Do Birth Outcomes Predicted by Occipital Position Inform Definitions of Occiput Posterior and Occiput Transverse?

被引:0
|
作者
Pardey, Angela J. [1 ]
Phipps, Hala [2 ]
Eames, Amanda [3 ]
Hyett, Jon [2 ,4 ]
Kuah, Sabrina [5 ]
De Vries, Bradley [6 ]
机构
[1] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Sydney, Australia
[2] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Sydney Inst Women Children & Their Families, Sydney, Australia
[3] Tweed Valley Hosp, Northern New South Wales NSW Local Hlth Dist, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Cudgen, Australia
[4] Western Sydney Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Sydney, Australia
[5] Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Adelaide, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Cent Clin Sch, Sydney, Australia
关键词
fetal head position; fetal and obstetric outcomes; labour and delivery; human birth; spontaneous vaginal birth; ventouse-assisted birth; forceps-assisted birth; adverse birth outcomes; vaginal birth; birth injuries; FETAL HEAD POSITION; TRANSABDOMINAL ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT; TRANSVAGINAL DIGITAL EXAMINATION; ANAL-SPHINCTER INJURY; 2ND-STAGE; LABOR; ASSOCIATION; DELIVERY; RISK;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.61358
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Fetal head position significantly influences birth outcomes, with higher rates of complications observed when the fetal head is in the Occiput Posterior (OP) position compared to Occiput Transverse (OT) or Occiput Anterior (OA) positions. There is no consensus in the current literature on the precise rotational point at which the fetal occiput shifts from posterior to transverse, reducing clarity in both scientific and clinical communication. Different studies employ varying definitions of these positions, which affects management decisions. This study aims to determine if a definable threshold exists between the directly posterior and directly transverse positions that correlates with different birth outcomes, thereby proposing a consistent and clinically useful definition for OP versus OT. We analyzed ultrasound data from 570 patients at full dilatation from five previous studies, correlating the angle of the fetal occiput (noted on a clock -face) with birth outcomes. Adverse outcomes were defined as cesarean delivery, instrumental vaginal delivery, significant postpartum hemorrhage (500 ml or more), obstetric anal sphincter injury, five-minute Apgar scores <7, arterial cord pH <7, base excess less than -12, or neonatal intensive care unit admission. The analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.4. The study found a continuous relationship between the fetal occipital angle and adverse birth outcomes without a distinct threshold separating OP from OT positions. No clear inflection point was demonstrated in pregnancy outcomes between OT and OP. The relationship between the angle of occiput position and pregnancy outcomes was continuous: the closer the fetal head was to directly OP, the higher the likelihood of adverse outcomes. Given the lack of a clear cut-off and to improve consistency in future research, we recommend dividing the occiput position into four quadrants of 90 degrees each. This classification could standardize reporting and potentially improve clinical decisionmaking regarding fetal position during labor.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Are fetal and maternal outcomes of obstetric interventions better with occiput transverse or occiput posterior position in the second stage of labour?
    Tempest, N.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 7 - 7
  • [2] Are Fetal and Maternal Outcomes of Obstetric Interventions Better with Occiput Transverse or Occiput Posterior Position in the Second Stage of Labour?
    Tempest, Nicola
    Lane, Steven
    Hapangama, Dharani
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2018, 25 : 257A - 257A
  • [3] Manual rotation of occiput posterior or occiput transverse position: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Burd, Julia
    Gomez, Julie
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Bellussi, Federica
    de Vries, Bradley
    Phipps, Hala
    Blanc, Julie
    Broberg, Jeffrey
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Verhaeghe, Caroline
    Quist-Nelson, Johanna
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S455 - S456
  • [5] Management of occiput posterior position
    Hart, Jocelyn
    Walker, Amy
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2007, 52 (05) : 508 - 513
  • [6] Manual rotation of the fetal occiput in persistent transverse or posterior position
    Shaffer, BL
    Cheng, Y
    Caughey, AB
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (04): : 78S - 78S
  • [7] Manual rotation for persistent occiput posterior or occiput transverse positions in nulliparas
    Biggio, JR
    Owen, J
    Lu, GC
    Ramsey, PS
    Rouse, DJ
    Hauth, JC
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (04): : 69S - 70S
  • [8] MANAGEMENT OF OCCIPUT POSTERIOR POSITION
    GUSTAFSON, GW
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1949, 139 (05): : 280 - 285
  • [9] Posterior position of the occiput in labour
    Bjornson, O
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1933, 1933 (01): : 311 - 313
  • [10] Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: Obstetric outcomes
    Ponkey, SE
    Cohen, AP
    Heffner, LJ
    Lieberman, E
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 101 (05): : 915 - 920