Multivariate signal-to-noise ratio as a metric for characterizing spectral computed tomography

被引:0
|
作者
Rajagopal, Jayasai R. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Farhadi, Faraz [4 ,5 ]
Saboury, Babak [4 ]
Sahbaee, Pooyan [6 ]
Negussie, Ayele H. [4 ]
Pritchard, William F. [4 ]
Jones, Elizabeth C. [4 ]
Samei, Ehsan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Carl E Ravin Adv Imaging Labs, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Ctr Virtual Imaging Trials, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Phys Grad Program, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[4] NIH, Radiol & Imaging Sci, Clin Ctr, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] Dartmouth Coll, Geisel Sch Med, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[6] Siemens Med Solut, Malvern, PA USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2024年 / 69卷 / 14期
关键词
spectral CT; image quality; metrology; DUAL-ENERGY CT; IMAGE-QUALITY; DETECTOR; SUPPRESSION;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ad5d4a
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. With the introduction of spectral CT techniques into the clinic, the imaging capacities of CT were expanded to multiple energy levels. Due to a variety of factors, the acquired signal in spectral CT datasets is shared between these images. Conventional image quality metrics assume independence between images which is not preserved within spectral CT datasets, limiting their utility for characterizing energy selective images. The purpose of this work was to develop a metrology to characterize energy selective images by incorporating the shared information between images within a spectral CT dataset. Approach. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was extended into a multivariate space where each image within a spectral CT dataset was treated as a separate information channel. The general definition was applied to the specific case of contrast to define a multivariate contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The matrix contained two types of terms: a conventional CNR term which characterized image quality within each image in the spectral CT dataset and covariance weighted CNR (Covar-CNR) which characterized the contrast in each image relative to the covariance between images. Experimental data from an investigational photon-counting CT scanner was used to demonstrate the insight of this metrology. A cylindrical water phantom containing vials of iodine and gadolinium (2, 4, and 8 mg ml-1) was imaged under conditions of variable tube current, tube voltage, and energy threshold. Two image series (threshold and bin images) containing two images each were defined based upon the contribution of photons to reconstructed images. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was calculated between CNR terms and image acquisition variables. A multivariate regression was then fitted to experimental data. Main Results. Image type had a major difference on how Covar-CNR values were distributed. Bin images had a slightly higher mean and wider standard deviation (Covar-CNRlo: 3.38 +/- 17.25, Covar-CNRhi: 5.77 +/- 30.64) compared to threshold images (Covar-CNRlo: 2.08 +/- 1.89, Covar-CNRhi: 3.45 +/- 2.49) across all conditions. ANOVA found that each acquisition variable had a significant relationship with both Covar-CNR terms. The multivariate regression model suggested that material concentration had the largest impact on all CNR terms. Signficance. In this work, we described a theoretical framework to extend the SNR to a multivariate form that is able to characterize images independently and also provide insight regarding the relationship between images. Experimental data was used to demonstrate the insight that this metrology provides about image formation factors in spectral CT.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Signal-to-noise ratio analysis of the computed tomography imaging spectrometer
    Volin, CE
    Descour, MR
    Dereniak, EL
    [J]. IMAGING SPECTROMETRY IV, 1998, 3438 : 107 - 113
  • [2] Analysis of in-plane signal-to-noise ratio in computed tomography
    Hara, Takanori
    Ichikawa, Katsuhiro
    Sanada, Shigeru
    Ida, Yoshihiro
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3, 2008, 6913
  • [3] Optical coherence tomography by "spectral radar":: Improvement of signal-to-noise ratio
    Andretzky, P
    Knauer, M
    Kiesewetter, F
    Häusler, G
    [J]. COHERENCE DOMAIN OPTICAL METHODS IN BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE AND CLINICAL APPLICATIONS IV, 2000, 3915 : 55 - 59
  • [4] Characterizing quasars in the mid-infrared: high signal-to-noise ratio spectral templates
    Hill, Allison R.
    Gallagher, S. C.
    Deo, R. P.
    Peeters, E.
    Richards, Gordon T.
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 438 (03) : 2317 - 2327
  • [5] Signal-to-Noise Ratio: A Robust Distance Metric for Deep Metric Learning
    Yuan, Tongtong
    Deng, Weihong
    Tang, Jian
    Tang, Yinan
    Chen, Binghui
    [J]. 2019 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR 2019), 2019, : 4810 - 4819
  • [6] 'Signal-to-Noise Ratio'
    McCooey, D
    [J]. POETRY REVIEW, 1999, 89 (01): : 73 - 73
  • [7] Noise Variance and Signal-to-Noise Ratio Estimation from Spectral Data
    Schuster, Stefan
    Exel, Dominik
    Scheiblhofer, Stefan
    Zankl, Dominik
    Ganglberger, Vera
    Reisinger, Johann
    Zagar, Bernhard
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (I2MTC), 2019, : 1416 - 1421
  • [8] THE EFFECT OF SCATTER REDUCTION ON THE SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO IN COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY
    MIETTUNEN, RH
    KORHOLA, OA
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1991, 12 (03) : 167 - 170
  • [9] Signal-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise efficiency in SMASH imaging
    Sodickson, DK
    Griswold, MA
    Jakob, PM
    Edelman, RR
    Manning, WJ
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1999, 41 (05) : 1009 - 1022
  • [10] Image Fusion in Dual Energy Computed Tomography Effect on Contrast Enhancement, Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Image Quality in Computed Tomography Angiography
    Behrendt, Florian F.
    Schmidt, Bernhard
    Plumhans, Cedric
    Keil, Sebastian
    Woodruff, Seth G.
    Ackermann, Diana
    Muehlenbruch, Georg
    Flohr, Thomas
    Guenther, Rolf W.
    Mahnken, Andreas H.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2009, 44 (01) : 1 - 6