The prediction of pCR and chemosensitivity for breast cancer patients using DLG3, RADL and Pathomics signatures based on machine learning and deep learning

被引:2
|
作者
Jiang, Cong [1 ]
Zhang, XueFang [2 ]
Qu, Tong [3 ]
Yang, Xinxin [4 ]
Xiu, Yuting [1 ]
Yu, Xiao [1 ]
Zhang, Shiyuan [1 ]
Qiao, Kun [1 ]
Meng, Hongxue [4 ]
Li, Xuelian [1 ,5 ]
Huang, Yuanxi [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Med Univ, Dept Breast Surg, Canc Hosp, Harbin 150086, Peoples R China
[2] First Peoples Hosp Xiangtan City, Dept Pathol, Xiangtan 411100, Peoples R China
[3] Second Canc Hosp Heilongjiang Prov, Dept Oncol, Harbin 150086, Peoples R China
[4] Harbin Med Univ, Dept Pathol, Canc Hosp, Harbin 150086, Peoples R China
[5] Harbin Med Univ, State Key Lab Frigid Zone Cardiovasc Dis SKLFZCD, State Key Lab Prov Key Labs Biomed Pharmaceut Chin, Key Lab Cardiovasc Res,Minist Educ,Coll Pharm,Dept, Harbin 150081, Peoples R China
来源
TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 46卷
关键词
Breast cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Pathological complete response; Prognosis; Deep learning; Multiomics; DLG3; Chemosensitivity; RADIOMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranon.2024.101985
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Limited studies have investigated the predictive value of multiomics signatures (radiomics, deep learning features, pathological features and DLG3) in breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, no study has explored the relationships among radiomic, pathomic signatures and chemosensitivity. This study aimed to predict pathological complete response (pCR) using multiomics signatures, and to evaluate the predictive utility of radiomic and pathomic signatures for guiding chemotherapy selection. Methods: The oncogenic function of DLG3 was explored in breast cancer cells via DLG3 knockdown. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to evaluate the relationship between DLG3 expression and docetaxel/epirubin sensitivity. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms were used to develop multiomics signatures. Survival analysis was conducted by K-M curves and log-rank. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop nomograms. Results: A total of 311 patients with malignant breast tumours who underwent NAC were retrospectively included in this multicentre study. Multiomics (DLG3, RADL and PATHO) signatures could accurately predict pCR (AUC: training: 0.900; testing: 0.814; external validation: 0.792). Its performance is also superior to that of clinical TNM staging and the single RADL signature in different cohorts. Patients in the low DLG3 group more easily achieved pCR, and those in the high RADL Signature_pCR and PATHO_Signature_pCR (OR = 7.93, 95 % CI: 3.49-18, P < 0.001) groups more easily achieved pCR. In the TEC regimen NAC group, patients who achieved pCR had a lower DLG3 score (4.00 +/- 2.33 vs. 6.43 +/- 3.01, P < 0.05). Patients in the low RADL_Signature_DLG3 and PATHO_Signature_DLG3 groups had lower DLG3 IHC scores (P < 0.05). Patients in the high RADL signature, PATHO signature and DLG3 signature groups had worse DFS and OS. Conclusions: Multiomics signatures (RADL, PATHO and DLG3) demonstrated great potential in predicting the pCR of breast cancer patients who underwent NAC. The RADL and PATHO signatures are associated with DLG3 status and could help doctors or patients choose proper neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens (TEC regimens). This simple, structured, convenient and inexpensive multiomics model could help clinicians and patients make treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of Chemosensitivity in Multiple Primary Cancer Patients Using Machine Learning
    Zhang, Xianglan
    Jang, Mi
    Zheng, Zhenlong
    Gao, Aihua
    Lin, Zhenhua
    Kim, Ki-Yeol
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (05) : 2419 - 2429
  • [2] Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches in Breast Cancer Survival Prediction Using Clinical Data
    Kalafi, E. Y.
    Nor, N. A. M.
    Taib, N. A.
    Ganggayah, M. D.
    Town, C.
    Dhillon, S. K.
    FOLIA BIOLOGICA, 2019, 65 (5-6) : 212 - 220
  • [3] Prediction in Cancer Genomics Using Topological Signatures and Machine Learning
    Gonzalez, Georgina
    Ushakova, Arina
    Sazdanovic, Radmila
    Arsuaga, Javier
    TOPOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS, ABEL SYMPOSIUM 2018, 2020, 15 : 247 - 276
  • [4] Prediction of Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Mangal, Anuj
    Jain, Vinod
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON I-SMAC (IOT IN SOCIAL, MOBILE, ANALYTICS AND CLOUD) (I-SMAC 2021), 2021, : 464 - 466
  • [5] Breast Cancer Prediction using Machine Learning Models
    Iparraguirre-Villanueva, Orlando
    Epifania-Huerta, Andres
    Torres-Ceclen, Carmen
    Ruiz-Alvarado, John
    Cabanillas-Carbonell, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 14 (02) : 610 - 620
  • [6] BREAST CANCER PREDICTION USING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES
    Kiran, B. Kranthi
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS OF CONTINUA AND MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 14 (06): : 149 - 155
  • [7] Prognostic prediction of gastric cancer based on H&E findings and machine learning pathomics
    Han, Guoda
    Liu, Xu
    Gao, Tian
    Zhang, Lei
    Zhang, Xiaoling
    Wei, Xiaonan
    Lin, Yecheng
    Yin, Bohong
    MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 2024, 78
  • [8] Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Using Deep Learning
    Bae, Min Sun
    Kim, Hyug-Gi
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 301 (03) : 559 - 560
  • [9] Prediction of survival and metastasis in breast cancer patients using machine learning classifiers
    Tapak, Leili
    Shirmohammadi-Khorram, Nasrin
    Amini, Payam
    Alafchi, Behnaz
    Hamidi, Omid
    Poorolajal, Jalal
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 7 (03): : 293 - 299
  • [10] Mortality Prediction Modeling for Patients with Breast Cancer Based on Explainable Machine Learning
    Park, Sang Won
    Park, Ye-Lin
    Lee, Eun-Gyeong
    Chae, Heejung
    Park, Phillip
    Choi, Dong-Woo
    Choi, Yeon Ho
    Hwang, Juyeon
    Ahn, Seohyun
    Kim, Keunkyun
    Kim, Woo Jin
    Kong, Sun-Young
    Jung, So-Youn
    Kim, Hyun-Jin
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (22)