Evaluation of borehole interface shear test simulations for cohesive soils under monotonic loading: A comparison of Mohr-Coulomb and constitutive models

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Shen [1 ]
Qamar, Mu'ath I. Abu [2 ]
Suleiman, Muhannad T. [3 ]
Vermaak, Natasha
机构
[1] Lehigh Univ, Dept Mech Engn & Mech, Bethlehem, PA 18017 USA
[2] Yarmouk Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Irbid, Jordan
[3] Lehigh Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Bethlehem, PA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Soil-structure interaction; Interface shear test; Mohr-Coulomb model; Hypoplasticity model; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.finel.2024.104180
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
The Cyclic Interface Shear Test (CIST) device was recently developed to evaluate the response of soil-structure interfaces subjected to monotonic or cyclic loading. Numerical models of the CIST have not been documented. Such simulations may be beneficial to help guide the design of experiments, interpret results, and inform the development of further experimental device modifications. In the present paper, a series of interface shear tests utilizing the CIST system on a cohesive soil under monotonic loadings were simulated using a proposed three-dimensional model in the commercial finite element analysis software ABAQUS/Standard. Comparisons of simulations with experimental results are presented for the Mohr-Coulomb and hypoplasticity models for cohesive soils. It is found that (i) the clay-based hypoplasticity model outperformed the simpler Mohr-Coulomb model in terms of predicting the interface shear stress evolution and the soil volume change and (ii) the clay-based hypoplasticity model allows for identification of trends in shear response as a function of normal confining pressures at the soil-structure interface (e.g. soil-structure interface shear zone thickness). Neither of these capabilities have previously been documented or experimentally validated for cohesive soil-structure interface simulations using clay-based hypoplasticity models.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] A Comparison of Conventional and Shear-Rate Dependent Mohr-Coulomb Models for Simulating Landslides
    Liang Dong-fang
    He Xu-zhen
    JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE, 2014, 11 (06) : 1478 - 1490
  • [2] A comparison of conventional and shear-rate dependent Mohr-Coulomb models for simulating landslides
    Dong-fang Liang
    Xu-zhen He
    Journal of Mountain Science, 2014, 11 : 1478 - 1490
  • [3] COMPARISON OF MOHR-COULOMB AND HARDENING SOIL CONSTITUTIVE MODELS FOR SIMULATION OF SETTLEMENTS IN THE KARKHEH EARTH DAM
    Samadi-Boroujeni, Hossein
    Haghshenas-Adarmanabadi, Amir
    Shayannejad, Mohammad
    Khabbaz, Hadi
    AUSTRALIAN GEOMECHANICS JOURNAL, 2023, 58 (03): : 143 - 158
  • [4] A Comparison of Conventional and Shear-Rate Dependent Mohr-Coulomb Models for Simulating Landslides
    LIANG Dong-fang
    HE Xu-zhen
    Journal of Mountain Science, 2014, 11 (06) : 1478 - 1490
  • [5] Shear behavior at the interface of rough surfaces and cohesive soils under axial loading
    Abu Qamar, Mu'ath I.
    Weimann, Katie
    Khasawneh, Yazen
    Suleiman, Muhannad T.
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 24
  • [6] Monotonic and cyclic tests on kaolin: a database for the development, calibration and verification of constitutive models for cohesive soils with focus to cyclic loading
    Torsten Wichtmann
    Theodoros Triantafyllidis
    Acta Geotechnica, 2018, 13 : 1103 - 1128
  • [7] Monotonic and cyclic tests on kaolin: a database for the development, calibration and verification of constitutive models for cohesive soils with focus to cyclic loading
    Wichtmann, Torsten
    Triantafyllidis, Theodoros
    ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2018, 13 (05) : 1103 - 1128
  • [8] Inspection of four advanced constitutive models for fine-grained soils under monotonic and cyclic loading
    Duque, J.
    Tafili, M.
    Seidalinov, G.
    Masin, D.
    Fuentes, W.
    ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2022, 17 (10) : 4395 - 4418
  • [9] Inspection of four advanced constitutive models for fine-grained soils under monotonic and cyclic loading
    J. Duque
    M. Tafili
    G. Seidalinov
    D. Mašín
    W. Fuentes
    Acta Geotechnica, 2022, 17 : 4395 - 4418