Neonatal Outcomes of Infants Diagnosed with Fetal Growth Restriction during Late Pregnancy versus after Birth

被引:1
|
作者
Houri, Ohad [1 ]
Yoskovitz, Meytal Schwartz [1 ]
Walfisch, Asnat [1 ]
Pardo, Anat [1 ]
Geron, Yossi [1 ]
Hadar, Eran [1 ]
Bardin, Ron [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, IL-6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
fetal growth restriction; adverse neonatal outcomes; GESTATIONAL-AGE FETUSES; RECOGNITION; TERM;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13133753
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential differences in the outcomes of neonates in whom FGR was diagnosed late in pregnancy as compared to those in whom growth restriction was diagnosed after birth. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary medical center between 2017 and 2019. The study included women carrying a single infant with an estimated fetal weight below the tenth percentile in whom FGR was diagnosed during late pregnancy, after 32 gestational weeks (known late-onset FGR; study group) or only after birth (unknown FGR; control group). Data were collected by review of the electronic health records. The primary outcome measure was the rate of composite adverse neonatal outcome. Results: A total of 328 women were included, 77 (23.47%) in the known-FGR group and 251 (75.53%) in the unknown-FGR group. In the known-FGR group, an etiology for the FGR was identified in 28.57% cases, most commonly placental insufficiency (21.74%). Compared to the unknown-FGR group, the known-FGR group was characterized by significantly higher rates of elective cesarean delivery (15.58% vs. 9.96%, p < 0.001), preterm birth (18.18% vs. 3.98%, p < 0.01), and labor induction (67.53% vs. 21.51%, p < 0.01). A significantly higher proportion of neonates in the known-FGR group had a positive composite adverse outcome (38.96% vs. 15.53%, p < 0.01). For multivariate regression analysis adjusted for maternal age, gestational age at delivery, and mode of delivery, there was no difference between groups in the primary outcome (aOR 1.73, CI 0.89-3.35, p = 0.1). Every additional gestational week at delivery was a protective factor (aOR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.56-0.86, p < 0.01). Conclusions: A prenatal diagnosis of late-onset FGR is associated with higher intervention and preterm birth rates as compared to a diagnosis made after birth. Fetuses diagnosed with late-onset FGR during pregnancy should undergo specific and personalized assessment to determine the cause and severity of the growth delay and the best management strategy. This study highlights the importance of careful decision-making regarding the induction of labor in late-onset FGR.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neonatal outcomes in fetal growth restriction diagnosed using estimated fetal weight versus abdominal circumference
    Ramos, Sebastian Z.
    Rosenthal, Alex
    Panton, Constance
    Gimovsky, Alexis C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S252 - S252
  • [2] COMPARISON BETWEEN FETAL GROWTH RESTRICTION THAT OCCURS AFTER NORMAL BIRTH WEIGHT VERSUS FETAL GROWTH RESTRICTION THAT RECURS - PREGNANCY OUTCOMES IN CORRELATION WITH PLACENTAL HISTOPATHOLOGY
    Levy, Michal
    Alberti, David
    Kovo, Michal
    Schreiber, Letizia
    Koren, Liron
    Bar, Jacob
    Weiner, Eran
    PLACENTA, 2019, 83 : E28 - E28
  • [3] Sleep Patterns in Late Pregnancy and Risk of Preterm Birth and Fetal Growth Restriction
    Micheli, Katerina
    Komninos, Ioannis
    Bagkeris, Emmanouel
    Roumeliotaki, Theano
    Koutis, Antonis
    Kogevinas, Manolis
    Chatzi, Leda
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 22 (05) : 738 - 744
  • [4] Neonatal Outcomes of Late-Preterm Birth Associated or Not with Intrauterine Growth Restriction
    Rocha, Cristiane Ortigosa
    Bittar, Roberto Eduardo
    Zugaib, Marcelo
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 2010
  • [5] Neonatal outcomes in patients with resolved versus persistent uncomplicated fetal growth restriction
    Ramos, Sebastian Z.
    Has, Phinnara
    Gimovsky, Alexis C.
    Savitz, David A.
    Danilack, Valery A.
    Lewkowitz, Adam K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S661 - S662
  • [6] Customized growth curves better identify fetal growth restriction and short term neonatal outcomes in preterm low birth weight infants
    Law, Tameeka
    Katikaneni, Lakshmi
    Taylor, Sarah
    Korte, Jeffrey
    Ebeling, Myla
    Wagner, Carol
    Newman, Roger
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 : S10 - S10
  • [7] Fetal Growth Restriction Before and After Birth
    Westby, Andrea
    Miller, Laura
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2021, 104 (05) : 486 - 492
  • [8] Early growth outcomes in very low birth weight infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia or fetal growth restriction
    Check, Jennifer
    Jensen, Elizabeth T.
    Skelton, Joseph A.
    Ambrosius, Walter T.
    O'Shea, T. Michael
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2020, 88 (04) : 601 - 604
  • [9] Early growth outcomes in very low birth weight infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia or fetal growth restriction
    Jennifer Check
    Elizabeth T. Jensen
    Joseph A. Skelton
    Walter T. Ambrosius
    T. Michael O’Shea
    Pediatric Research, 2020, 88 : 601 - 604
  • [10] Fetal growth restriction and birth defects with newer and older antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy
    Veiby, Gyri
    Daltveit, Anne Kjersti
    Engelsen, Bernt A.
    Gilhus, Nils Erik
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2014, 261 (03) : 579 - 588