Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on tachycardia: a YouTube video-based study

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Zexi [1 ]
Yan, Chunyi [2 ]
Lyu, Xiaojun [1 ]
Li, Fanghui [1 ]
Zeng, Rui [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Second Univ Hosp, Dept Pediat Cardiol, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
YouTube; Tachycardia; Online videos; Patient education; HEALTH INFORMATION; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-024-20062-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Considering the adverse clinical consequences of pathologic tachycardia and the potential anxiety caused by physiological tachycardia in some heathy individuals, it is imperative to disseminate health information related to tachycardia for promotion in early diagnosis and appropriate management. YouTube has been increasingly used to access health care information. The aim of this study is to assess the quality and reliability of English YouTube videos focusing on tachycardia and further delve into strategies to enhance the quality of online health resources. Methods We conducted a search using the specific key words "tachycardia" in YouTube online library on December 2, 2023. The first 150 videos, ranked by "relevance", were initially recorded. After exclusions, a total of 113 videos were included. All videos were extracted for characteristics and categorized based on different topics, sources or contents. Two independent raters assessed the videos using Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, Modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) tool, Global Quality Scale (GQS) and Tachycardia-Specific Scale (TSS), followed by statistical analyses. All continuous data in the study were presented as median (interquartile range). Results The videos had a median JAMA score of 2.00 (1.00), mDISCERN of 3.00 (1.00), GQS of 2.00 (1.00), and TSS of 6.00 (4.50). There were significant differences in JAMA (P < 0.001), mDISCERN (P = 0.004), GQS (P = 0.001) and TSS (P < 0.001) scores among different sources. mDISCERN (P = 0.002), GQS (P < 0.001) and TSS (P = 0.030) scores significantly differed among various contents. No significant differences were observed in any of the scores among video topics. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that VPI exhibited significant correlations with quality and reliability. Multiple linear regression analysis suggested that longer video duration, sources of academics and healthcare professionals were independent predictors of higher reliability and quality, while content of ECG-specific information was an independent predictor of lower quality. Conclusions The reliability and educational quality of current tachycardia-related videos on YouTube are low. Longer video duration, sources of academics and healthcare professionals were closely associated with higher video reliability and quality. Improving the quality of internet medical information and optimizing online patient education necessitates collaborative efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality and reliability evaluation of online videos on carpal tunnel syndrome: a YouTube video-based study
    Kwak, Donghee
    Park, Jong Woong
    Won, Yousun
    Kwon, Yeongkeun
    Lee, Jung Il
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [2] Assessing the scientific quality and reliability of YouTube videos about chemotherapy
    Sahin, Elif
    Seyyar, Mustafa
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (45)
  • [3] Evaluating the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on myopia: a video content analysis
    Kayabasi, Mustafa
    Koksaldi, Seher
    Engin, Ceren Durmaz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [4] Assessing the Quality and Reliability of Rheumatoid Arthritis Exercise Videos on TikTok and YouTube
    Celik, Tugba Ozudogru
    Koca, Nadide
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 30 (01): : 12 - 20
  • [5] Assessment of Video Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos Regarding Meniscus Tear Rehabilitation
    Abed, Varag
    Ray, Matthew
    Smathers, Joseph
    Stone, Austin, V
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [6] Assessing the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as a source of information on inflammatory back pain
    Kara, Mete
    Ozduran, Erkan
    Kara, Muge Mercan
    Hanci, Volkan
    Erkin, Yueksel
    [J]. PEERJ, 2024, 12
  • [7] Quality and Reliability of Trigger Finger YouTube Videos
    Uzel, Kadir
    Yilmaz, Mehmet Kursat
    Cacan, Mehmet Akif
    Artuc, Merdan
    [J]. MLTJ-MUSCLES LIGAMENTS AND TENDONS JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (03): : 463 - 468
  • [8] Evaluation of quality and reliability of YouTube videos on spondylolisthesis
    Yaradilmis, Yuksel Ugur
    Evren, Ali Teoman
    Okkaoglu, Mustafa Caner
    Ozturk, Ozkan
    Haberal, Bahtiyar
    Ozdemir, Mahmut
    [J]. INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 22
  • [9] Assessing the educational quality of 'YouTube' videos for facelifts
    Deralchshan, Adeeb
    Lee, Linda
    Bhama, Prabhat
    Barbarite, Eric
    Shaye, David
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 40 (02) : 156 - 159
  • [10] Assessing the Quality of YouTube Videos on Adhesive Capsulitis
    Tang, Kevin
    Azhar, Umair
    Babar, Mustufa
    Ahmed, Atif
    Oh, Aaron
    Day, Wesley
    Harb, Hussein
    Chan, Ferdinand, I
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (07)