Trade-offs in concentration sensing in dynamic environments

被引:1
|
作者
Kashyap, Aparajita [1 ]
Wang, Wei [2 ]
Camley, Brian A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Biophys, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, William H Miller Dept Phys & Astron 3, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
FOLIC-ACID; CHEMOTAXIS; BACTERIA; CELLS; LIMIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpj.2024.03.025
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
When cells measure concentrations of chemical signals, they may average multiple measurements over time in order to reduce noise in their measurements. However, when cells are in an environment that changes over time, past measurements may not reflect current conditions-creating a new source of error that trades off against noise in chemical sensing. What statistics in the cell's environment control this trade-off? What properties of the environment make it variable enough that this trade-off is relevant? We model a single eukaryotic cell sensing a chemical secreted from bacteria (e.g., folic acid). In this case, the environment changes because the bacteria swim-leading to changes in the true concentration at the cell. We develop analytical calculations and stochastic simulations of sensing in this environment. We find that cells can have a huge variety of optimal sensing strategies ranging from not time averaging at all to averaging over an arbitrarily long time or having a finite optimal averaging time. The factors that primarily control the ideal averaging are the ratio of sensing noise to environmental variation and the ratio of timescales of sensing to the timescale of environmental variation. Sensing noise depends on the receptor-ligand kinetics, while environmental variation depends on the density of bacteria and the degradation and diffusion properties of the secreted chemoattractant. Our results suggest that fluctuating environmental concentrations may be a relevant source of noise even in a relatively static environment.
引用
收藏
页码:1184 / 1194
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stakeholders and tropical reforestation: challenges, trade-offs, and strategies in dynamic environments
    Lazos-Chavero, Elena
    Zinda, John
    Bennett-Curry, Aoife
    Balvanera, Patricia
    Bloomfield, Gillian
    Lindell, Catherine
    Negra, Christine
    [J]. BIOTROPICA, 2016, 48 (06) : 900 - 914
  • [2] Trade-Offs and Constraints in Allosteric Sensing
    Martins, Bruno M. C.
    Swain, Peter S.
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 7 (11)
  • [3] Analysing trade-offs in frameworks for the design of smart environments
    Ardito, Carmelo
    Desolda, Giuseppe
    Lanzilotti, Rosa
    Malizia, Alessio
    Matera, Maristella
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 39 (01) : 47 - 71
  • [4] Power-Latency Trade-offs in Virtualized Environments
    Dargie, Waltenegus
    Wen, Jianjun
    [J]. 2014 28TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INFORMATION NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS WORKSHOPS (WAINA), 2014, : 398 - 403
  • [5] Efficient search and responsiveness trade-offs in a Markov chain model of evolution in dynamic environments
    Menezes, Amor A.
    Kabamba, Pierre T.
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 2016, 276 : 44 - 58
  • [6] Spatial locality trade-offs of wavelet-based applications in dynamic execution environments
    Geelen, Bert
    Ferentinos, Aris
    Catthoor, Francky
    Lafruit, Gauthier
    Verkest, Diederik
    [J]. 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOLS 1-12, 2008, : 1461 - 1464
  • [7] The cricket and the ant:: Organizational trade-offs in changing environments
    Peli, Gabor
    Bruggeman, Jeroen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2007, 31 (03): : 205 - 235
  • [8] Trade-offs
    Garland, Theodore, Jr.
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (02) : R60 - R61
  • [9] Debate: Public value trade-offs and methodological trade-offs
    Bozeman, Barry
    [J]. PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 28 (03) : 135 - 136
  • [10] Communication and sensing trade-offs in cooperative mobile networks
    Mostofi, Yasamin
    Murray, Richard M.
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2008, 10 (02) : 156 - 170