The state of Continuing Professional Development in East and Southeast Asia among the medical practitioners

被引:0
|
作者
Samarasekera, Dujeepa [1 ]
Lee, Shuh Shing [1 ]
Yeo, Su Ping [1 ]
Chen, Julie [2 ]
Findyartini, Ardi [3 ,4 ]
Greviana, Nadia [3 ,4 ]
Wiweko, Budi [3 ,5 ]
Nadarajah, Vishna Devi [6 ,7 ]
Thuraisingham, Chandramani [8 ]
Yang, Jen-Hung [9 ,10 ,11 ]
Sherman, Lawrence [12 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Ctr Med Educ, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ Hong Kong, LKS Fac Med, Bau Inst Med & Hlth Sci Educ, Dept Family Med & Primary Care, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Indonesia, Fac Med, Indonesia Med Educ & Res Inst IMERI, Med Educ Ctr, Jakarta, Indonesia
[4] Univ Indonesia, Fac Med, Dept Med Educ, Jakarta, Indonesia
[5] Univ Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Fac Med, Jakarta, Indonesia
[6] Int Med Univ, IMU Ctr Educ, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[7] Int Med Univ, Sch Med, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[8] Int Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[9] Chung Shan Med Univ, Coll Med, Med Educ & Humanities Res Ctr, Taichung, Taiwan
[10] Chung Shan Med Univ, Inst Med, Coll Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[11] Chung Shan Med Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Taichung, Taiwan
[12] Meducate Global Llc, St Petersburg, FL USA
来源
ASIA PACIFIC SCHOLAR | 2024年 / 9卷 / 03期
关键词
Medical Education; Health Profession Education; Continuing Professional Development; Continuing Medical Education; Accreditation; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.29060/TAPS.2024-9-3/OA3045
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction: Continuing medical education and continuing professional development activities (CME/CPD) improve the practice of medical practitioners and allowing them to deliver quality clinical care. However, the systems that oversee CME/CPD as well as the processes around design, delivery, and accreditation vary widely across countries. This study explores the state of CME/CPD in the East and South East Asian region from the perspective of medical practitioners, and makes recommendations for improvement. Methods: A multi-centre study was conducted across five institutions in Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan. The study instrument was a 28-item (27 five-point Likert scale and 1 open-ended items) validated questionnaire that focused on perceptions of the current content, processes and gaps in CME/CPD and further contextualised by educational experts from each participating site. Descriptive analysis was undertaken for quantitative data while the data from open-ended item was categorised into similar categories. Results: A total of 867 medical practitioners participated in the study. For perceptions on current CME/CPD programme, 75.34% to 88.00% of respondents agreed that CME/CPD increased their skills and competence in providing quality clinical care. For the domain on pharmaceutical industry-supported CME/CPD, the issue of commercial influence was apparent with only 30.24%56.92% of respondents believing that the CME/CPD in their institution was free from commercial bias. Key areas for improvement for future CME/CPD included 1) content and mode of delivery, 2) independence and funding, 3) administration, 4) location and accessibility and 5) policy and collaboration. Conclusion: Accessible, practice-relevant content using diverse learning modalities offered by unbiased content providers and subject to transparent and rigorous accreditation processes with minimal administrative hassle are the main considerations for CME/CPD participants.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条