Sandra Christine
    Hoorfar, Jeffrey
    GENES, 2018, 9 (01):
  • [9] Irrigation water as source of foodborne pathogens on fruit and vegetables
    Steele, M
    Odumeru, J
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2004, 67 (12) : 2839 - 2849
  • [10] Integrating the surveillance of animal health, foodborne pathogens and foodborne diseases in developing and in-transition countries
    de Balogh, K.
    Halliday, J.
    Lubroth, J.
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2013, 32 (02): : 539 - 548