Active surveillance of low-grade prostate cancer using the SurACaP Criteria: A multi-institutional series with a median follow-up of 10 years

被引:0
|
作者
Leclercq, L. [1 ]
Bastide, C. [1 ]
Lechevallier, E. [2 ]
Walz, J. [3 ]
Charvet, A. -L. [1 ]
Gondran-Tellier, B. [2 ]
Campagna, J. [1 ]
Savoie, P. -Henri [4 ]
Long-Depaquit, T. [4 ]
Daniel, L. [5 ]
Rossi, D. [1 ]
Pignot, G. [3 ]
Baboudjian, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, North Hosp, AP HM, Dept Urol, Marseille, France
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, La Conception Hosp, AP HM, Dept Urol, Marseille, France
[3] Inst Paoli Calmette, Dept Onco Urol, Marseille, France
[4] Hop Instruct Armees St Anne, Dept Urol, Toulon, France
[5] Aix Marseille Univ, Dept Pathol, Timone Hosp, AP HM, Marseille, France
来源
FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2024年 / 34卷 / 02期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Low grade; Active surveillance; Oncological outcomes; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102571
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To report on the oncological outcomes of active surveillance (AS) in low-grade prostate cancer (PCa) patients using the French SurACaP protocol, with a focus on long-term outcomes. Methods: This multicenter study recruited patients with low-grade PCa between 2007 and 2013 in four referral centers in France. The cohort included patients meeting the SurACaP inclusion criteria, i.e., aged < 75 years, with low-grade PCa (i.e., ISUP 1), clinical stage T1c/T2a, PSA < 10 ng/mL and < 3 positive cores and tumor length < 3 mm per core. The SurACaP protocol included a digital rectal examination every six months, PSA level measurement every three months for the first two years after inclusion and twice a year thereafter, a confirmatory biopsy in the first year after inclusion, and then follow-up biopsy every two years or if disease progression was suspected. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) was progressively included over the study period. Results: A total of 86 consecutive patients were included, with a median follow-up of 10.6 years. Only one patient developed metastases and died of PCa. The estimated rates of grade reclassification and treatment -free survival at 15 years were 53.4% and 21.2%, respectively. A negative mpMRI at baseline and a negative confirmatory biopsy were significantly associated with a lower risk of disease progression ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: AS using the French SurACaP protocol is a safe and valuable strategy for patients with low -risk PCa, with excellent oncological outcomes after more than 10 years ' follow-up. Future studies are crucial to broaden the inclusion criteria and develop a personalized, risk based AS protocol with the aim of de-escalating follow-up examinations. Level of evidence: Grade 4. (c) 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Multi-institutional Evaluation of Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Mueller, Alex
    Berglund, Ryan K.
    Ayyathurai, Raj
    Soloway, Cindy
    Soloway, Mark S.
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Klein, Eric A.
    Jones, Steven J.
    Zappavigna, Chris
    Goldenberg, Larry
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 1635 - 1641
  • [2] A Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Mueller, Alex
    Berglund, Ryan K.
    Ayyathurai, Raj
    Soloway, Cindy
    Soloway, Mark S.
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Klein, Eric A.
    Jones, Steven J.
    Zappavigna, Chris
    Goldenberg, Larry
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (01): : S19 - S25
  • [3] Deferred treatment of clinically localized low-grade prostate cancer: Actual 10 years and projected 15 years follow-up of the Karolinska series.
    Adolfsson, J
    Steineck, G
    Hedlund, PO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (05): : 252 - 252
  • [4] Re: A Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
    Ayres, B. E.
    Bott, S. R. J.
    Barber, N. J.
    Langley, S. E. M.
    Montgomery, B. S. I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (03): : 1223 - 1224
  • [5] A Multi-institutional Evaluation of Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer COMMENT
    Dall'Era, Marc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 1641 - 1641
  • [6] A Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Dall'Era, Marc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (01): : S25 - S25
  • [7] Re: A Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer Reply
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (03): : 1224 - 1224
  • [8] A multi-institutional cohort of active surveillance for low-risk localized prostate cancer
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Mueller, Alexander
    Berglund, Ryan K.
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Zappavigna, Chris
    Soloway, Cindy T.
    Soloway, Mark S.
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Klein, Eric A.
    Goldenberg, Larry
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    Guillonneau, Bertrand D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 64 - 64
  • [9] A multi-institutional cohort of active surveillance for low-risk localized prostate cancer
    Eggener, S.
    Berglund, R.
    Mueller, A.
    Ayyathurrai, R.
    Soloway, M.
    Abouassaly, R.
    Jones, S.
    Klein, E.
    Zippavigna, C.
    Goldenberg, L.
    Eastham, J.
    Scardino, P.
    Guillonneau, B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 235 - 235
  • [10] Limiting the toxicity by using SBRT for prostate cancer patients: 3 year follow-up in a multi-institutional study
    Aluwini, S.
    Beltramo, G.
    Van Rooij, P.
    Boormans, J.
    Kirkels, W.
    Kolkman-Deurloo, I. K.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S45 - S46