The value of seabird foraging ranges as a tool to investigate potential interactions with offshore wind farms

被引:0
|
作者
Woodward, Ian D. [1 ]
Thaxter, Chris B. [1 ]
Owen, Ellie [2 ]
Bolton, Mark [3 ]
Ward, Robin M. [4 ]
Cook, Aonghais S. C. P. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] British Trust Ornithol, Thetford, Norfolk, England
[2] North Scotland Off, RSPB Ctr Conservat Sci, Inverness, Scotland
[3] RSPB Ctr Conservat Sci, Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire, Scotland
[4] NIRAS Grp UK Ltd, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, England
[5] Biodivers Consultancy Ltd, 3E Kings Parade, Cambridge CB2 1SJ, England
关键词
VULNERABILITY; POPULATIONS; FRAMEWORK; TRACKING; DENSITY; GROWTH; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107192
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
One of the key emerging pressures facing seabird populations is the development of offshore wind farms (OWFs). Estimates of seabird foraging ranges have been widely used to assess the potential of birds from specific colonies to interact with planned OWFs, and to apportion any predicted impacts to breeding populations. Ideally, these foraging range data would be site-specific estimates, collected from the colonies of interest using tracking devices within a timeframe of relevance to the planning process. However, logistical constraints linked to site accessibility, the availability of tags and suitably trained personnel to deploy them and the need to avoid deleterious tag effects mean that this is not always possible. Consequently, many assessments rely on previously published estimates of seabird foraging ranges. The rapid development of tracking technology means that there has been a substantial increase in both the number of individual birds and the number of seabird breeding colonies from which tracking data originate, increasing uncertainty as to whether assessments are based on the best available evidence. To address this, we carried out a systematic literature review of tracking studies for 27 species. By accounting for recently published data, we are able to generate more robust estimates of foraging ranges for many of these species. In some cases, these were more than double previous estimates. We investigate the potential for birds to interact with 41 new wind farms planned for UK waters. Whilst the collection of site-specific data to inform assessments for future OWFs is desirable, generic values, such as those presented here, are likely to play an important role for the foreseeable future. We discuss the limitations and issues to consider when using generic foraging ranges, and highlight the importance of having access to consolidated up-to-date information within the decision-making process.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mapping Seabird Sensitivity to Offshore Wind Farms
    Bradbury, Gareth
    Trinder, Mark
    Furness, Bob
    Banks, Alex N.
    Caldow, Richard W. G.
    Hume, Duncan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [2] Assessing seabird displacement at offshore wind farms: power ranges of a monitoring and data handling protocol
    Nicolas Vanermen
    Thierry Onkelinx
    Pieter Verschelde
    Wouter Courtens
    Marc Van de walle
    Hilbran Verstraete
    Eric W. M. Stienen
    [J]. Hydrobiologia, 2015, 756 : 155 - 167
  • [3] Assessing seabird displacement at offshore wind farms: power ranges of a monitoring and data handling protocol
    Vanermen, Nicolas
    Onkelinx, Thierry
    Verschelde, Pieter
    Courtens, Wouter
    Van de walle, Marc
    Verstraete, Hilbran
    Stienen, Eric W. M.
    [J]. HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2015, 756 (01) : 155 - 167
  • [4] Mapping seabird vulnerability to offshore wind farms in Norwegian waters
    Fauchald, Per
    Ollus, Victoria Marja Sofia
    Ballesteros, Manuel
    Breistol, Arild
    Christensen-Dalsgaard, Signe
    Molvaersmyr, Sindre
    Tarroux, Arnaud
    Systad, Geir Helge
    Moe, Borge
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2024, 11
  • [5] A tool to simulate decommissioning offshore wind farms
    McAuliffe, F. Devoy
    Desmond, C.
    Chester, R.
    Flannery, B.
    Judge, F.
    Lynch, K.
    Murphy, J.
    [J]. 16TH DEEP SEA OFFSHORE WIND R&D CONFERENCE, 2019, 1356
  • [6] Seabird foraging ranges as a preliminary tool for identifying candidate Marine Protected Areas
    Thaxter, Chris B.
    Lascelles, Ben
    Sugar, Kate
    Cook, Aonghais S. C. P.
    Roos, Staffan
    Bolton, Mark
    Langston, Rowena H. W.
    Burton, Niall H. K.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2012, 156 : 53 - 61
  • [7] The Habitat-creation Potential of Offshore Wind Farms
    Wilson, Jennifer C.
    Elliott, Michael
    [J]. WIND ENERGY, 2009, 12 (02) : 203 - 212
  • [8] The impact of tropical cyclones on potential offshore wind farms
    Mattu, Kanzis L.
    Bloomfield, Hannah C.
    Thomas, Simon
    Martinez-Alvarado, Oscar
    Rodriguez-Hernandez, Osvaldo
    [J]. ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 68 : 29 - 39
  • [9] NOWIcob - A tool for reducing the maintenance costs of offshore wind farms
    Hofmann, Matthias
    Sperstad, Iver Bakken
    [J]. DEEPWIND'2013 - SELECTED PAPERS FROM 10TH DEEP SEA OFFSHORE WIND R&D CONFERENCE, 2013, 35 : 177 - 186
  • [10] Seabird aggregative patterns: A new tool for offshore wind energy risk assessment
    Christel, Isadora
    Certain, Gregoire
    Cama, Albert
    Vieites, David R.
    Ferrer, Xavier
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2013, 66 (1-2) : 84 - 91