Clinical Evaluation of Deep Learning for Tumor Delineation on 18F-FDG PET/CT of Head and Neck Cancer

Artificial intelligence (AI) may decrease 18 F - FDG PET/CT-based gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation variability and automate tumorvolume-derived image biomarker extraction. Hence, we aimed to identify and evaluate promising state-of-the-art deep learning methods for head and neck cancer (HNC) PET GTV delineation. Methods: We trained and evaluated deep learning methods using retrospectively included scans of HNC patients referred for radiotherapy between January 2014 and December 2019 (ISRCTN16907234). We used 3 test datasets: an internal set to compare methods, another internal set to compare AI-to-expert variability and expert interobserver variability (IOV), and an external set to compare internal and external AI-to-expert variability. Expert PET GTVs were used as the reference standard. Our benchmark IOV was measured using the PET GTV of 6 experts. The primary outcome was the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). ANOVA was used to compare methods, a paired t test was used to compare AI-to-expert variability and expert IOV, an unpaired t test was used to compare internal and external AI-toexpert variability, and post hoc Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate biomarker agreement. Results: In total, 1,220 18 F - FDG PET/CT scans of 1,190 patients (mean age +/- SD, 63 +/- 10 y; 858 men) were included, and 5 deep learning methods were trained using 5-fold cross-validation ( n = 805). The nnU-Net method achieved the highest similarity (DSC, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.77-0.86]; n = 196). We found no evidence of a difference between expert IOV and AI-to-expert variability (DSC, 0.78 for AI vs. 0.82 for experts; mean difference of 0.04 [95% CI, - 0.01 to 0.09]; P = 0.12; n = 64). We found no evidence of a difference between the internal and external AI-to-expert variability (DSC, 0.80 internally vs. 0.81 externally; mean difference of 0.004 [95% CI, - 0.05 to 0.04]; P = 0.87; n = 125). PET GTV-derived biomarkers of AI were in good agreement with experts. Conclusion: Deep learning can be used to automate 18 F - FDG PET/CT tumorvolume-derived imaging biomarkers, and the deep-learning-based volumes have the potential to assist clinical tumor volume delineation in radiation oncology.