Integrating randomized and observational studies to estimate optimal dynamic treatment regimes

被引:0
|
作者
Batorsky, Anna [1 ]
Anstrom, Kevin J. [1 ]
Zeng, Donglin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Biostat, 135 Dauer Dr 3101 McGavran Greenberg Hall,CB 7420, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
augmentation; Back Pain Consortium; data integration; doubly robust; precision medicine; Q-learning; TREATMENT STRATEGIES; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1093/biomtc/ujae046
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) are the gold standard for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs), but are costly and require a large sample size. We introduce the multi-stage augmented Q-learning estimator (MAQE) to improve efficiency of estimation of optimal DTRs by augmenting SMART data with observational data. Our motivating example comes from the Back Pain Consortium, where one of the overarching aims is to learn how to tailor treatments for chronic low back pain to individual patient phenotypes, knowledge which is lacking clinically. The Consortium-wide collaborative SMART and observational studies within the Consortium collect data on the same participant phenotypes, treatments, and outcomes at multiple time points, which can easily be integrated. Previously published single-stage augmentation methods for integration of trial and observational study (OS) data were adapted to estimate optimal DTRs from SMARTs using Q-learning. Simulation studies show the MAQE, which integrates phenotype, treatment, and outcome information from multiple studies over multiple time points, more accurately estimates the optimal DTR, and has a higher average value than a comparable Q-learning estimator without augmentation. We demonstrate this improvement is robust to a wide range of trial and OS sample sizes, addition of noise variables, and effect sizes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimating optimal treatment regimes via subgroup identification in randomized control trials and observational studies
    Fu, Haoda
    Zhou, Jin
    Faries, Douglas E.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (19) : 3285 - 3302
  • [3] C-learning: A new classification framework to estimate optimal dynamic treatment regimes
    Zhang, Baqun
    Zhang, Min
    BIOMETRICS, 2018, 74 (03) : 891 - 899
  • [4] Demystifying optimal dynamic treatment regimes
    Moodie, Erica E. M.
    Richardson, Thomas S.
    Stephens, David A.
    BIOMETRICS, 2007, 63 (02) : 447 - 455
  • [5] Estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes
    Zhao, Ying-Qi
    Laber, Eric B.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2014, 11 (04) : 400 - 407
  • [6] Restricted sub-tree learning to estimate an optimal dynamic treatment regime using observational data
    Speth, Kelly
    Wang, Lu
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (26) : 5796 - 5812
  • [7] Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes and Partial Welfare Ordering
    Han, Sukjin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023,
  • [8] Optimal dynamic treatment regimes - Discussion on the paper by Murphy
    Arjas, E
    Jennison, C
    Dawid, AP
    Cox, DR
    Cowell, RG
    Didelez, V
    Gill, RD
    Kadane, JB
    Robins, JM
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2003, 65 : 355 - 366
  • [9] Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes With Survival Outcomes
    Simoneau, Gabrielle
    Moodie, Erica E. M.
    Nijjar, Jagtar S.
    Platt, Robert W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 115 (531) : 1531 - 1539
  • [10] Regret-Regression for Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes
    Henderson, Robin
    Ansell, Phil
    Alshibani, Deyadeen
    BIOMETRICS, 2010, 66 (04) : 1192 - 1201