A comparison of virtual versus in-person delivery of SafeCare on parent and implementation outcomes

Background: Evidence-based prevention services for child abuse and neglect (CAN), typically delivered via home visiting (HV), pivoted to virtual delivery in 2020 to continue family services while adhering to the COVID-19 public health guidelines. Objective: The study aims are to compare parent and implementation outcomes for the HV program, SafeCare (c), delivered virtually versus in-person, across a 2-year period. Methods: Three data sources were used to examine parent program engagement and skill mastery, as well as provider fidelity. Sources included: 1) quantitative service data collected as part of routine SafeCare implementation (in-person families, n = 923; virtual families, n = 1978), 2) qualitative survey data collected from SafeCare providers (n = 212) and 3) focus group data with SafeCare Providers (n = 9). Results: Service data were examined using mixed models due to the nesting of the data, with all analyses controlling for time. Qualitative data from the survey and focus groups were analyzed using thematic coding. Data were triangulated from the three sources to answer the primary research question. Findings suggest that virtual delivery of SafeCare holds promise, with parents who participated virtually completing more modules at a faster pace than in-person clients. SafeCare parents demonstrated positive programmatic outcomes regardless of whether they participated in the program virtually or in-person. Provider fidelity remained high in the transition to virtual delivery. However, technology-related logistical issues and provider self-efficacy related to virtual delivery presented challenges to program success. Conclusions: The study has multiple implications for the HV field about the viability of virtual service delivery. Further research is warranted with data collected directly from parents, and a more critical analysis of what works best for whom and when to further advance the field.