Antireflux mucosectomy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: efficacy and the mechanism of action

被引:0
|
作者
Kuipers, Thijs [1 ,2 ]
Nijhuis, Renske A. B. Oude [1 ,2 ]
Pouw, Roos E. [1 ,2 ]
Bredenoord, Albert J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Amsterdam UMC, Locat AMC, Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Gastroenterol Endocrinol Metab, Gastroenterol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER; ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION; RELAXATIONS; MANAGEMENT; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1055/a-2333-5232
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Previous studies suggested that antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is effective in reducing reflux symptoms and total acid exposure, although the mechanism is unknown. Our objective was to investigate the effect of ARMS on reflux parameters and its mechanism of action. Methods Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with insufficient symptom control despite a twice-daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) underwent a piecemeal multiband mucosectomy of 50% of the circumference of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), extending 2 cm into the cardia. The primary end point was the total number of reflux episodes during 24-hour pH-impedance studies. Results 11 patients (8 men; median age 37 [interquartile range (IQR) 32-57] years) were treated, with one patient subsequently lost to follow-up. ARMS reduced the median (IQR) number of total reflux episodes (74 [60-82] vs. 37 [28-66]; P = 0.008) and total acid exposure time (8.7% [6.4%-12.7%] vs. 5.3% [3.5%-6.7%]; P = 0.03). Treatment reduced the median (IQR) number of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) during a 90-minute postprandial period (4 [1-8] vs. 2 [1-4]; P = 0.03) and reflux symptom scores (3.6 [3.6-3.9] vs. 1.6 [0.7-2.7]; P = 0.005). Treatment did not increase the mean (SD) dysphagia scores (8.2 [7.3] vs. 8.5 [6.5]) or change the EGJ distensibility on impedance planimetry (4.4 [2.1] vs. 4.3 [2.2] mm2/mmHg). One delayed post-procedural bleed requiring repeat endoscopy occurred (10%); no strictures developed. Conclusion ARMS is an effective treatment option in PPI-refractory GERD, reducing acid exposure, reflux episodes, and symptoms. While its working mechanism could not be explained by a difference in distensibility, a reduction in TLESRs might play a role.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 905
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-term efficacy of antireflux mucosectomy in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Sumi, Kazuya
    Inoue, Haruhiro
    Ando, Ryohei
    Fujiyoshi, Mary Raina Angeli
    Fujiyoshi, Yusuke
    Tanabe, Mayo
    Shimamura, Yuto
    Onimaru, Manabu
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 36 (03) : 305 - 313
  • [2] ANTIREFLUX SURGERY FOR SYMPTOMATIC GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX - MECHANISM OF ACTION
    FISHER, RS
    MALMUD, LS
    LOBIS, IF
    MAIER, WP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 1978, 23 (02): : 152 - 160
  • [3] Antireflux mucosectomy for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease following peroral endoscopic myotomy
    Tomida, Hideomi
    Tange, Kazuhiro
    Ikeda, Yoshiou
    Hiasa, Yoichi
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2025,
  • [4] Antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and antireflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rodriguez de Santiago, Enrique
    Sanchez-Vegazo, Carlos Teruel
    Penas, Beatriz
    Shimamura, Yuto
    Tanabe, Mayo
    Alvarez-Diaz, Noelia
    Parejo, Sofia
    Kazuya, Sumi
    Marcos-Carrasco, Natalia
    Vazquez-Sequeiros, Enrique
    Inoue, Haruhiro
    Albillos, Agustin
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2021, 09 (11) : E1740 - E1751
  • [5] Underwater Antireflux Mucosectomy for Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Rapid and Simple Technique for Endoscopic Treatment
    Deng, Chao
    Wu, Suhua
    Xu, Feng
    Zhou, Zhihang
    Chen, Zhiji
    Mei, Zhechuan
    He, Song
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : 1735 - 1736
  • [6] Comparative clinical feasibility of antireflux mucosectomy and antireflux mucosal ablation in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Retrospective cohort study
    Lee, Ah Young
    Kim, Seong Hwan
    Cho, Joo Young
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 36 (12) : 1328 - 1337
  • [7] Antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Schneider P.M.
    Grimminger P.P.
    Der Gastroenterologe, 2016, 11 (2): : 125 - 131
  • [8] Evaluation of Antireflux Mucosectomy for Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Medium-Term Results of a Pilot Study
    Laquiere, Arthur
    Trottier-Tellier, Felix
    Urena-Campos, Romina
    Lienne, Pascal
    Lecomte, Laurence
    Katsogiannou, Maria
    Penaranda, Guillaume
    Boustiere, Christian
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2022, 2022
  • [9] Outcomes of Endoscopic Antireflux Mucosectomy for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Galvarini, Martin
    Angeramo, Cristian A.
    Kerman, Javier
    Balmaceda, Ruben
    Debes, Ignacio
    Herbella, Fernando A. M.
    Schlottmann, Francisco
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 58 (09) : 851 - 856
  • [10] Chronic cough due to gastroesophageal reflux disease - Efficacy of antireflux surgery
    Novitsky, YW
    Zawacki, JK
    Irwin, RS
    French, CT
    Hussey, VM
    Callery, MP
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (04): : 567 - 571