Coproducing a physical activity referral scheme in Germany: a qualitative analysis of stakeholder experiences

被引:0
|
作者
Klamroth, Sarah [1 ]
Mino, Eriselda [1 ]
Naber, Inga [1 ]
Weissenfels, Anja [1 ]
Geidl, Wolfgang [1 ]
Gelius, Peter [2 ]
Abu-Omar, Karim [1 ]
Pfeifer, Klaus [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Sport Sci & Sport, Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Lausanne, Inst Sport Sci, Lausanne, Switzerland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 05期
关键词
qualitative research; health services; primary health care; patient participation; CARE; PROMOTION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082710
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study evaluated stakeholders' experiences of participating in a coproduction process to develop a physical activity referral scheme (PARS) in the German healthcare system. The focus was on examining facilitators and challenges, along with gathering insights on potential modifications to the joint development process, all from the viewpoint of stakeholders.Design This qualitative study employed one-to-one semi-structured interviews, and the findings were analysed using summarising qualitative content analysis.Setting The study focused on the German healthcare system.Participants Seven stakeholders from the coproduction process were purposefully selected for interviews using maximum variation sampling. The interviewees represented different sectors (physician associations, physical activity professionals' associations, health insurance companies and patient organisations), various positions within their organisations, and different levels of attendance during the coproduction process.Results In almost all interviews, the following factors were highlighted as facilitators of the development process: coproduction approach, process of coproduction, multi-sector stakeholder group, possibility of active participation, coordinating role of researchers, communication, atmosphere and interaction. In contrast, differences in roles and hierarchy, merging of different perspectives, clarification of intervention costs, and competition and conflicting interests were pointed out as challenges. Only a few suggestions regarding adaptations in terms of group composition and cooperation among stakeholders were mentioned.Conclusions Stakeholder experiences with the joint development process were predominantly positive, indicating that coproduction is a beneficial approach for the development of PARS intended for integration into healthcare systems. The effective management of power differences among stakeholders is intricately tied to the coproduction method; therefore, it should be selected carefully. The research team plays a pivotal role in coordinating and negotiating the process, and the team should be equipped with a diverse set of skills and knowledge, particularly to understand the intricacies of the healthcare system where the PARS is intended for implementation.Trial registration number NCT04947787.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Facilitating adherence to physical activity: exercise professionals' experiences of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales. a qualitative study
    Graham F Moore
    Laurence Moore
    Simon Murphy
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 11
  • [2] Facilitating adherence to physical activity: exercise professionals' experiences of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales. a qualitative study
    Moore, Graham F.
    Moore, Laurence
    Murphy, Simon
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11
  • [3] Gaining qualitative insight into the subjective experiences of adherers to an exercise referral scheme: A thematic analysis
    Eynon, Michael John
    O'Donnell, Christopher
    Williams, Lynn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 23 (11) : 1476 - 1487
  • [4] Are physical activity referral scheme components associated with increased physical activity, scheme uptake, and adherence rate? A meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Mino, Eriselda
    Pfeifer, Klaus
    Hanson, Coral L.
    Schuler, Michael
    Brandmeier, Anna
    Klamroth, Sarah
    Naber, Inga
    Weissenfels, Anja
    McHale, Sheona
    Abu-Omar, Karim
    Gelius, Peter
    Whiting, Stephen
    Wickramasinghe, Kremlin
    Galea, Gauden
    Geidl, Wolfgang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [5] Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Physical Activity Referral Scheme Among Women
    Galaviz, Karla
    Levesque, Lucie
    Kotecha, Jyoti
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRIMARY CARE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2013, 4 (03): : 167 - 171
  • [6] Making a move in exercise referral: co-development of a physical activity referral scheme
    Buckley, B. J. R.
    Thijssen, D. H. J.
    Murphy, R. C.
    Graves, L. E. F.
    Whyte, G.
    Gillison, F. B.
    Crone, D.
    Wilson, P. M.
    Watson, P. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 40 (04) : E586 - E593
  • [7] Experiences of an exercise referral scheme from the perspective of people with chronic stroke: a qualitative study
    Sharma, Helen
    Bulley, Cathy
    van Wijck, Frederike M. J.
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2012, 98 (04) : 341 - 348
  • [8] Adolescent Girls' Experiences With Sport Participation And Intentions For Future Physical Activity: A Qualitative Analysis
    Hopkins, Casey S.
    Hopkins, Chris
    [J]. MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2022, 54 (09) : 129 - 129
  • [9] THE IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS OF AN EXERCISE REFERRAL SCHEME USING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY COUNSELING
    Daniels, Bryce
    Howie, Erin
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2023, 57 : S621 - S621
  • [10] Australian patients' perception of the efficacy of the physical activity referral scheme (PARS)
    Albert, Francis A.
    Malau-Aduli, Aduli E. O.
    Crowe, Melissa J.
    Malau-Aduli, Bunmi S.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (11) : 2803 - 2813