Comparison of two percutaneous nephrolithotomy methods for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones: Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy

被引:0
|
作者
Karkin, Kadir [1 ,4 ]
Aydamirov, Mubariz [2 ]
Aksay, Bugra [1 ]
Kaplan, Eyuep [3 ]
Gurlen, Guclu [1 ]
Altunkol, Adem [1 ]
Ortaoglu, Ferhat [1 ]
Akgun, Omer Faruk [1 ]
Vuruskan, Ediz [1 ]
Gurbuz, Zafer Gokhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Sci Univ, Adana City Training & Res Hosp, Urol Clin, Adana, Turkiye
[2] Baskent Univ, Alanya Applicat & Res Ctr, Alanya, Turkiye
[3] Abdulkadir Yuksel State Hosp, Urol Clin, Gaziantep, Turkiye
[4] Hlth Sci Univ, Adana City Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Adana, Turkiye
关键词
Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Pediatric Kidney Stones; PRESCHOOL AGE CHILDREN; COMPLICATIONS; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; INFANTS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.4081/aiua.2024.12369
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: In this study, the aim was to compare the results of mini and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones. Materials and Methods: Data for 128 patients < 18 years of age who underwent mini and standard PCNL due to pediatric kidney stones were retrospectively examined. Patients were divided into two groups: mini-PCNL (16-20 Fr) and standard PCNL (26 Fr). Surgery time, number of punctures to the pelvicalyceal system, hospital stay, postoperative hemoglobin drop, complications and stone-free status (SFR) were compared between the groups. Additional surgical intervention (double-J stent, ureterorenoscopy, secondary PCNL) performed after the surgery was recorded. The absence of residual stones or < 3 mm residual stones on kidney, ureter and bladder radiography (KUB) and ultrasonography (USG) performed in the third postoperative month were accepted as success criteria. Results: There were 32 (43.8%) patients in the mini-PCNL group and 41 (56.2%) patients in the standard PCNL group. The mean age was 9.3 +/- 4.1 years in the mini-PCNL group and 10.1 +/- 5.4 years in the standard PCNL group. Mean stone size in the mini-PCNL group was 2.1 +/- 1.2; while for standard PCNL it was 2.3 +/- 1.4. The mean surgery time was statistically significantly higher in the mini-PCNL group (p = 0.005). There was no difference between the groups in terms of intraoperative double J stent use, postoperative complications and SFR. A double J stent was inserted in two patients in the mini-PCNL group and in one patient in the standard PCNL group due to urine leakage from the nephrostomy tract in the postoperative period. Although the postoperative hemoglobin drop was found to be significantly higher in standard PCNL (p = 0.001), hematuria and blood transfusion rates were low in both groups. Mean hospital stay was shorter in the mini-PCNL group compared to standard PCNL (3.6 +/- 1.2 days vs. 2.5 +/- 1.1; p = 0.018). Conclusions: Although mini-PCNL has longer surgery time compared to standard PCNL, it should be preferred for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones due to advantages such as similar success and complication rates to standard PCNL, short hospital stay and less postoperative hemoglobin drop.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: outcome and complications
    Hesham M. Refaat
    Mohammed Hassan
    Tarek Salem
    Mohammed Zaza
    [J]. African Journal of Urology, 29
  • [2] Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: outcome and complications
    Refaat, Hesham M. M.
    Hassan, Mohammed
    Salem, Tarek
    Zaza, Mohammed
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 29 (01)
  • [3] Comparison of standard- and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones
    Khadgi, Sanjay
    El-Nahas, Ahmed R.
    El-Shazly, Mohamed
    Al-Terki, Abdullatif
    [J]. ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 19 (02) : 147 - 151
  • [4] Comparison Between Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Management of Large Renal Stones: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
    Elsaeed, Karim Omar
    Sadeq, Mohammed Metwally
    Hassan, Karim Meslhy
    Osman, Dana
    Emam, Ahmed
    Tawfeek, Ahmed M.
    Osman, Tarek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (12) : 1254 - 1260
  • [5] Comparison of Scoring Systems in Pediatric Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
    Utangac, Mehmet Mazhar
    Tepeler, Abdulkadir
    Daggulli, Mansur
    Tosun, Muhammed
    Dede, Onur
    Armagan, Abdullah
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2016, 93 : 40 - 44
  • [6] Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large kidney stones: a randomized prospective study
    Ali Güler
    Akif Erbin
    Burak Ucpinar
    Metin Savun
    Omer Sarilar
    Mehmet Fatih Akbulut
    [J]. Urolithiasis, 2019, 47 : 289 - 295
  • [7] Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large kidney stones: a randomized prospective study
    Guler, Ali
    Erbin, Akif
    Ucpinar, Burak
    Savun, Metin
    Sarilar, Omer
    Akbulut, Mehmet Fatih
    [J]. UROLITHIASIS, 2019, 47 (03) : 289 - 295
  • [8] COMPARISON OF INTRARENAL PELVIC PRESSURE LEVELS DURING FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY, MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY AND STANDARD PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY IN A KIDNEY MODEL
    Doizi, Steeve
    Uzan, Audrey
    Keller, Etienne
    De Coninck, Vincent
    Rodriguez-Monsalve, Maria
    Traxer, Olivier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E752 - E752
  • [9] Comparison of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: a randomized, clinical trial
    Moosanejad, N.
    Firouzian, A.
    Hashemi, S. A.
    Bahari, M.
    Fazli, M.
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 49 (04)
  • [10] Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex Staghorn Stones in Children
    Rashid, Aso Omer
    Amin, Shakhawan Hama
    Al Kadum, Mohammed Abed
    Mohammed, Sarbaz Kamal
    Buchholz, Noor
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2019, 102 (03) : 356 - 359