What Drives the Sustainability Reporting Intentions of Firms?

被引:0
|
作者
Ofori-Owusu, Charles [1 ]
Owusu, Godfred Matthew Yaw [1 ]
Agyenim-Boateng, Cletus [1 ]
Welbeck, Edem Emerald Sabah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghana Business Sch, Dept Accounting, POB LG 78, Accra, Ghana
关键词
theory of planned behaviour; sustainability reporting; sustainable development goals; developing countries; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; MANAGERIAL PERCEPTIONS; DECISION-MAKING; COMMITMENT; VALIDITY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.3390/su16125052
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Global leaders have adopted sustainable development goals to address critical issues like climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution from both human activities and firms. Over the years, there has been a demand for stricter regulations, accountability, and improved sustainable business practices by stakeholders. In the field of accounting, voluntary disclosure of firms' sustainability efforts has become an important component of firm reporting architecture. Despite being a voluntary practice in many jurisdictions, sustainability reporting has become essential for firms to demonstrate their commitment to meeting sustainability goals, ensuring future growth, and achieving long-term success. This study examines firms' sustainability reporting intentions and further investigates the dominant factors that drive such intentions, relying on the extended version of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Data for the study were gathered from managers of member firms with the Association of Ghana Industries. Using a total of 518 valid responses, the study's hypotheses were tested employing the partial least square structural equation modelling technique. The results indicate that subjective norm, perceived behavioural control, dynamic capabilities, cultural tightness-looseness, sustainability commitment, and perceived benefit are good predictors of firms' sustainability reporting intentions. However, the results suggest an inverse relationship exists between attitude, perceived cost, and intention to engage in sustainability reporting. The findings highlight some of the critical factors driving sustainability reporting behaviour among firms.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What Drives the Voluntary Environmental Reporting (VER): An Examination of CDP India Firms
    Kumar, Praveen
    Firoz, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 7 (01) : 45 - 57
  • [2] MINING FIRMS AND SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN GHANA
    Hinson, Robert Ebo
    Renner, Anne
    Kosiba, John Paul
    Asiedu, Frederick Okyere
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY (IMES 2018), 2018, : 417 - 426
  • [3] What drives brand supportive intentions?
    Wu, Hung-Che
    Chang, Ya-Yuan
    MARKETING INTELLIGENCE & PLANNING, 2019, 37 (05) : 497 - 512
  • [4] What drives green persistence intentions?
    Wu, Hung-Che
    Cheng, Ching-Chan
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2019, 31 (01) : 157 - 183
  • [5] What Drives the Liquidity of Industrial Firms?
    Abdulla, Yomna
    Ebrahim, Rabab
    Kumaraswamy, Sumathi
    Junaid, Muhammad
    GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2024, 25 (2_SUPPL) : S90 - S102
  • [6] Sustainability Reporting in Family Firms: A Panel Data Analysis
    Gavana, Giovanna
    Gottardo, Pietro
    Moisello, Anna Maria
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (01)
  • [7] Sustainability Reporting and Firm Performance: The Demonstration of Pakistani Firms
    Hongming, Xie
    Ahmed, Bilal
    Hussain, Arif
    Rehman, Alam
    Ullah, Irfan
    Khan, Farman Ullah
    SAGE OPEN, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [8] Are firms (getting) ready for the corporate sustainability reporting directive?
    Urska Kosi
    Paula Relard
    Sustainability Nexus Forum, 32 (1)
  • [9] Reporting Systems for Sustainability: What Are They Measuring?
    Kathryn M. Davidson
    Social Indicators Research, 2011, 100 : 351 - 365
  • [10] Reporting Systems for Sustainability: What Are They Measuring?
    Davidson, Kathryn M.
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2011, 100 (02) : 351 - 365