Critical factors that affect logistics performance: a comparison of China, Japan and Korea

被引:11
|
作者
Hwang, David W. [1 ]
Hong, Paul C. [2 ]
Lee, Daniel Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] Shippensburg Univ, Dept Finance & Supply Chain Management, Shippensburg, PA 17257 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Informat Operat & Technol Management, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Shippensburg Univ, Dept Econ, Shippensburg, PA 17257 USA
关键词
logistics performance; China; Japan; Korea; government industrial policy priorities; strategic infrastructure development; public-private logistics growth; communication network configurations; INDUSTRIALIZATION EVIDENCE; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; SOUTH-KOREA; MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORTATION; INFRASTRUCTURE; INTEGRATION; EFFICIENCY; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1504/IJSTL.2017.080587
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In globalised and uncertain business environments, many firms have turned their attention to logistics in order to make their business processes more efficient and cost-effective. In this paper, we identify critical factors that affect logistics performance at the macro level by surveying current literature. The factors include industrial policy priorities, strategic infrastructure development, public-private logistics market growth, and communication network configurations. We also compare the logistics of three East Asian countries (China, Japan, and Korea), using relevant macro-level data. These three countries are increasingly important in global logistics with their aggregate GDP accounting for approximately 21% of the world GDP. Finally, to facilitate future research, we offer eight propositions regarding relationships among critical factors and logistics outcomes. Critical issues facing the three nations' logistics industries are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 129
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Empirical Study on the Effects of Export Promotion on Korea-China-Japan Using Logistics Performance Index (LPI)
    La, Kong-Woo
    Song, Jin-Gu
    JOURNAL OF KOREA TRADE, 2019, 23 (07): : 96 - 112
  • [2] China with Japan and Korea
    不详
    SCOTTISH GEOGRAPHICAL MAGAZINE, 1945, 61 (02): : 69 - 69
  • [3] China, Japan, and Korea
    不详
    GEOGRAPHICAL REVIEW, 1922, 12 (04) : 664 - 665
  • [4] China, Japan, and Korea
    不详
    GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 1921, 58 (05): : 382 - 384
  • [5] Traditional Medicine in China, Korea, and Japan: A Brief Introduction and Comparison
    Park, Hye-Lim
    Lee, Hun-Soo
    Shin, Byung-Cheul
    Liu, Jian-Ping
    Shang, Qinghua
    Yamashita, Hitoshi
    Lim, Byungmook
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 2012
  • [6] The Comparison of Animation Industries of US, Japan, South Korea and China
    Ren Guoqiang
    Jin Weijie
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOGISTICS SYSTEMS AND INTELLIGENT MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 1901 - 1904
  • [7] Factors That Affect The Performance Of Logistics Employees At Pharmaceutical Wholesalers X In Banjarmasin
    Alawiyah, Tuti
    Backhtia, Yanuar
    Daud, Ibrahim
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND SARI MULIA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND SCIENCES 2017 (SMICHS 2017), 2017, 6 : 644 - 651
  • [8] Logistics IS resources, organizational factors, and operational performance: An investigation into domestic logistics firms in China
    Pan, Xiaodan
    Dresner, Martin
    Xie, Yurong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 30 (02) : 569 - 594
  • [9] FACTORS THAT AFFECT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS: A CRITICAL REVIEW
    Zaman, Farhana
    Yoon, Daeyoung
    ASIA-PACIFIC MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING JOURNAL, 2016, 11 (02): : 79 - 106
  • [10] Determinants of global logistics hub ports: Comparison of the port development policies of Taiwan, Korea, and Japan
    Yang, Yi-Chih
    Chen, Shu-Ling
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2016, 45 : 179 - 189