Validity and reliability of Arabic version of the ID Pain screening questionnaire in the assessment of neuropathic pain

被引:8
|
作者
Abu-Shaheen, Amani [1 ]
Yousef, Shehu [2 ]
Riaz, Muhammad [3 ]
Nofal, Abdullah [4 ]
Khan, Sarfaraz [2 ]
Heena, Humariya [1 ]
机构
[1] King Fahad Med City, Res Ctr, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Fahad Med City, Anesthesia Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Leicester, Dept Hlth Sci, Leicester, Leics, England
[4] King Saud Univ Med City, Disaster Management Unit, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; LINGUISTIC ADAPTATION; PREVALENCE; VALIDATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0192307
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Diagnosis of neuropathic pain (NP) can be challenging. The ID Pain (ID-P) questionnaire, a screening tool for NP, has been used widely both in the original version and translated forms. The aim of this study was to develop an Arabic version of ID-P and assess its validity and reliability in detecting neuropathic pain. The original ID-P was translated in Arabic language and administered to the study population. Reliability of the Arabic version was evaluated by percentage observed agreement, and Cohen's kappa; and validity by sensitivity, specificity, correctly classified, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Physician diagnosis was considered as the gold standard for comparing the diagnostic accuracy. The study included 375 adult patients (153 [40.8%] with NP; 222 [59.2%] with nociceptive pain). Overall observed percentage agreement and Cohen's kappa were >90% and >0.80, respectively. Median (range) score of ID-P scale was 3 (2-4) and 1 (0-2) in the NP group and NocP group, respectively (p<0.001). Area under the ROC curve was 0.808 (95% CI, 0.764-0.851). For the cut-off value of >2, sensitivity was 84.3%, specificity was 66.7%, and correct classification was 73.9%. Thus, the Arabic version of ID-P showed moderate reliability and validity as a pain assessment tool. This article presents the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of ID Pain questionnaire. This Arabic version may serve as a simple yet important screening tool, and help in appropriate management of neuropathic pain, specifically in primary care centers in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Testing the validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the pain DETECT questionnaire in the assessment of neuropathic pain
    Abu-Shaheen, Amani
    Yousef, Shehu
    Riaz, Muhammad
    Nofal, Abdullah
    AlFayyad, Isamme
    Khan, Sarfaraz
    Heena, Humariya
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (04):
  • [2] Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Identification Pain Questionnaire in the Assessment of Neuropathic Pain
    Uzunkulaoglu, Aslihan
    Kerim, Duygu
    Ay, Saime
    Ergin, Sureyya
    ARCHIVES OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 34 (03) : 262 - 267
  • [3] Turkish Version of the painDETECT Questionnaire in the Assessment of Neuropathic Pain: A Validity and Reliability Study
    Alkan, Hakan
    Ardic, Fusun
    Erdogan, Cagdas
    Sahin, Fusun
    Sarsan, Ayse
    Findikoglu, Gulin
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (12) : 1933 - 1943
  • [4] Development and testing of a neuropathic pain screening questionnaire: ID Pain - Russell Portenoy for the ID pain steering committee
    Portenoy, Russell
    Cleeland, Charles
    Griesing, Teresa
    Backonja, Miroslav
    Moskowitz, Roland
    Frey, William D.
    Mekhail, Nagy A.
    Millea, Paul J.
    Nicholson, Bruce D.
    Reyes-Gibby, Cielito C.
    Staats, Peter S.
    Stockbridge, Hal
    Sunshine, Abraham
    Brandenburg, Nancy
    Goudie, April R.
    Irish, William
    McLeod, Lori
    Whalen, Ed
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2006, 22 (08) : 1555 - 1565
  • [5] Construct validity and reliability of Finnish version of Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire
    Ruokolainen, Olli
    Haapea, Marianne
    Linton, Steven
    Korniloff, Katariina
    Hakkinen, Arja
    Paananen, Markus
    Karppinen, Jaro
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2016, 13 : 148 - 153
  • [6] Validity, Reliability, and Assessment Sensitivity of the Japanese Version of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 in Japanese Patients with Neuropathic and Non-Neuropathic Pain
    Maruo, Tomoyuki
    Nakae, Aya
    Maeda, Lynn
    Kenrin, Shi
    Takahashi, Kayoko
    Morris, Shayne
    Hosomi, Koichi
    Kanatani, Hiroshi
    Matsuzaki, Taiga
    Saitoh, Youichi
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2014, 15 (11) : 1930 - 1937
  • [7] Reliability and validity of Portuguese version of the Pain Impact Questionnaire
    Cavalheiro, Luis
    Gil, Joao N.
    Goncalves, Rui S.
    Pacheco, Paula
    Ferreira, Pedro L.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : 123 - 123
  • [8] Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Pain Disability Questionnaire
    Yoon, Jisun
    Choi, Kyoung Hyo
    Kim, Tae Woo
    Yang, Seo Yon
    Sim, Mi Kyung
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2013, 37 (06): : 814 - 823
  • [9] The reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Fear of Pain Questionnaire
    Sole, Ester
    Castarlenas, Elena
    Sanchez-Rodriguez, Elisabet
    Galan, Santiago
    de la Vega, Rocio
    Jensen, Mark P.
    Miro, Jordi
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 24 (08) : 1134 - 1144
  • [10] Linguistic adaptation into Spanish and psychometric validation of the neuropathic pain screening questionnaire:: ID pain
    Galvez, R.
    Pardo, A.
    Ceron, J. M.
    Villasante, F.
    Arangueren, J. L.
    Saldana, M. T.
    Navarro, A.
    Ruiz, M. A.
    Diaz, S.
    Rejas, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (06) : A466 - A467