Teleworkability and its heterogeneity in labor market shock

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Dandan [1 ]
Luo, Chuliang [2 ]
Zi, Yiran [3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, China Ctr Econ Res, Natl Sch Dev, Chengze Campus,5 Yiheyuan Rd, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] China Renmin Univ, Sch Lab & Human Resources, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Natl Sch Dev, Chengze Campus,5 Yiheyuan Rd, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
关键词
Digital job; Teleworkability; Economic shock; Labor market; COVID-19;
D O I
10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101741
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The rapid development of information and communication technologies has brought about a marked change in work patterns, with teleworking emerging as a vital and complementary form of employment. The COVID-19 outbreak in 2020 led to widespread social isolation, accelerating the adoption of teleworking. Following Dingel and Neiman (2020), we construct a teleworkability index for over 4539 employees and analyze the dynamic changes in their working status in China. Our findings suggest that business and technical workers are more likely to work remotely than essential labor workers. Highly educated female workers who live in the southeast of China show the advantage of working from home. Further regression estimation indicates that, throughout 2020, workers with a higher teleworkability index can better cope with adverse shocks from the pandemic with higher return -to -work rates and higher productivity. In contrast, those with a lower teleworkability index face challenges in job retention and suffer from higher unemployment rates and severe income losses. In addition, the teleworkability index is positively associated with mental health status. This study highlights the most vulnerable segment in the labor market, those with low teleworkability, should be well targeted by the social security system.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Labor heterogeneity in an urban labor market
    Sato, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2001, 50 (02) : 313 - 337
  • [2] Regional differences in the epidemic shock on the local labor market and its spread
    Kazekami, Sachiko
    [J]. LABOUR-ENGLAND, 2022, 36 (01): : 115 - 144
  • [3] Heterogeneity, selection and labor market disparities
    Bonfiglioli, Alessandra
    Gancia, Gino
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2019, 31 : 305 - 325
  • [4] Spatial Heterogeneity in Amenity and Labor Market Migration
    Rijnks, Richard Henry
    Koster, Sierdjan
    McCann, Philip
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2018, 41 (02) : 183 - 209
  • [5] Labor Market Models of Worker and Firm Heterogeneity
    Lentz, Rasmus
    Mortensen, Dale T.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 2, 2010, 2 : 577 - 602
  • [6] Heterogeneity in the Labor Market: Ability and Information Acquisition∗
    Polachek S.W.
    [J]. Eastern Economic Journal, 2017, 43 (3) : 377 - 390
  • [7] The role of agents' heterogeneity in an imperfect labor market
    Wauthy, X
    Zenou, Y
    [J]. REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 1999, 50 (05): : 965 - 984
  • [8] The labor market effects of trade union heterogeneity
    de Pinto, Marco
    Michaelis, Jochen
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2019, 78 : 60 - 72
  • [9] Labor Market Heterogeneity and the Aggregate Matching Function
    Barnichon, Regis
    Figura, Andrew
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MACROECONOMICS, 2015, 7 (04) : 222 - 249
  • [10] Monetary Policy, Labor Market, and Sectoral Heterogeneity
    Singh, Aarti
    Suda, Jacek
    Zervou, Anastasia
    [J]. AEA PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 112 : 491 - 495