UAS procedures model with system architecture for safety analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Mathou, Charles [1 ]
Delmas, Kevin [2 ]
de Saqui-Sannes, Pierre [1 ]
Chaudemar, Jean-Charles [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse, Federat ENAC, ISAE SUPAERO ONERA, Toulouse, France
[2] Off Natl Etud & Rech Aerosp, Toulouse, France
关键词
AltaRica; MBSA; UAS; Procedure;
D O I
10.1109/ICUAS60882.2024.10557098
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
As the number of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) keeps increasing, so do the safety risks they pose. One way of maintaining an acceptable risk level is that operational procedures are adequately designed and proven. Model-based approaches involve modeling procedures as a sequence of tasks with inputs and outputs. These tasks abstract away the complexity of the subsystem or actor who performs them. However, UAS procedures typically involve multiple actors and subsystems, each of which contributes to the risk of the operation. Accounting for these heterogeneous risk contributors allows new failure propagation paths to be revealed, understood and patched, leading to increased safety. In order to achieve this, we propose a methodology to connect the safety models of such contributors to our previous procedure models. We discuss and illustrate this methodology on a medium-sized fixed-wing UAV. We connect our procedure models to the UAV's functional architecture model, and use them to generate minimal sequences leading to a crash of the UAV. New sequences illustrating the contribution of the UAV's architecture are revealed that did not appear in our previous work on UAS procedures. This provides an opportunity to explore the contribution of the system's architecture to its overall safety through the procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 880
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety Analysis Paradigm for UAS Development and Use of a Common Architecture and Fault Tree Model
    Hammer, Jonathan
    Murray, Alexander R.
    Lowman, Alexa
    [J]. 2017 IEEE/AIAA 36TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2017,
  • [2] Modeling the Safety Architecture of UAS Flight Operations
    Denney, Ewen
    Pai, Ganesh
    Whiteside, Iain
    [J]. COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY, SAFECOMP 2017, 2017, 10488 : 162 - 178
  • [3] Modeling UAS Flight Procedures for SORA Safety Objectives
    Mathou, Charles
    Delmas, Kevin
    Chaudemar, Jean-Charles
    de Saqui-Sannes, Pierre
    [J]. 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, SYSCON, 2023,
  • [4] Security analysis and enhancements of UAS architecture
    Akhtar, Bilal
    Masood, Ammar
    [J]. INFORMATION SECURITY JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (03): : 173 - 186
  • [5] A ConOps derived UAS safety risk model
    Luxhoj, James T.
    Joyce, William
    Luxhoj, Carl
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2021, 24 (07) : 796 - 818
  • [6] UAS - WSN SYSTEMS, A PERSPECTIVE ON COMMUNICATION SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
    MILITARU, Gabriel
    POPESCU, Dan
    [J]. UNIVERSITY POLITEHNICA OF BUCHAREST SCIENTIFIC BULLETIN SERIES C-ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2022, 84 (01): : 51 - 62
  • [7] LARISSA: Layered Architecture Model for Interconnection of Systems in UAS
    Marconato, Emerson A.
    Pigatto, Daniel F.
    Branco, Kalinka R. L. J. C.
    Branco, Luiz Henrique C.
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (ICUAS), 2014, : 20 - 31
  • [8] UAS – WSN SYSTEMS, A PERSPECTIVE ON COMMUNICATION SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
    Militaru, Gabriel
    Popescu, Dan
    [J]. UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series C: Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2022, 84 (01): : 51 - 62
  • [9] RISK-ANALYSIS PROCEDURES ENSURE SYSTEM SAFETY
    MANNAN, M
    PFENNING, DB
    ZINN, CD
    [J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1991, 89 (22) : 83 - 87
  • [10] Research on UAS Safety and Security using System Thinking
    Hu, Jianbo
    Fan, Tao
    Han, Linxiao
    Xu, Weihua
    Wu, Jun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED SYSTEMS (ICUS), 2020, : 178 - 183