Syntactic and emotional interplay in second language: emotional resonance but not proficiency modulates affective influences on L2 syntactic processing

被引:0
|
作者
Bermudez-Margaretto, Beatriz [1 ,2 ]
Beltran, David [3 ]
de Vega, Marta [1 ]
Fernandez, Angel [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Sanchez, Maria Jesus [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, Fac Psicol, Dept Psicol Basica Psicobiol & Metodol Ciencias Co, Salamanca, Spain
[2] Univ Salamanca, Inst Integrac Comunidad INICO, Salamanca, Spain
[3] Univ Nacl Educ Distancia UNED, Fac Psicol, Dept Psicol Basica 1, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ La Laguna, Inst Univ Neurociencia IUNE, San Cristobal la Laguna, Spain
[5] Univ Salamanca, Fac Filol, Dept Filol Inglesa, Salamanca, Spain
关键词
Syntax; emotional resonance; bilingualism; GENDER AGREEMENT; BILINGUAL SPEAKERS; WORDS; LANGUAGE; 1ST; EMBODIMENT; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1080/02699931.2024.2374038
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous research has demonstrated the influence of emotions during linguistic processing, indicating the interactivity of both processes in the brain. However, little is known regarding such interplay in a second language (L2). This study addressed this question by examining the reading effects of syntactic violations while processing L2 emotional and neutral statements. Forty-six Spanish-English bilinguals with various levels of L2 proficiency and emotional resonance (i.e. capability for emotional experience in L2) were presented with a self-paced sentence reading task. Sentences contained positive (16), neutral (16) and negative (16) verbs, half of them presented in agreement and half in disagreement with the preceding pronoun. Analysis of verb reading times using linear mixed effects modelling revealed a significant interaction between syntactic violation, verb valence and emotional resonance, suggesting that stronger emotional L2 experience results in a higher saliency of negative verbs, reducing the impact of syntactic violations.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Age of acquisition and proficiency on L2 syntactic processing
    Diaz, Begona
    Galles, Sebastian Nuria
    Erdozia, Kepa
    Mueller, L. Jutta
    Laka, Itziar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 91 - 91
  • [2] Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels
    van Hell, Janet G.
    Tokowicz, Natasha
    [J]. SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH, 2010, 26 (01) : 43 - 74
  • [3] ERP correlates of age and proficiency in L2 processing of syntactic and inflectional information
    Kessler, K
    Martohardjono, G
    Shafer, V
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH ANNUAL BOSTON UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 294 - 305
  • [4] Lexico-syntactic interactions in the resolution of relative clause ambiguities in a second language (L2): The role of cognate status and L2 proficiency
    Soares, Ana Paula
    Oliveira, Helena Mendes
    Comesana, Montserrat
    Costa, Ana Santos
    [J]. PSICOLOGICA, 2018, 39 (02): : 164 - 197
  • [5] Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels
    Hao, Yuxin
    Wang, Xuelin
    Wu, Meng
    Liu, Haitao
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [6] Context effects in language comprehension: The role of emotional state and attention on semantic and syntactic processing
    Chwilla, Dorothee J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [7] Syntactic complexity in second language (L2) writing: Comparing students' narrative and argumentative essays
    Zheng, Yan
    Barrot, Jessie S.
    [J]. SYSTEM, 2024, 123
  • [8] LEXICAL AND SYNTACTIC CONGRUENCY IN L2 PREDICTIVE GENDER PROCESSING
    Hopp, Holger
    Lemmerth, Natalia
    [J]. STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2018, 40 (01) : 171 - 199
  • [9] Syntactic reanalysis and lingering misinterpretations in L2 sentence processing
    Lee, Jonghyeon
    Shin, Jeong-Ah
    [J]. LINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 33 : 53 - 79
  • [10] A critical review of ERP and fMRI evidence on L2 syntactic processing
    Kotz, Sonja A.
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2009, 109 (2-3) : 68 - 74