Industrialization, environmental externality, and climate mitigation strategies

被引:0
|
作者
Ye, Huiying [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liao, Hua [2 ,3 ]
Zheng, Guoliang [2 ,3 ]
Peng, Ying [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Tianjin 300401, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Integrated assessment model; National abatement path; Industrialization process; Nash equilibrium; Carbon price; POLICY; GROWTH; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106826
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study proposes a 12-region global modeling framework that integrates industrialization into climate-economy interactions and applies it to explore national strategic interactions and long-term policy outcomes. In this regard, three policy regimes are considered: a non-cooperative Nash equilibrium and two cooperative regimes that maximize the weighted sum of regional welfare. Negishi weights, ensuring uniform carbon price, and equal weights are applied in cooperative setting. Based on the results, global unmitigated emissions will peak around 2040. Given the future industrialization process, developing countries will make greater mitigation efforts under all regimes, whereas the strategies of developed countries will only be affected under the uniform carbon price regime. In the two cooperative regimes, a clear separation of mitigation efforts is observed between developed and developing countries. Moreover, when accounting for industrialization, the global averaged carbon price should grow faster in the first half-century, followed by a period of slower growth. Sensitivity analysis implies that with the support from developed countries, accelerated industrialization in the developing world can help alleviate its environmental strain.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corporate governance and business strategies for climate change and environmental mitigation
    Aggarwal, Raj
    Dow, Sandra
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2012, 18 (3-4): : 311 - 331
  • [2] STRATEGIES FOR RADICAL CLIMATE MITIGATION
    Diesendorf, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIAN POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2010, (66): : 98 - 117
  • [3] Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review
    Samer Fawzy
    Ahmed I. Osman
    John Doran
    David W. Rooney
    [J]. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2020, 18 : 2069 - 2094
  • [4] Optimal Strategies for Climate Change Mitigation
    Arrighini, Michele Francesco
    Marchesi, Claudio
    Zecchi, Laura
    Volta, Marialuisa
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2024, 58 (02): : 80 - 85
  • [5] Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review
    Fawzy, Samer
    Osman, Ahmed I.
    Doran, John
    Rooney, David W.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2020, 18 (06) : 2069 - 2094
  • [6] An innovative environmental citizen behavior model: Recycling intention as climate change mitigation strategies
    Yu, Tai-Kuei
    Lin, Feng-Yi
    Kao, Kai-Yun
    Chao, Cheng-Min
    Yu, Tai-Yi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 247 : 499 - 508
  • [7] Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation
    Fischer, Carolyn
    Newell, Richard G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 55 (02) : 142 - 162
  • [8] CLIMATE CHANGE AND EXTERNALITY
    Yang, Zili
    [J]. CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2020, 11 (04)
  • [9] China's climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies for decreasing environmental impacts in the agricultural sector
    Kosari-Moghaddam, Armaghan
    Yang, Yadong
    Du, Yating
    Zhang, Yijia
    Du, Xinyi
    Liu, Zixuan
    Birkved, Morten
    Tabatabaei, Meisam
    Aghbashlo, Mortaza
    Khoshnevisan, Benyamin
    Pan, Junting
    [J]. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2025, 53 : 147 - 161
  • [10] Consequential and attributional environmental assessment of biofuels: implications of modelling choices on climate change mitigation strategies
    Trakarn Prapaspongsa
    Shabbir H. Gheewala
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 1644 - 1657