Avoidance and attraction responses of kittiwakes to three offshore wind farms in the North Sea

被引:0
|
作者
Pollock, Christopher J. [1 ,2 ]
Johnston, Daniel T. [1 ]
Boersch-Supan, Philipp H. [3 ]
Thaxter, Chris B. [3 ]
Humphreys, Elizabeth M. [1 ]
O'Hanlon, Nina J. [1 ]
Clewley, Gary D. [1 ]
Weston, Ewan D. [4 ]
Shamoun-Baranes, Judy [5 ]
Cook, Aonghais S. C. P. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Stirling Univ, Beta Ctr, Unit 15, British Trust Ornithol Scotland, Innovat Pk, Stirling FK9 4NF, Scotland
[2] UK Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Bush Estate, Penicuik EH26 0QB, Scotland
[3] British Trust Ornithol, Thetford IP24 2PU, England
[4] Comers Wood Croft, Midmar AB51 7QB, Scotland
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Biodivers & Ecosyst Dynam, NL-1090 GE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Biodivers Consultancy, 3E Kings Parade, Cambridge CB2 1SJ, England
关键词
Kittiwake; Rissa tridactyla; Avoidance; Attraction; Collision-risk modelling; Offshore wind farm; AVIAN COLLISION RISK; BLACK-BACKED GULLS; IMPACTS; SEABIRDS; VULNERABILITY; BARRIERS; TRACKING;
D O I
10.1007/s00227-024-04542-y
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Seabird collision risk is a key concern in relation to the environmental impacts associated with offshore wind farms (OWFs). Understanding how species respond both to the wind farm itself, and individual turbines within the wind farm, is key to enabling better quantification and management of collision risk. Collision risk is of particular concern for the black-legged kittiwake, Rissa tridactyla, where modelling predicts unsustainable population level impacts. In this study 20 adult breeding kittiwakes, were tracked with GPS from Whinnyfold, Scotland (57 degrees 23 ' 07 '' N, 001 degrees 52 ' 11 '' W) during the breeding season in 2021. An Avoidance-Attraction Index (AAI) was estimated at several bands within macro- and meso-scales (0-4 km from outer boundary and 0-400 m from turbines, respectively), and the Avoidance Rate (AR; used in environmental impact assessments) at macro-scale to estimate avoidance behaviour to three operational OWFs within their foraging range. One offshore wind farm and its buffer zone (0-4 km from outer boundary) was visited more frequently by the majority of tracked individuals (19/20 birds), despite being twice as far as the closest OWF (17.3 and 31.9 km respectively), whilst 10 or less individuals used the remaining two OWFs. At the most frequented OWF we found macro-scale attraction to the closest band (0-1 km) trending towards avoidance in the furthest band (3-4 km). At the meso-scale we found avoidance of areas below the rotor height range (RHR, a.k.a. rotor swept area/zone) up to 120 m from individual turbines, which decreased to 60 m when within the RHR. Our results indicate that kittiwakes may be slightly attracted to the area around OWFs or aggregate here due to displacement but avoid individual turbines. Increased productivity in the OWF area may potentially be drawing birds into the general area, with aversion to individual turbines being responsible for meso-scale observations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seabird avoidance and attraction at an offshore wind farm in the Belgian part of the North Sea
    Vanermen, Nicolas
    Onkelinx, Thierry
    Courtens, Wouter
    Van de walle, Marc
    Verstraete, Hilbran
    Stienen, Eric W. M.
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2015, 756 (01) : 51 - 61
  • [2] Seabird avoidance and attraction at an offshore wind farm in the Belgian part of the North Sea
    Nicolas Vanermen
    Thierry Onkelinx
    Wouter Courtens
    Marc Van de walle
    Hilbran Verstraete
    Eric W. M. Stienen
    Hydrobiologia, 2015, 756 : 51 - 61
  • [3] Seabirds and offshore wind farms in European waters: Avoidance and attraction
    Dierschke, Volker
    Furness, Robert W.
    Garthe, Stefan
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2016, 202 : 59 - 68
  • [4] Investigating avoidance and attraction responses in lesser black-backed gulls Larus fuscus to offshore wind farms
    Johnston, Daniel T.
    Thaxter, Chris B.
    Boersch-Supan, Philipp H.
    Humphreys, Elizabeth M.
    Bouten, Willem
    Clewley, Gary D.
    Scragg, Emily S.
    Masden, Elizabeth A.
    Barber, Lee
    Conway, Greg J.
    Clark, Nigel A.
    Burton, Niall H. K.
    Cook, Aonghais S. C. P.
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2022, 686 : 187 - 200
  • [5] Potential Impacts of Offshore Wind Farms on North Sea Stratification
    Carpenter, Jeffrey R.
    Merckelbach, Lucas
    Callies, Ulrich
    Clark, Suzanna
    Gaslikova, Lidia
    Baschek, Burkard
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (08):
  • [6] Windstorm risk assessment for offshore wind farms in the North Sea
    Buchana, Paul
    McSharry, Patrick E.
    WIND ENERGY, 2019, 22 (09) : 1219 - 1229
  • [7] Offshore wind farms contribute to epibenthic biodiversity in the North Sea
    ter Hofstede, R.
    Driessen, F. M. F.
    Elzinga, P. J.
    Van Koningsveld, M.
    Schutter, M.
    JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH, 2022, 185
  • [8] Accessibility assessment for operation and maintenance of offshore wind farms in the North Sea
    Martini, Michele
    Guanche, Raul
    Losada, Inigo J.
    Vidal, Cesar
    WIND ENERGY, 2017, 20 (04) : 637 - 656
  • [9] Business case for mussel aquaculture in offshore wind farms in the North Sea
    van den Burg, S. W. K.
    Kamermans, P.
    Blanch, M.
    Pletsas, D.
    Poelman, M.
    Soma, K.
    Dalton, G.
    MARINE POLICY, 2017, 85 : 1 - 7
  • [10] Offshore-Wind Farms in the german Baltic Sea
    Kaiser, Fritz
    Prange, Oliver
    Du, 2015, (855): : 68 - 75