Future of clean energy for cooking in India: A comprehensive analysis of fuel alternatives

被引:1
|
作者
Mishra, Nishchaya Kumar [1 ]
Biswas, Pratim [2 ]
Patel, Sameer [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Gandhinagar, Dept Civil Engn, Palaj 382355, Gujarat, India
[2] Univ Miami, Dept Chem Environm & Mat Engn, Miami, FL 33146 USA
[3] Indian Inst Technol Gandhinagar, Dept Chem Engn, Palaj 382355, Gujarat, India
[4] Indian Inst Technol Gandhinagar, Kiran C Patel Ctr Sustainable Dev, Gandhinagar 382355, Gujarat, India
关键词
Clean fuel alternatives; Supply; -demand; Cost assessment; Health and exposure; Environmental impacts; Sustainable development goals; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; HOUSEHOLD AIR-POLLUTION; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; NITROGEN-DIOXIDE; BIOGAS DISSEMINATION; PARTICULATE MATTER; SOLID FUELS; EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY; KEROSENE;
D O I
10.1016/j.esd.2024.101500
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Household air pollution, primarily from solid fuels, globally caused 3.2 million premature deaths in 2020. India houses more than a quarter of global solid fuel users, and transitioning them to cleaner fuels offers an opportunity for global environmental and socio-economic impacts and addressing multiple sustainable development goals. This study compares cooking fuels from the perspective of health, environmental impacts, cost, supplydemand dynamics, and relevant policies. Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and piped natural gas (PNG) are being aggressively promoted as cleaner fuel alternatives. However, their sustained use, high reliance on imports, volatile prices, and environmental impacts remain a concern. Moreover, LPG and PNG might not be clean enough as NOx and ultrafine particle emissions have been associated with adverse health impacts. Replacing current solid fuels with LPG will annually add about 91 million metric tons of CO2 (just from combustion), translating to an increase of about 3.5 % of the country's CO2 emissions. Direct and indirect imports constituted 96.5 % of the total LPG consumption in 2021-22, and the same has remained above 90 % for the last decade. Furthermore, the current subsidy-based policy promoting LPG adoption doubled the active user base in just seven years. However, annual LPG consumption has steadily declined from -110 kg to -85 kg per user over the same period, indicating non-sustained adoption. Unlike developed countries, electricity for cooking has not gained popularity in India, even though it has the potential to address the shortcomings of LPG and PNG. Decentralization and integration of renewables in the power generation sector can provide energy with lower carbon intensity, lesser reliance on imports, and relatively stable prices. The cooking energy portfolio of India will be a mixed bag, but more comprehensive forward-looking policies are needed to optimize its composition.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dissemination of cooking energy alternatives in India - a review
    Pohekar, SD
    Kumar, D
    Ramachandran, M
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2005, 9 (04): : 379 - 393
  • [2] Fuel for food: Access to clean cooking fuel and food security in India
    Fadly, Dalia
    Fontes, Francisco
    Maertens, Miet
    [J]. FOOD SECURITY, 2023, 15 (02) : 301 - 321
  • [3] Fuel for food: Access to clean cooking fuel and food security in India
    Dalia Fadly
    Francisco Fontes
    Miet Maertens
    [J]. Food Security, 2023, 15 : 301 - 321
  • [4] The refill gap: clean cooking fuel adoption in rural India
    Cabiyo, Bodie
    Ray, Isha
    Levine, David, I
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [5] Comprehensive Analysis of Clean Energy Generation Mechanisms in Microbial Fuel Cells
    Kwofie, Matthew
    Amanful, Bright
    Gamor, Samuel
    Kaku, Foster
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2024, 2024
  • [6] LPG as a clean cooking fuel: Adoption, use, and impact in rural India
    Gould, Carlos F.
    Urpelainen, Johannes
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 122 : 395 - 408
  • [7] Is MSW derived DME a viable clean cooking fuel in Kolkata, India?
    Grove, Johannes
    Lant, Paul A.
    Greig, Chris R.
    Smart, Simon
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 124 : 50 - 60
  • [8] A MULTIOBJECTIVE ANALYSIS OF COOKING-ENERGY ALTERNATIVES
    RAMANATHAN, R
    GANESH, LS
    [J]. ENERGY, 1994, 19 (04) : 469 - 478
  • [9] COOKING ALTERNATIVES FOR SAVING ENERGY
    BREMER, M
    FARNER, B
    ANDERSON, J
    [J]. ILLINOIS RESEARCH, 1978, 20 (03): : 18 - 18
  • [10] Universal access to clean cooking energy and the need for an inclusive policy: Evidence from analysis of cooking fuel use in Odisha and Tamil Nadu
    Manjula M.
    Gopi G.
    [J]. DECISION, 2017, 44 (3) : 193 - 207