Governance and Accountability in a Saudi Public Healthcare Setting: Patients' Perspectives

被引:0
|
作者
AL Rahahleh, Naseem [1 ]
Alhothaly, Waad [2 ]
Al-Hanawi, Mohammed Khaled [3 ]
Al-Khyal, Tawfeek A. [4 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Econ & Adm, Finance Dept, POB 80092, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Abdullah Med City, Nursing Qual Dept, POB 57657, Mecca 21955, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Econ, Dept Hlth Serv & Hosp Adm, Box 80092, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Econ & Adm, Accounting Dept, POB 80092, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Accountability dimensions; patient perspectives; King Abdullah Medical City (KAMC); healthcare; SEM; and patients' perspectives; SERVICE QUALITY; BANGLADESH; HOSPITALS;
D O I
10.17576/AJAG-2024-21-01
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Accountability (a subset of governance) has become an important aspect of public service reform, and a higher level of accountability has been cited as a factor in improving the efficiency of healthcare systems. In that general context, accountability is explored in public health organizations through a case study of King Abdullah Medical City (KAMC) in Mecca. The study focuses on identifying key dimensions that influence accountability from the perspective of outpatients in relation to four overarching concerns (dimensions): Medical Professionals, Administration and Management, Legal Enforcement and Ethical Issues, and Government Action. The analysis is based on quantitative data collected from 440 KAMC outpatients using an online survey questionnaire designed especially for this study. The study's main findings indicate that with the exception of Administration and Management, all the accountability dimensions showed a high level of agreement from patients that indicated a satisfactory level of accountability at KAMC. However, Administration and Management was found to be an area in need of significant improvement at the focal institution. Further, the findings underscore the effectiveness of government action, as supported by Vision 2030 in the context of KAMC, in contrast with the findings of other studies in which the challenges related to government initiatives are emphasized (e.g., Nurunnabi & Islam, 2012).
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rethinking of the UK strategic public decision: Outsourcing, accountability, and governance perspectives
    Alkaraan, Fadi
    Floyd, David
    STRATEGIC CHANGE-BRIEFINGS IN ENTREPRENEURIAL FINANCE, 2020, 29 (06): : 625 - 632
  • [2] Governance and Accountability of Public Risk
    Andreeva, Galina
    Ansell, Jake
    Harrison, Tina
    FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY & MANAGEMENT, 2014, 30 (03) : 342 - 361
  • [3] TRANSPARENCY, ACCOUNTABILITY AND PUBLIC GOVERNANCE
    Martins, Simone
    Carvalho Teixeira, Marco Antonio
    Nebot, Carmen Pineda
    Pena Lopez, Maria Alejandra
    ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA E GESTAO SOCIAL, 2018, 10 (04): : 226 - 227
  • [4] Public sector governance and accountability
    Almquist, Roland
    Grossi, Giuseppe
    van Heiden, G. Jan
    Reichard, Christoph
    CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, 2013, 24 (7-8) : 479 - 487
  • [5] Governance of mental healthcare: Fragmented accountability
    Wiktorowicz, Mary E.
    Di Pierdomenico, Kaitlin
    Buckley, Neil J.
    Lurie, Steve
    Czukar, Gail
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2020, 256
  • [7] Critical perspectives on NGO governance and accountability
    Belal, Ataur
    Thomson, Ian
    Cordery, Carolyn
    CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, 2023, 92
  • [8] Accountability and Public Governance in Greater China
    Chan, Hon S.
    Su, Tsai-Tsu
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2009, 68 : S1 - S4
  • [9] Independence and accountability in public and private governance
    Anand, Anita
    Sossin, Lorne
    CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, 2018, 61 : 15 - 35
  • [10] Public Crisis Governance and Accountability System
    Zhang Hai-bo
    Tong Xing
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (5TH), VOL III, 2009, : 413 - 418