Determining research priorities using machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Thomas, B. A. [1 ]
Buonomo, A. [1 ]
Thronson, H. [2 ]
Barbier, L. [3 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Heliophys Sci Div, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, 8800 Greenbelt Rd, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[2] NASA, 617 Tivoli Passage, Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
[3] NASA Headquarters, Off Chief Scientist, 300 E St SW, Washington, DC 20546 USA
关键词
Machine learning; Strategic planning; Astronomy research;
D O I
10.1016/j.ascom.2024.100879
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We summarize our exploratory investigation into whether Machine Learning (ML) techniques applied to publicly available professional text can substantially augment strategic planning for astronomy. We find that an approach based on Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) using content drawn from astronomy journal papers can be used to infer high-priority research areas. While the LDA models are challenging to interpret, we find that they may be strongly associated with meaningful keywords and scientific papers which allow for human interpretation of the topic models. Significant correlation is found between the results of applying these models to the previous decade of astronomical research ("1998-2010"corpus) and the contents of the Science Frontier Panels report which contains high-priority research areas identified by the 2010 National Academies' Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey ("DS2010"corpus). Significant correlations also exist between model results of the 1998-2010 corpus and the submitted whitepapers to the Decadal Survey ("whitepapers"corpus). Importantly, we derive predictive metrics based on these results which can provide leading indicators of which content modeled by the topic models will become highly cited in the future. Using these identified metrics and the associations between papers and topic models it is possible to identify important papers for planners to consider. A preliminary version of our work was presented by Thronson et al. (2021) and Thomas et al. (2022).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determining Research Priorities Using Machine Learning
    Thomas, Brian A.
    Thronson, Harley
    Buonomo, Anthony
    Barbier, Louis
    [J]. arXiv,
  • [2] DETERMINING RESEARCH PRIORITIES
    KRISTEIN, MM
    [J]. CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE-MEDECINE CLINIQUE ET EXPERIMENTALE, 1983, 6 (02): : 57 - 58
  • [3] Determining usefulness of machine learning in materials discovery using simulated research landscapes
    del Cueto, Marcos
    Troisi, Alessandro
    [J]. PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 23 (26) : 14156 - 14163
  • [4] Determining the Appeal of an Image Using Machine Learning
    Potchen, Joe
    Lee, Daemin
    Wein, Jason
    Burns, Leland
    Hedden, Kyle
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 ANNUAL ACM SOUTHEAST CONFERENCE (ACMSE 2019), 2019, : 264 - 265
  • [5] METHODS OF DETERMINING PRIORITIES IN A PROGRAM OF RESEARCH
    MOORE, RL
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1974, EM21 (04) : 126 - 140
  • [6] Determining priorities in intellectual disability research
    Holland, Tony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2008, 52 : 1 - 2
  • [7] METHODS OF DETERMINING PRIORITIES IN A PROGRAMME OF RESEARCH
    MOORE, RL
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 1975, 5 : 66 - 80
  • [8] Using machine learning for NEETs and sustainability studies: Determining best machine learning algorithms
    Berigel, Muhammet
    Boztas, Gizem Dilan
    Rocca, Antonella
    Neagu, Gabriela
    [J]. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2024, 94
  • [9] Determining satellite infall times using machine learning
    Barrnendoo, Stan
    Cautun, Marius
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 520 (02) : 1704 - 1720
  • [10] Determining context of association rules by using machine learning
    Nisar, Kanwal
    Shaheen, Muhammad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & THEORETICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 35 (01) : 59 - 76