Research Priorities in the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy Among Diploma Therapists: An International Delphi Study

被引:1
|
作者
Chiba, Hiroki [1 ]
Handa, Yusuke [1 ]
Kikkawa, Kazuki [1 ]
Takasaki, Hiroshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Saitama Prefectural Univ, Hlth & Social Serv, Koshigaya, Japan
[2] Saitama Prefectural Univ, Phys Therapy, Koshigaya, Japan
关键词
mckenzie method; musculoskeletal; research priority; physical therapy; delphi method; LOW-BACK-PAIN; NECK PAIN; EXERCISE; DISABILITY; CONSENSUS; SYSTEM; TRIAL;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.62492
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT) is the most researched approach in musculoskeletal physical therapy and involves classifying patients into sub -groups based on their response to loading strategies. MDT diploma therapists (Dip-MDTs) fully recognize the value of MDT in musculoskeletal physical therapy. MDT is updating its system based on the latest research, but the system has not yet been fully established. Therefore, more research is required to increase the comprehensibility of the system. Thus, we aimed to identify future research priorities of MDT. Methods We conducted a modified Delphi study with three rounds. The Research Advisory Committee (RAC) members (n=7) of the McKenzie Institute International were invited to participate in the initial idea generation round. In the subsequent two consensus rounds, Dip-MDTs (n=299) were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the results of the idea generation round using a five -point Likert scale. The criteria for consensus were mean score >4.0, coefficient of variation <= 30%, percent agreement >75%, and quartile deviation <= 1. A post -hoc analysis of the consensus was conducted when the number of participants from a certain country exceeded one-third of the total number of participants. Results The participation rates for each round were 57.1%, 52.2%, and 49.8%. The USA accounted for 43.6% and 44.3% of all participants at the two consensus rounds, respectively. Finally, nine items reached consensus in the second consensus round. After the post -hoc analysis, eight items reached consensus: (1) costeffectiveness, (2) cervical and thoracic spine, (3) extremity classifications, (4) filtered randomized controlled trials (RCTs), (5) spinal source classification, (6) centralization and directional preferences, (7) predictive factors for recurrence, and (8) patient education. Conclusion In this study, we identified the research priorities of MDT that would enhance the completion of the MDT system.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] International Occupational Therapy Research Priorities: A Delphi Study
    Mackenzie, Lynette
    Coppola, Susan
    Alvarez, Liliana
    Cibule, Lolita
    Maltsev, Sergey
    Loh, Siew Yim
    Mlambo, Tecla
    Ikiugu, Moses N.
    Pihlar, Zdenka
    Sriphetcharawut, Sarinya
    Baptiste, Sue
    Ledgerd, Richard
    [J]. OTJR-OCCUPATION PARTICIPATION AND HEALTH, 2017, 37 (02) : 72 - 81
  • [2] CANADIAN THERAPISTS PRIORITIES FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH - A DELPHI STUDY
    MILESTAPPING, C
    DYCK, A
    BRUNHAM, S
    SIMPSON, E
    BARBER, L
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1990, 70 (07): : 448 - 454
  • [3] Research priorities for occupational therapists in Northern Ireland: A Delphi Study
    Kelly, G. P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2012, 75 : 25 - 25
  • [4] Research priorities in regional anaesthesia: an international Delphi study
    Ferry, Jenny
    Lewis, Owen
    Lloyd, James
    El-Boghdadly, Kariem
    Kearns, Rachel
    Albrecht, Eric
    Altermatt, Fernando
    Ashokka, Balakrishnan
    Ayad, Amany E.
    Aziz, Ezzat S.
    Aziz, Lutful
    Jagannathan, Balavenkatasubramanian
    Bouarroudj, Noreddine
    Chin, Ki Jinn
    Delbos, Alain
    de Gracia, Alex
    Ip, Vivian H. Y.
    Kwofie, Kwesi
    Layera, Sebastian
    Lobo, Clara A.
    Mohammed, Mohammed
    Moka, Eleni
    Moreno, Milena
    Morgan, Bethan
    Polela, Arthur
    Rahimzadeh, Poupak
    Tangwiwat, Suwimon
    Uppal, Vishal
    Perez, Marcelo Vaz
    Volk, Thomas
    Wong, Patrick B. Y.
    Bowness, James S.
    Macfarlane, Alan J. R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 132 (05) : 1041 - 1048
  • [5] Exploring research priorities in landscape architecture: An international Delphi study
    Meijering, Jurian Vincent
    Tobi, Hilde
    van den Brink, Adri
    Morris, Fiona
    Bruns, Diedrich
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2015, 137 : 85 - 94
  • [6] Research priorities in nursing -: a Delphi study among Swedish nurses
    Back-Pettersson, Siv
    Hermansson, Evelyn
    Sernert, Ninni
    Bjorkelund, Cecilia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2008, 17 (16) : 2221 - 2231
  • [7] A Delphi study on research priorities in radiation therapy: The Norwegian perspective
    Egestad, H.
    Halkett, G. K. B.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHY, 2016, 22 (01) : 65 - 70
  • [8] A Delphi study on research priorities in radiation therapy: The Australian perspective
    Cox, Jennifer
    Halkett, Georgia
    Anderson, Claudia
    Heard, Robert
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHY, 2010, 16 (01) : 26 - 39
  • [9] Identifying the research priorities for schema therapy: A Delphi consensus study
    Pilkington, Pamela D. D.
    Younan, Rita
    Karantzas, Gery C. C.
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2023, 30 (02) : 344 - 356
  • [10] Research priorities in Adult Congenital Heart Disease nursing: an international Delphi study
    Goossens, E.
    Fleck, D.
    Canobbio, M. M.
    Harrison, J.
    Lyon, J. E.
    Moons, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2011, 10 : S33 - S34