Co-producing digital mental health interventions: A systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Brotherdale, Rebecca [1 ,2 ]
Berry, Katherine [1 ,2 ]
Branitsky, Alison [2 ]
Bucci, Sandra [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Psychol & Mental Hlth, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester, England
[2] Greater Manchester Mental Hlth NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Div Psychol & Mental Hlth, 2nd Floor,Zochonis Bldg,Brunswick St, Manchester M13 9PL, England
来源
DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 10卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Co-production; involvement; digital mental health; mHealth; mental health; PATIENT; COPRODUCTION; METAANALYSIS; SYMPTOMS; ANXIETY; PEOPLE; ADULTS; APPS;
D O I
10.1177/20552076241239172
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Smartphone apps (apps) are widely recognised as promising tools for improving access to mental healthcare. However, a key challenge is the development of digital interventions that are acceptable to end users. Co-production with providers and stakeholders is increasingly positioned as the gold standard for improving uptake, engagement, and healthcare outcomes. Nevertheless, clear guidance around the process of co-production is lacking. The objectives of this review were to: (i) present an overview of the methods and approaches to co-production when designing, producing, and evaluating digital mental health interventions; and (ii) explore the barriers and facilitators affecting co-production in this context.Methods A pre-registered (CRD42023414007) systematic review was completed in accordance with The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Five databases were searched. A co-produced bespoke quality appraisal tool was developed with an expert by experience to assess the quality of the co-production methods and approaches. A narrative synthesis was conducted.Results Twenty-six studies across 24 digital mental health interventions met inclusion criteria. App interventions were rarely co-produced with end users throughout all stages of design, development, and evaluation. Co-producing digital mental health interventions added value by creating culturally sensitive and acceptable interventions. Reported challenges included resource issues exacerbated by the digital nature of the intervention, variability across stakeholder suggestions, and power imbalances between stakeholders and researchers.Conclusions Variation in approaches to co-producing digital mental health interventions is evident, with inconsistencies between stakeholder groups involved, stage of involvement, stakeholders' roles and methods employed.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What is psychiatry? Co-producing complexity in mental health
    Pickersgill, Martyn
    [J]. SOCIAL THEORY & HEALTH, 2012, 10 (04) : 328 - 347
  • [2] What is psychiatry? Co-producing complexity in mental health
    Martyn Pickersgill
    [J]. Social Theory & Health, 2012, 10 : 328 - 347
  • [3] Digital mental health interventions for people with epilepsy: A systematic review
    Lecce, Francesca
    Smith, Chelsie R.
    Burbach, Frank R.
    [J]. SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2023, 107 : 91 - 103
  • [4] The Safety of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review and Recommendations
    Taher, Rayan
    Hsu, Che-Wei
    Hampshire, Chloe
    Fialho, Carolina
    Heaysman, Clare
    Stahl, Daniel
    Shergill, Sukhi
    Yiend, Jenny
    [J]. JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2023, 10
  • [5] The Effect of Digital Mental Health Literacy Interventions on Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yeo, Geckhong
    Reich, Stephanie M.
    Liaw, Nicole A.
    Chia, Elizabeth Yee Min
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [6] Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review
    Domhardt, Matthias
    Engler, Sophie
    Nowak, Hannah
    Lutsch, Arne
    Baumel, Amit
    Baumeister, Harald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (11)
  • [7] A systematic review and meta analysis on digital mental health interventions in inpatient settings
    Diel, Alexander
    Schroeter, Isabel Carolin
    Frewer, Anna-Lena
    Jansen, Christoph
    Robitzsch, Anita
    Gradl-Dietsch, Gertraud
    Teufel, Martin
    Baeuerle, Alexander
    [J]. NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 7 (01):
  • [8] User engagement in clinical trials of digital mental health interventions: a systematic review
    Elkes, Jack
    Cro, Suzie
    Batchelor, Rachel
    O'Connor, Siobhan
    Yu, Ly-Mee
    Bell, Lauren
    Harris, Victoria
    Sin, Jacqueline
    Cornelius, Victoria
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [9] Systematic Review and Critique of Methods for Economic Evaluation of Digital Mental Health Interventions
    Jankovic, Dina
    Bojke, Laura
    Marshall, David
    Goncalves, Pedro Saramago
    Churchill, Rachel
    Melton, Hollie
    Brabyn, Sally
    Gega, Lina
    [J]. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2021, 19 (01) : 17 - 27
  • [10] Digital health behaviour change interventions in severe mental illness: a systematic review
    Sawyer, Chelsea
    Mckeon, Grace
    Hassan, Lamiece
    Onyweaka, Henry
    Martinez Agulleiro, Luis
    Guinart, Daniel
    Torous, John
    Firth, Joseph
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 53 (15) : 6965 - 7005