Shifting Between Mental Sets: An Individual Differences Approach to Commonalities and Differences of Task Switching Components

被引:32
|
作者
von Bastian, Claudia C. [1 ,2 ]
Druey, Michel D. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Cognit & Cognit Neurosci Res Ctr, Dept Psychol, Poole, Dorset, England
[2] Univ Zurich, Dept Psychol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Gloucestershire, Psychol, Sch Nat & Social Sci, Cheltenham, Glos, England
关键词
task switching; individual differences; executive functions; unity and diversity; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; LATENT VARIABLE APPROACH; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; COGNITIVE CONTROL; CHOICE-REACTION; RESPONSE SELECTION; FUNCTIONS PREDICT; AGE-DIFFERENCES; REACTION-TIME; SAMPLE-SIZE;
D O I
10.1037/xge0000333
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Switching between mental sets has been extensively investigated in both experimental and individual differences research using a wide range of task-switch paradigms. However, it is yet unclear whether these different tasks measure a unitary shifting ability or reflect different facets thereof. In this study, 20 task pairs were administered to 119 young adults to assess 5 proposed components of mental set shifting: switching between judgments, stimulus dimensions, stimulus-response mappings, response sets, and stimulus sets. Modeling latent factors for each of the components revealed that a model with 5 separate yet mostly correlated factors fit the data best. In this model, the components most strongly related to the other latent factors were stimulus-response mapping shifting and, to a lesser degree, response set shifting. In addition, both factors were statistically indistinguishable from a second-order general shifting factor. In contrast, shifting between judgments as well as stimulus dimensions consistently required separate factors and could, hence, not fully be accounted for by the general shifting factor. Finally, shifting between stimulus sets was unrelated to any other shifting component but mapping shifting. We conclude that tasks assessing shifting between mappings are most adequate to assess general shifting ability. In contrast, shifting between stimulus sets (e.g., as in the Trail Making Test) probably reflects shifts in visual attention rather than executive shifting ability.
引用
收藏
页码:1266 / 1285
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring individual differences in task switching
    Li, Bingxin
    Li, Xiangqian
    Stoet, Gijsbert
    Lages, Martin
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2019, 193 : 80 - 95
  • [2] A neural network model of individual differences in task switching abilities
    Herd, Seth A.
    O'Reilly, Randall C.
    Hazy, Tom E.
    Chatham, Christopher H.
    Brant, Angela M.
    Friedman, Naomi P.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2014, 62 : 375 - 389
  • [3] Commonalities and Differences between Requirements Engineering Tools: A Quantitative Approach
    Carrillo de Gea, Juan M.
    Niclolas, Joaquin
    Fernandez-Aleman, Jose L.
    Toval, Ambrosio
    Ebert, Christof
    Vizcaino, Aurora
    COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2015, 12 (01) : 257 - 288
  • [4] Differences and commonalities between connectionism and symbolicism
    Wang, SJ
    Liu, YY
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL NETWORKS - ISNN 2005, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3496 : 34 - 38
  • [6] From individual to joint action: representational commonalities and differences
    Wong, Hong Yo
    COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2014, 15 (01) : S12 - S12
  • [7] Towards an approach to mental disorders based on individual differences
    Fossati, Andrea
    WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 10 (02) : 115 - 116
  • [8] Associations between individual differences in approach motivation and effort-based task performance
    Olino, Thomas M.
    Case, Julia A. C.
    Versella, Mark V.
    Cerra, Christina E.
    Genaro, Breana G.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2021, 169
  • [9] Commonalities and differences between scholarly and technical collaboration
    Martin Meyer
    Sujit Bhattacharya
    Scientometrics, 2004, 61 : 443 - 456
  • [10] INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN MENTAL GROWTH
    Freeman, Frank N.
    SCIENTIFIC MONTHLY, 1933, 37 : 263 - 266