Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Australian veterinary diagnostic laboratories

被引:6
|
作者
Hardefeldt, L. Y. [1 ,2 ]
Marenda, M. [1 ]
Crabb, H. [1 ,2 ]
Stevenson, M. A. [1 ]
Gilkerson, J. R. [1 ]
Billman-Jacobe, H. [1 ,2 ]
Browning, G. F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Vet Sch, Fac Vet & Agr Sci, Asia Pacific Ctr Anim Hlth,Dept Vet Biosci, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Peter Doherty Inst, Natl Ctr Antimicrobial Stewardship, Parkville, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial stewardship; diagnostic laboratories; microbiology; susceptibility testing; RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; LIVESTOCK; CARRIAGE; ANIMALS; HORSES;
D O I
10.1111/avj.12685
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe national strategy for tackling antimicrobial resistance highlights the need for antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary practice and for surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility in veterinary pathogens. Diagnostic laboratories have an important role in facilitating both of these processes, but it is unclear whether data from veterinary diagnostic laboratories are similar enough to allow for compilation and if there is consistent promotion of appropriate antimicrobial use embedded in the approaches of different laboratories to susceptibility testing. MethodsA cross-sectional study of antimicrobial susceptibility testing and reporting procedures by Australian veterinary diagnostic laboratories was conducted in 2017 using an online questionnaire. All 18 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in Australia completed the questionnaire. ResultsKirby-Bauer disc diffusion was the method predominantly used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing and was used to evaluate 86% of all isolates, although two different protocols were used across the 18 laboratories (CLSI 15/18, CDS 3/18). Minimum inhibitory concentrations were never reported by 61% of laboratories. Common isolates were consistently reported on across all species, except for gram-negative isolates in pigs, for which there was some variation in the approach to reporting. There was considerable diversity in the panels of antimicrobials used for susceptibility testing on common isolates and no consistency was apparent between laboratories for any bacterial species. ConclusionWe recommend that nationally agreed and consistent antimicrobial panels for routine susceptibility testing should be developed and a uniform set of guidelines should be adopted by veterinary diagnostic laboratories in Australia.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 146
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Harmonization of antimicrobial susceptibility testing among veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the five Nordic countries
    Petersen, A
    Aarestrup, FM
    Hofshagen, M
    Sipilä, H
    Franklin, A
    Gunnarsson, E
    [J]. MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE, 2003, 9 (04) : 381 - 388
  • [2] A survey of methods used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing in veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States
    Dargatz, David A.
    Erdman, Matthew M.
    Harris, Beth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2017, 29 (05) : 669 - 675
  • [3] Special report - Survey of antimicrobial susceptibility testing practices of veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States
    Brooks, MB
    Morley, PS
    Dargatz, DA
    Hyatt, DR
    Salman, MD
    Akey, BL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 222 (02) : 168 - 173
  • [5] Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria of Veterinary Origin
    Watts, Jeffrey L.
    Sweeney, Michael T.
    Lubbers, Brian V.
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2018, 6 (02):
  • [6] The role of veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the fight against antimicrobial resistance
    Hendrix, G. Kenitra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2018, 30 (06) : 805 - 806
  • [7] IMPROVED ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING IN CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY LABORATORIES
    THRUPP, LD
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MEDICINE, 1970, 113 (01): : 52 - &
  • [8] KN Veterinary Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (VetCAST)
    Mevius, D.
    Damborg, P.
    Toutain, P-L
    Guardabassi, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 38 : 50 - 51
  • [9] The future of veterinary diagnostic laboratories
    Bellamy, JEC
    Nielsen, NO
    [J]. CANADIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL-REVUE VETERINAIRE CANADIENNE, 2004, 45 (04): : 342 - 342
  • [10] Integrating Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratories for Emergency Use Testing during Pandemics
    Hodges, Natasha F.
    Sparrer, McKenzie
    Sherman, Tyler
    Mayer, Treana
    Adney, Danielle R.
    Ragan, Izabela
    Carpenter, Molly
    Mayo, Christie
    Webb, Tracy L.
    [J]. EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 30 (02) : 386 - 388