Re-evaluating efficacy of vaccines against highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in poultry: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Tseng, IShin [1 ]
Pan, Bing-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Yen-Chen [3 ]
Fang, Chi-Tai [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Coll Publ Hlth, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Taiwan Ctr Dis Control, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Hlth Data Analyt & Stat, Coll Publ Hlth, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ, Sch Med, Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Natl Taiwan Univ, Infect Dis Res & Educ Ctr, Minist Hlth & Welf, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Highly pathogenic avian influenza; HPAI; Vaccine; Vaccine efficacy; Meta; -analysis; PROTECTIVE EFFICACY; H5N1; VIRUS; CHICKENS; TRANSMISSION; H9N2; H7;
D O I
10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100714
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The global spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A (H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b virus since 2021 necessitates a re-evaluation of the role of vaccination in controlling HPAI outbreaks among poultry, which has been controversial because of the concern of silent spread with viral mutation and spillover to human. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed all existing data from experimental challenge trials to assess the efficacy of HPAI vaccines against mortality in specific pathogen free (SPF) chickens, with evaluation of the certainty of evidence (CoE) using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Out of 223 screened publications, 46 trials met our eligibility criteria. Inactivated vaccines showed an efficacy of 95% (risk ratio [RR] = 5% [95% CI: 1% to 17%], I2 = 0%, CoE high) against homologous strains and an efficacy of 78% (RR = 22% [95% CI: 14% to 37%], I2 = 18%, CoE high) against heterologous strains (test for subgroup difference p = 0.02). Live recombinant vaccines exhibited the highest efficacy at 97% (RR = 3% [95% CI: 1% to 13%], I2 = 0%, CoE high). Inactivated recombinant vaccines had an overall efficacy of 90% (RR = 10% [95% CI: 6% to 16%], I2 = 47%, CoE high). Commercial vaccines showed an overall efficacy of 91% (RR = 9% [95% CI: 5% to 17%], I2 = 23%, CoE high), with 96% efficacy (RR = 4% [95% CI: 1% to 21%], I2 = 0%, CoE high) against homologous strains and 90% efficacy (RR = 10% [95% CI: 5% to 20%], I2 = 31%, CoE moderate) against heterologous strains. Our systematic review offers an updated and unbiased assessment of vaccine efficacy against HPAI-related mortality, providing timely and crucial information for re-evaluating the role of vaccination in poultry avian influenza control policy amist the global HPAI outbreak post-2021.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Virus Shedding of Avian Influenza in Poultry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Germeraad, Evelien A.
    Sanders, Pim
    Hagenaars, Thomas J.
    de Jong, Mart C. M.
    Beerens, Nancy
    Gonzales, Jose L.
    [J]. VIRUSES-BASEL, 2019, 11 (09):
  • [2] Vaccine efficacy against Indonesian Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Villanueva-Cabezas, Juan P.
    Coppo, Mauricio J. C.
    Durr, Peter A.
    McVernon, Jodie
    [J]. VACCINE, 2017, 35 (37) : 4859 - 4869
  • [3] Efficacy of Avian Influenza Vaccine in Poultry: A Meta-analysis
    Hsu, Shu-Mei
    Chen, Tony Hsiu-Hsi
    Wang, Ching-Ho
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 2010, 54 (04) : 1197 - 1209
  • [4] Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Osterholm, Michael T.
    Kelley, Nicholas S.
    Sommer, Alfred
    Belongia, Edward A.
    [J]. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 12 (01): : 36 - 44
  • [5] Prediction of highly pathogenic avian influenza vaccine efficacy in chickens by comparison of in vitro and in vivo data: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Mo, Jongseo
    Spackman, Erica
    Swayne, David E.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2023, 41 (38) : 5507 - 5517
  • [6] Highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bonilla-Aldana, D. Katterine
    Calle-Hernandez, Dayana M.
    Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R.
    Alarcon-Braga, Esteban A.
    Hernandez-Bustamante, Enrique A.
    Cabrera-Guzman, Juan C.
    Quispe-Vasquez, Sthephanie M.
    Huayta-Cortez, Miguel A.
    Benites-Zapata, Vicente A.
    Rodriguez-Morales, Alfonso J.
    [J]. NEW MICROBES AND NEW INFECTIONS, 2024, 60-61
  • [7] Interventions in Live Poultry Markets for the Control of Avian Influenza: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Shi, Naiyang
    Huang, Jinxin
    Zhang, Xuefeng
    Bao, Changjun
    Yue, Na
    Wang, Qiang
    Cui, Tingting
    Zheng, Mengyun
    Huo, Xiang
    Jin, Hui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 221 (04): : 553 - 560
  • [8] Re-Evaluating the Role for Revascularisation in Stable Coronary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sultana, Nushrat
    Nerlekar, Nitesh
    White, Anthony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (16) : S15 - S15
  • [9] Serological evidence of human infections with highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xinhua Chen
    Wei Wang
    Yan Wang
    Shengjie Lai
    Juan Yang
    Benjamin J. Cowling
    Peter W. Horby
    Timothy M. Uyeki
    Hongjie Yu
    [J]. BMC Medicine, 18
  • [10] Serological evidence of human infections with highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Xinhua
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Yan
    Lai, Shengjie
    Yang, Juan
    Cowling, Benjamin J.
    Horby, Peter W.
    Uyeki, Timothy M.
    Yu, Hongjie
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2020, 18 (01)