Taking Explanation Seriously in Political Science

被引:16
|
作者
Daigneault, Pierre-Marc [1 ]
Beland, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Emploi & Solidar Sociale Quebec, Direct Rech, Quebec City, PQ G1R 4Z1, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Johnson Shoyama Grad Sch Publ Policy, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B8, Canada
关键词
causal inference; epistemology; explanation; ideas; institutions; psychology; CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS; RETHINKING; ONTOLOGY; IDEAS;
D O I
10.1111/1478-9302.12055
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The concept of explanation' has attracted considerable attention in the social sciences, and particularly within political science. However, scholars are not always familiar with what explaining political phenomena means, let alone with what it entails for developing sound causal arguments. This article introduces Craig Parsons' typology of explanation before assessing its value for the causal analysis of political behaviour and processes. As argued, despite its limitations, this typology clearly maps four types of explanation in political science (institutional, ideational, structural and psychological) while helping scholars to combine them more rigorously when needed. This is why Parsons' typology has the potential to move political scientists to the next level' as far as explanation' is concerned.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 392
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条