Do natural resources impact economic growth: An investigation of P5+1 countries under sustainable management

被引:34
|
作者
Singh, Sanjeet [1 ]
Sharma, Gagan Deep [2 ]
Radulescu, Magdalena [3 ,4 ]
Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel [5 ,6 ]
Bansal, Pooja [1 ]
机构
[1] Chandigarh Univ, Univ Ctr Res & Dev, Gharuan 140413, Punjab, India
[2] Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha Univ, Univ Sch Management Studies, Delhi, India
[3] Univ Pitesti, Dept Finance Accounting & Econ, Pitesti 110040, Romania
[4] Lucian Blaga Univ Sibiu, Dept Surg, Sibiu 550024, Romania
[5] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Dept Appl Economics1, Cuenca 16002, Spain
[6] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Fac Econ & Management, Dept Management, Prague 16500, Czech Republic
关键词
Natural resources rent; Economic growth; Quantile-on-quantile regression; Cross-sectional ARDL; P5+1 countries; INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY; STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATION; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; CARBON EMISSIONS; TRADE OPENNESS; CURSE; ABUNDANCE; PANEL; DEPENDENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101595
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Natural resources represent the base of our living and the entire economic activity. Their depletion is a major challenge for the economic development of both developed and developing economies. Their efficient use is an indispensable requirement and must be the aim of the public policies designed by the authorities worldwide. In this research, we have investigated the impact of the natural resources rent on the economic growth in some major wealthy economies of the world (P5 + 1 countries namely: US, UK, France, China, Russia, and Germany). We have applied a quantile-on-quantile regression to analyse this impact on different quantiles and a cross-sectional autoregressive distributed lag (CS-ARDL) approach for the panel of these six countries. The Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality test was also used to check the causality between natural resource rents and economic growth in these countries. Results show a negative relationship between natural resources rent and economic growth for the panel but a different impact on quantiles in each country. Only for China and the US, a positive effect can be noticed for both lower and higher quantiles of natural resources and economic growth. The Dumitrescu-Hurlin causality test shows that natural resources can predict economic growth only in China, the U.S., and the panel. In contrast, no causality was found for the other four countries included in the panel. We suggest that nations invest in wind and solar projects, use biofuels and nuclear energy, introduce a temporary profit tax to protect consumers from escalating energy prices, and increase energy efficiency in buildings and industry. Businesses would benefit from a regulatory framework that is uniform and exhaustive, as well as easier to traverse and more receptive to innovation and creativity. Public-private partnership investments in innovation, innovation incentives, and environmental sector opportunities may foster long-term economic growth. (c) 2023 China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Geosciences (Beijing). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Further investigation of natural resources and economic growth: Do natural resources depress economic growth?
    Gerelmaa, Lkhagva
    Kotani, Koji
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2016, 50 : 312 - 321
  • [2] Do economic growth and globalization are drivers of sustainable resources management? New insights from BRICS countries
    Wang, Junqi
    ul Abidin, Rana Zain
    Afshan, Sahar
    Miao, Chenglin
    Ullah, Ehsan
    Cai, Xuesen
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 87
  • [3] Fostering green economic growth through sustainable management of natural resources
    Li, Zerong
    Li, Lan
    Hui, Mo
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2024, 91
  • [4] Impact of energy intensity, green economy, and natural resources development to achieve sustainable economic growth in Asian countries
    Huang, Weiting
    He, Jia
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 84
  • [5] Impact of economic growth, natural resources and trade on ecological footprint: do education and longevity promote sustainable development in Algeria?
    Boukhelkhal, Abdelaziz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2022, 29 (08): : 875 - 887
  • [6] Natural Resources Exports, Diversification and Economic Growth of CEMAC Countries: On the Impact of Trade with China
    Diaw, Diadie
    Lessoua, Albert
    [J]. AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-REVUE AFRICAINE DE DEVELOPPEMENT, 2013, 25 (02): : 189 - 202
  • [8] Unleashing the dynamic linkages among natural resources, economic complexity, and sustainable economic growth: Evidence from G-20 countries
    Zhang, Can
    Waris, Umra
    Qian, Leren
    Irfan, Muhammad
    Rehman, Mubeen Abdur
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 32 (04) : 3736 - 3752
  • [9] Dynamic linkages between human capital, natural resources, and economic growth - Impact on achieving sustainable development goals
    Jie, Yu
    Lan, Jing
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (14)
  • [10] Natural resources management and technological innovation under EKC framework: A glimmer of hope for sustainable environment in newly industrialized countries
    Chen, Jie
    Huang, Shoujun
    Ajaz, Tahseen
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 79