Associations between first-trimester screening biomarkers and maternal characteristics with gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese women

被引:0
|
作者
Lu, Yu-Ting [1 ]
Chen, Chie-Pein [1 ]
Sun, Fang-Ju [2 ]
Chen, Yi-Yung [1 ]
Wang, Liang-Kai [1 ]
Chen, Chen-Yu [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] MacKay Mem Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] MacKay Mem Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] MacKay Med Coll, Dept Med, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
关键词
gestational diabetes mellitus; first-trimester biomarkers; maternal characteristics; pregnancy-associated plasma protein A; placental growth factor; PLASMA PROTEIN-A; HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN; PLACENTAL GROWTH-FACTOR; 1ST TRIMESTER; BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS; BLOOD-PRESSURE; BETA-CELLS; HIGH-RISK; PAPP-A; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2024.1383706
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can result in adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Predicting those at high risk of GDM and early interventions can reduce the development of GDM. The aim of this study was to examine the associations between first-trimester prenatal screening biomarkers and maternal characteristics in relation to GDM in Chinese women. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnant women who received first-trimester aneuploidy and preeclampsia screening between January 2019 and May 2021. First-trimester prenatal screening biomarkers, including pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, and placental growth factor (PLGF), along with maternal characteristics, were collected for analysis in relation to GDM. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate variables associated with GDM. Results Of the 1452 pregnant women enrolled, 96 developed GDM. PAPP-A (5.01 vs. 5.73 IU/L, P < 0.001) and PLGF (39.88 vs. 41.81 pg/mL, P = 0.044) were significantly lower in the GDM group than in the non-GDM group. The area under the ROC curve of combined maternal characteristics and biomarkers was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.79, P < 0.001). The formula for predicting GDM was as follows: P = 1/[1 + exp (-8.148 + 0.057 x age + 0.011 x pregestational body mass index + 1.752 x previous GDM history + 0.95 x previous preeclampsia history + 0.756 x family history of diabetes + 0.025 x chronic hypertension + 0.036 x mean arterial pressure - 0.09 x PAPP-A - 0.001 x PLGF)]. Logistic regression analysis revealed that higher pregestational body mass index (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.06, P = 0.012), previous GDM history (aOR 9.97, 95% CI 3.92 - 25.37, P < 0.001), family history of diabetes (aOR 2.36, 95% CI 1.39 - 4.02, P = 0.001), higher mean arterial pressure (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07 - 1.27, P < 0.001), and lower PAPP-A level (aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 - 1.00, P = 0.040) were independently associated with the development of GDM. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test demonstrated that the model exhibited an excellent discrimination ability (chi-square = 3.089, df = 8, P = 0.929). Conclusion Downregulation of first-trimester PAPP-A and PLGF was associated with the development of GDM. Combining first-trimester biomarkers with maternal characteristics could be valuable for predicting the risk of GDM.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] First-Trimester Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Based on Maternal Characteristics and History
    Syngelaki, Argyro
    Pastides, Alice
    Kotecha, Reena
    Wright, Alan
    Akolekar, Ranjit
    Nicolaides, Kypros H.
    [J]. FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2015, 38 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [2] First Trimester Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus with Maternal Factors and Biomarkers
    Shen, Lixia
    Sahota, Daljit S.
    Chaemsaithong, Piya
    Tse, Wing Ting
    Chung, Man Yan
    Ip, Jeffery Ka Him
    Leung, Tak Yeung
    Poon, Liona Chiu Yee
    [J]. FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2022, 49 (5-6) : 256 - 264
  • [3] First-Trimester Maternal Serum Biomarkers for Prediction of Gestational Diabetes
    Rasanen, Juha P.
    Nagalla, Srinivasa R.
    Snyder, Caryn A.
    Roberts, Charles T.
    Paturi, Vishnu
    [J]. DIABETES, 2012, 61 : A213 - A213
  • [4] First-Trimester Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Twin Pregnancies
    Buerger, Olga
    Elger, Tania
    Varthaliti, Antonia
    Syngelaki, Argyro
    Wright, Alan
    Nicolaides, Kypros H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (17)
  • [5] First-trimester biochemical markers of placentation in screening for gestational diabetes mellitus
    Syngelaki, Argyro
    Kotecha, Reena
    Pastides, Alice
    Wright, Alan
    Nicolaides, Kypros H.
    [J]. METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2015, 64 (11): : 1485 - 1489
  • [6] Can first-trimester screening program detect women at high risk for gestational diabetes mellitus?
    Kulaksizoglu, Sevsen
    Kulaksizoglu, Mustafa
    Kebapcilar, Ayse Gul
    Torun, Ayse Nur
    Ozcimen, Emel
    Turkoglu, Suna
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2013, 29 (02) : 137 - 140
  • [7] First-Trimester Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Examining the Potential of Combining Maternal Characteristics and Laboratory Measures
    Savvidou, Makrina
    Nelson, Scott M.
    Makgoba, Mahlatse
    Messow, Claudia-Martina
    Sattar, Naveed
    Nicolaides, Kypros
    [J]. DIABETES, 2010, 59 (12) : 3017 - 3022
  • [8] Implementation of a first-trimester prognostic model to improve screening for gestational diabetes mellitus
    van Hoorn, Fieke
    Koster, Maria P. H.
    Kwee, Anneke
    Groenendaal, Floris
    Franx, Arie
    Bekker, Mireille N.
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [9] Implementation of a first-trimester prognostic model to improve screening for gestational diabetes mellitus
    Fieke van Hoorn
    Maria P. H. Koster
    Anneke Kwee
    Floris Groenendaal
    Arie Franx
    Mireille N. Bekker
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [10] First-trimester biomarkers for early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis
    Yan, Yu
    Pu, Caixiu
    Zhou, Wei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (03): : 5662 - 5669