Outcome after decompressive craniectomy in older adults after traumatic brain injury

被引:2
|
作者
Kapapa, Thomas [1 ]
Jesuthasan, Stefanie [1 ]
Schiller, Franziska [1 ]
Schiller, Frederike [1 ]
Woischneck, Dieter [2 ]
Graeve, Stefanie [3 ]
Barth, Eberhard [3 ]
Mayer, Benjamin [4 ]
Oehmichen, Marcel [5 ]
Pala, Andrej [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ulm, Dept Neurosurg, Ulm, Germany
[2] Hosp Landshut, Neurosurg Dept, Landshut, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Ulm, Sect Interdisciplinary Operat Intens Care Med, Ulm, Germany
[4] Univ Ulm, Inst Epidemiol & Med Biometry, Ulm, Germany
[5] Mil Hosp Ulm, Neurosurg Dept, Ulm, Germany
关键词
brain edema; demographic change; risk; survival rate; elderly; HEAD-INJURY; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; DECISION-MAKING; SURGERY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MORTALITY; FRAILTY; AGE; POPULATION;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2024.1422040
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Globally, many societies are experiencing an increase in the number of older adults (>65 years). However, there has been a widening gap between the chronological and biological age of older adults which trend to a more active and social participating part of the society. Concurrently, the incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is increasing globally. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome after TBI and decompressive craniectomy (DC) in older adults compared with younger patients. Methods A retrospective, multi-centre, descriptive, observational study was conducted, including severe TBI patients who were treated with DC between 2005 and 2022. Outcome after discharge and 12 months was evaluated according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (Sliding dichotomy based on three prognostic bands). Significance was established as p <= 0.05. Results A total of 223 patients were included. The majority (N = 158, 70.9%) survived TBI and DC at discharge. However, unfavourable outcome was predominant at discharge (88%) and after 12 months (67%). There was a difference in favour of younger patients (<= 65 years) between the age groups at discharge (p = 0.006) and at 12 months (p < 0.001). A subgroup analysis of the older patients (66 to <= 74 vs. >= 75 years) did not reveal any significant differences. After 12 months, 64% of the older patients had a fatal outcome. Only 10% of those >65 years old had a good or very good outcome. 25% were depending on support in everyday activities. After 12 months, the age (OR 0.937, p = 0.007, CI 95%: 0.894-0.981; univariate) and performed cranioplasty (univariate and multivariate results) were influential factors for the dichotomized GOS. For unfavourable outcome after 12 months, the thresholds were calculated for age = 55.5 years (p < 0.001), time between trauma and surgery = 8.25 h (p = 0.671) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) = 4 (p = 0.429). Conclusion Even under the current modern conditions of neuro-critical care, with significant advances in intensive care and rehabilitation medicine, the majority of patients >65 years of age following severe TBI and DC died or were dependent and usually required extensive support. This aspect should also be taken into account during decision making and counselling (inter-, intradisciplinary or with relatives) for a very mobile and active older section of society, together with the patient's will.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcome after decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury
    Howard, Jerry Lee
    Cipolle, Mark D.
    Anderson, Meredith
    Sabella, Victoria
    Shollenberger, Daniele
    Li, P. Mark
    Pasquale, Michael D.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 65 (02): : 380 - 385
  • [2] Comment on: Decompressive craniectomy after traumatic brain injury
    Hoellig, A.
    Coburn, M.
    ANAESTHESIST, 2016, 65 (11): : 872 - 873
  • [3] Radiographic predictors of clinical outcome in traumatic brain injury after decompressive craniectomy
    Hong, Jung Ho
    Jeon, Ikchan
    Seo, Youngbeom
    Kim, Seong Ho
    Yu, Dongwoo
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2021, 163 (05) : 1371 - 1381
  • [4] Decompressive Craniectomy after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Children: Complications and Outcome
    Pechmann, Astrid
    Anastasopoulos, Constantin
    Korinthenberg, Rudolf
    van Velthoven-Wurster, Vera
    Kirschner, Janbernd
    NEUROPEDIATRICS, 2015, 46 (01) : 5 - 12
  • [5] Impact of Decompressive Craniectomy on Functional Outcome After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
    Williams, Regan F.
    Magnotti, Louis J.
    Croce, Martin A.
    Hargraves, Brinson B.
    Fischer, Peter E.
    Schroeppel, Thomas J.
    Zarzaur, Ben L.
    Muhlbauer, Michael
    Timmons, Shelly D.
    Fabian, Timothy C.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 66 (06): : 1570 - 1576
  • [6] Radiographic predictors of clinical outcome in traumatic brain injury after decompressive craniectomy
    Jung Ho Hong
    Ikchan Jeon
    Youngbeom Seo
    Seong Ho Kim
    Dongwoo Yu
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2021, 163 : 1371 - 1381
  • [7] Outcome after decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury - Discussion
    Gracias, Vincente
    Cipolle, Mark
    Tisherman, Samuel A.
    Knuth, Thomas E.
    Kelly, Edward
    McQuay, Nathaniel
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 65 (02): : 385 - 386
  • [8] Outcome after Intracerebral Haemorrhage and Decompressive Craniectomy in Older Adults
    Kapapa, Thomas
    Jesuthasan, Stefanie
    Schiller, Frederike
    Schiller, Franziska
    Oehmichen, Marcel
    Woischneck, Dieter
    Mayer, Benjamin
    Pala, Andrej
    NEUROLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 16 (03): : 590 - 604
  • [9] SUBDURAL HYGROMA AFTER DECOMPRESSIVE CRANIECTOMY IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY
    Hwang, Hyung Sik
    Yi, Ho Jun
    Lee, Sang Gun
    Sheen, Seung Hun
    Moon, Seung-Myung
    Shin, Il Young
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2014, 31 (05) : A64 - A65
  • [10] Outcomes of decompressive craniectomy in patients after traumatic brain injury
    Nambiar, Mithun
    Maclsaac, Christopher
    Grabinski, Rafal
    Liew, Danny
    Kavar, Bhadrakant
    CRITICAL CARE AND RESUSCITATION, 2015, 17 (02) : 67 - 72