Diagnostic Performance of GFAP, UCH-L1, and MAP-2 Within 30 and 60 Minutes of Traumatic Brain Injury

被引:1
|
作者
Papa, Linda [1 ]
Mckinley, W. Ian [2 ]
Valadka, Alex B. [3 ]
Newman, Zachary C. [4 ]
Nordgren, Rachel K. [5 ]
Pramuka, Pierce E. [2 ]
Barbosa, Claire E. [6 ]
Brito, Alexandra M. P. [7 ]
Loss, Lindsey J. [7 ]
Tinoco-Garcia, Luis [7 ]
Hinson, H. E. [8 ]
Schreiber, Martin A. [7 ]
Rowell, Susan E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Orlando Reg Med Ctr Inc, Dept Emergency Med, 1335 Sligh Blvd,5th Floor, Orlando, FL 32806 USA
[2] Univ Chicago Med, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Surg, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Univ Chicago, Dept Social Sci & Psychol, Chicago, IL USA
[7] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Surg, Portland, OR USA
[8] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
FIBRILLARY ACIDIC PROTEIN; CT HEAD RULE; INTRACRANIAL LESIONS; TERMINAL HYDROLASE-L1; MILD; BIOMARKERS; HIPPOCAMPUS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31115
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Data on the performance of traumatic brain injury (TBI) biomarkers within minutes of injury are lacking. Objectives To examine the performance of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP-2) within 30 and 60 minutes of TBI in identifying intracranial lesions on computed tomography (CT) scan, need for neurosurgical intervention (NSI), and clinically important early outcomes (CIEO). Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study is a biomarker analysis of a multicenter prehospital TBI cohort from the Prehospital Tranexamic Acid Use for TBI clinical trial conducted across 20 centers and 39 emergency medical systems in North America from May 2015 to March 2017. Prehospital hemodynamically stable adult patients with traumatic injury and suspected moderate to severe TBI were included. Blood samples were measured for GFAP, UCH-L1, and MAP-2. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2023, to March 15, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures The presence of CT lesions, diffuse injury severity on CT, NSI within 24 hours of injury, and CIEO (composite outcome including early death, neurosurgery, or prolonged mechanical ventilation >= 7 days) within 7 days of injury. Results Of 966 patients enrolled, 804 patients (mean [SD] age, 41 [19] years; 418 [74.2%] male) had blood samples, including 563 within 60 minutes and 375 within 30 minutes of injury. Among patients with blood drawn within 30 minutes of injury, 212 patients (56.5%) had CT lesions, 61 patients (16.3%) had NSI, and 112 patients (30.0%) had CIEO. Among those with blood drawn within 60 minutes, 316 patients (56.1%) had CT lesions, 95 patients (16.9%) had NSI, and 172 patients (30.6%) had CIEO. All biomarkers showed significant elevations with worsening diffuse injury on CT within 30 and 60 minutes of injury. Among blood samples taken within 30 minutes, GFAP had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to detect CT lesions, at 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.92), followed by MAP-2 (AUC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.83) and UCH-L1 (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.80). Among blood samples taken within 60 minutes, AUCs for CT lesions were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.92) for GFAP, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.80) for MAP-2, and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69-0.77) for UCH-L1. Among blood samples taken within 30 minutes, AUCs for NSI were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84) for GFAP, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68-0.81) for MAP-2, and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.63-0.75) for UCH-L1; and for CIEO, AUCs were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93) for GFAP, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.78-0.87) for MAP-2, and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.72-0.82) for UCH-L1. Combining the biomarkers was no better than GFAP alone for all outcomes. At GFAP of 30 pg/mL within 30 minutes, sensitivity for CT lesions was 98.1% (95% CI, 94.9%-99.4%) and specificity was 34.4% (95% CI, 27.2%-42.2%). GFAP levels greater than 6200 pg/mL were associated with high risk of NSI and CIEO. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of prehospital patients with TBI, GFAP, UCH-L1, and MAP-2 measured within 30 and 60 minutes of injury were significantly associated with traumatic intracranial lesions and diffuse injury severity on CT scan, 24-hour NSI, and 7-day CIEO. GFAP was the strongest independent marker associated with all outcomes. This study sets a precedent for the early utility of GFAP in the first 30 minutes from injury in future clinical and research endeavors.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] UCH-L1 and GFAP: Efficient biomarkers for diagnosing traumatic brain injury
    Lakshmipriya, Thangavel
    Gopinath, Subash C. B.
    [J]. BRAIN AND SPINE, 2024, 4
  • [2] Are UCH-L1 and GFAP promising biomarkers for children with mild traumatic brain injury?
    Rhine, Tara
    Babcock, Lynn
    Zhang, Nanhua
    Leach, James
    Wade, Shari L.
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2016, 30 (10) : 1231 - 1238
  • [3] GFAP, BUT NOT UCH-L1, CORRELATES SIGNIFICANTLY WITH COGNITIVE OUTCOME AFTER TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY
    Shaw, Christopher
    Ngwenya, Laura
    Jed, Hartings
    Hayes, Ronald
    Valadka, Alex
    Tortella, Frank
    Foreman, Brandon
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47
  • [4] UCH-L1 AND MAP-2 BIOMARKERS IMPROVE 6-MONTH FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME PREDICTION IN SEVERE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY
    Heaton, Shelley C.
    Hannay, H. Julia
    Papa, Linda
    Tyner, Callie
    Hayes, Ronald
    Robertson, Claudia
    Schmalfuss, Ilona
    Wang, Kevin K. W.
    Robicsek, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2012, 29 (10) : A42 - A43
  • [5] Sex differences in time course and diagnostic accuracy of GFAP and UCH-L1 in trauma patients with mild traumatic brain injury
    Papa, Linda
    Brophy, Gretchen M.
    Alvarez, Wilmer
    Hirschl, Robert
    Cress, Marshall
    Weber, Kurt
    Giordano, Philip
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [6] Sex differences in time course and diagnostic accuracy of GFAP and UCH-L1 in trauma patients with mild traumatic brain injury
    Linda Papa
    Gretchen M. Brophy
    Wilmer Alvarez
    Robert Hirschl
    Marshall Cress
    Kurt Weber
    Philip Giordano
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13 (1)
  • [7] The diagnostic values of UCH-L1 in traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis
    Shahjouei, Shima
    Sadeghi-Naini, Mohsen
    Yang, Zhihui
    Kobeissy, Firas
    Rathore, Disa
    Shokraneh, Farhad
    Blackburn, Spiros
    Manley, Geoff T.
    Wang, Kevin K. W.
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2018, 32 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [8] GFAP AND UCH-L1 ARE NOT SPECIFIC BIOMARKERS FOR MILD CT-NEGATIVE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY
    Tenovuo, Olli
    Posti, Jussi
    Hossain, Md. Iftakher
    Takala, Riikka
    Liedes, Hilkka
    Newcombe, Virginia
    Outtrim, Joanne
    Katila, Ari
    Frantzen, Janek
    Ala-Seppala, Henna
    Coles, Jonathan
    Kyllonen, Anna
    Maanpaa, Henna-Riikka
    Tallus, Jussi
    Hutchinson, Peter
    van Gils, Mark
    Menon, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2016, 33 (13) : A20 - A20
  • [9] Damaged: Elevated GFAP and UCH-L1 as the Black Flag of Brain Injury
    Anderson, Taylor N.
    Hinson, Holly E.
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2020, 154 : 110 - 111
  • [10] Integrated Assessment of GFAP and UCH-L1 for their utility in severity assessment and outcome prediction in Traumatic Brain Injury
    Mathew, Deepu
    Purohit, Purvi
    Gadwal, Ashita
    Anil, Abhishek
    Sharma, Raghavendra Kumar
    Meshram, Vikas P.
    Setia, Puneet
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2024,