Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy Versus the Wafer Procedure in the Treatment of Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Jung, Hyoung-Seok [1 ]
Kim, Chul-Ho [2 ]
Kim, Dong-Hyun [2 ]
Choi, Yun-Rak [3 ]
Lee, Jae -Sung [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Gwangmyeong Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 110 Deokan Ro, Gwangmyeong 14353, Gyeonggi, South Korea
[2] Chung Ang Univ, Coll Med, Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Hosp Chung Ang Univ Med, Dept Orthropaed Surg, 224-1 Heukseok Dong, Seoul 156755, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME | 2024年 / 49卷 / 05期
关键词
Meta-analysis; ulnar impaction syndrome; ulnar shortening osteotomy; wafer procedure; FIBROCARTILAGE COMPLEX DEBRIDEMENT; ULNOCARPAL ABUTMENT; RESECTION; OUTCOMES; DORSAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.08.029
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Ulnar impaction syndrome is a common cause of ulnar wrist pain. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are any differences between ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) and the wafer procedure (WP) in terms of clinical outcomes, radiologic outcome, and postoperative complication rate by means of a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically for studies published before August 22, 2021, that compared USO and the WP for ulnar impaction syndrome. The pooled analysis was designed to compare the visual analog scale pain score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, modified Mayo score, postoperative ulnar variance, and complication rate between USO and WP. Results: The initial literature search yielded 72 articles. After applying our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 5 studies were eligible for the qualitative and quantitative data syntheses. Surgical indications for performing USO or WP were similar in all patients with idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome. There were no significant differences in the visual analog scale score (P = .73), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (P = .09), modified Mayo score (Positive outcome, P = .85/Negative outcome, P = .39), postoperative ulnar variance (P = .29), and complications, other than implant irritation (P = .42), between the USO and WP groups. However, overall complication rate was higher in patients treated with USO (P < .05). Conclusions: The WP and USO for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome achieve similar clinical and radiologic outcomes. Although overall complications are significantly more frequent in patients treated with USO, complications not including implant irritation are similar in both groups. (c) 2024 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.) Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic IV.
引用
收藏
页码:493.e1 / 493.e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Arthroscopic wafer procedure versus ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shi, Haifeng
    Huang, Yongjing
    Shen, Yong
    Wu, Ke
    Zhang, Zhihai
    Li, Qian
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [2] Arthroscopic wafer procedure versus ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haifeng Shi
    Yongjing Huang
    Yong Shen
    Ke Wu
    Zhihai Zhang
    Qian Li
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 19
  • [3] Is ulnar shortening osteotomy or the wafer procedure better for ulnar impaction syndrome?: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ha, Joong Won
    Kwon, Young Woo
    Lee, Sujung
    Lim, Hyunsun
    Lee, Jinho
    Lim, Chae Kwang
    Lee, Jun-Ku
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (39) : E35141
  • [4] Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure Versus Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy as a Surgical Treatment for Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome
    Oh, Won-Taek
    Kang, Ho-Jung
    Chun, Yong-Min
    Koh, Il-Hyun
    An, Hae-Mo-Su
    Choi, Yun-Rak
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (02): : 421 - 430
  • [5] Ulnar shortening osteotomy vs. wafer resection for ulnar impaction syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Hao
    Wang, Ting
    Wang, Yansheng
    Zhu, Yue
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 104
  • [6] Ulnar shortening osteotomy vs. wafer resection for ulnar impaction syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Lei
    Fu, Weili
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 109 (12) : 4373 - 4374
  • [7] Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure Versus Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Treatment of Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Afifi, Ahmed
    Ali, Abdelaziz Monsef
    Abdelaziz, Ashraf
    Abuomira, Ibrahim E.
    Saleh, Waleed Riad
    Yehya, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2022, 47 (08): : 745 - 751
  • [8] Comparison of ulnar shortening osteotomy and the wafer resection procedure as treatment for ulnar impaction syndrome
    Constantine, KJ
    Tomaino, MM
    Herndon, JH
    Sotereanos, DG
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 25A (01): : 55 - 60
  • [9] Is metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy superior to diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy in the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome? A meta-analysis
    Deng, Hai-Lin
    Lu, Ming-Ling
    Tang, Zhe-Ming
    Mao, Qing-Long
    Zhao, Jin-Min
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2023, 11 (12)
  • [10] Is metaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy superior to diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy in the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome? A meta-analysis
    Hai-Lin Deng
    Ming-Ling Lu
    Zhe-Ming Tang
    Qing-Long Mao
    Jin-Min Zhao
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2023, (12) : 2753 - 2765