Reporting quality of published reviews of commercial and publicly available mobile health apps (mHealth app reviews): a scoping review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Gasteiger, Norina [1 ,2 ]
Norman, Gill [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Grainger, Rebecca [4 ]
Eost-Telling, Charlotte [1 ,2 ]
Jones, Debra [1 ]
Ali, Syed Mustafa [2 ,5 ]
van der Veer, Sabine N. [2 ,5 ]
Ford, Claire R. [1 ]
Hall, Alex [1 ]
Law, Kate [1 ,6 ]
Byerly, Matthew [7 ]
Davies, Alan [5 ]
Paripoorani, Deborah [2 ,8 ]
Shi, Chunhu [1 ,2 ]
Dowding, Dawn [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Div Nursing Midwifery & Social Work, Manchester, England
[2] NIHR Appl Res Collaborat Greater Manchester, Manchester, England
[3] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, NIHR Innovat Observ, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[4] Univ Otago, Dept Med, Wellington, New Zealand
[5] Univ Manchester, Ctr Hlth Informat, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Manchester, England
[6] Christie Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester, England
[7] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Wichita, KS USA
[8] Manchester Royal Infirm, EMERGING Res Team, Manchester, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
关键词
Information technology; Telemedicine; eHealth; STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083364
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Reviews of commercial and publicly available smartphone (mobile) health applications (mHealth app reviews) are being undertaken and published. However, there is variation in the conduct and reporting of mHealth app reviews, with no existing reporting guidelines. Building on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we aim to develop the Consensus for APP Review Reporting Items (CAPPRRI) guidance, to support the conduct and reporting of mHealth app reviews. This scoping review of published mHealth app reviews will explore their alignment, deviation, and modification to the PRISMA 2020 items for systematic reviews and identify a list of possible items to include in CAPPRRI. Method and analysis We are following the Joanna Briggs Institute approach and Arksey and O'Malley's five-step process. Patient and public contributors, mHealth app review, digital health research and evidence synthesis experts, healthcare professionals and a specialist librarian gave feedback on the methods. We will search SCOPUS, CINAHL Plus, AMED, EMBASE, Medline, APA PsycINFO and the ACM Digital Library for articles reporting mHealth app reviews and use a two-step screening process to identify eligible articles. Information on whether the authors have reported, or how they have modified the PRISMA 2020 items in their reporting, will be extracted. Data extraction will also include the article characteristics, protocol and registration information, review question frameworks used, information about the search and screening process, how apps have been evaluated and evidence of stakeholder engagement. This will be analysed using a content synthesis approach and presented using descriptive statistics and summaries. This protocol is registered on OSF (https://osf.io/5ahjx). Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications (shared on our project website and on the EQUATOR Network website where the CAPPRRI guidance has been registered as under development), conference presentations and blog and social media posts in lay language.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Characteristics, methodological, and reporting quality of scoping reviews published in nursing journals: A systematic review
    Woo, Brigitte Fong Yeong
    Tam, Wilson Wai San
    Williams, Michelle Y. Y.
    Yong, Jenna Qing Yun Ow
    Cheong, Zu Yu
    Ong, Yoke Chin
    Poon, Sum Nok
    Goh, Yong Shian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2023, 55 (04) : 874 - 885
  • [2] A scoping review on the methodological and reporting quality of scoping reviews in China
    Xue, Xinyu
    Tang, Xintong
    Liu, Shanshan
    Yu, Ting
    Chen, Zhonglan
    Chen, Ningsu
    Yu, Jiajie
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [3] A scoping review on the methodological and reporting quality of scoping reviews in China
    Xinyu Xue
    Xintong Tang
    Shanshan Liu
    Ting Yu
    Zhonglan Chen
    Ningsu Chen
    Jiajie Yu
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 24
  • [4] Issues in reporting of systematic review methods in health app-focused reviews: A scoping review
    Grainger, Rebecca
    Devan, Hemakumar
    Sangelaji, Bahram
    Hay-Smith, Jean
    [J]. HEALTH INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (04) : 2930 - 2945
  • [5] Reporting quality of scoping reviews in dental public health
    Dotto, Lara
    dos Santos, Mateus Bertolini Fernandes
    Sarkis-Onofre, Rafael
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [6] Reporting quality of scoping reviews in dental public health
    Lara Dotto
    Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos Santos
    Rafael Sarkis-Onofre
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 23
  • [7] Mobile Health App Database - A Repository for Quality Ratings of mHealth Apps
    Stach, Michael
    Kraft, Robin
    Probst, Thomas
    Messner, Eva-Maria
    Terhorst, Yannik
    Baumeister, Harald
    Schickler, Marc
    Reichert, Manfred
    Sander, Lasse Bosse
    Pryss, Rudiger
    [J]. 2020 IEEE 33RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-BASED MEDICAL SYSTEMS(CBMS 2020), 2020, : 427 - 432
  • [8] Methodological quality, guidance, and tools in scoping reviews: a scoping review protocol
    Pollock, Danielle
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Peters, Micah D. J.
    Mclnerney, Patricia A.
    Khalil, Hanan
    Godfrey, Christina M.
    Alexander, Lyndsay A.
    Munn, Zachary
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (04) : 1098 - 1105
  • [9] Comparison of Reporting and Transparency in Published Protocols and Publications in Umbrella Reviews: Scoping Review
    Zhao, Liang
    Shen, Caiyi
    Liu, Ming
    Zhang, Jiaoyan
    Cheng, Luying
    Li, Yuanyuan
    Yuan, Lanbin
    Zhang, Junhua
    Tian, Jinhui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [10] Availability and quality of publicly available health workforce data sources in Australia: a scoping review protocol
    Gillam, Marianne
    Leach, Matthew
    Muller, Jessica
    Gonzalez-Chica, David
    Jones, Martin
    Muyambi, Kuda
    Walsh, Sandra
    May, Esther
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (01):